CEDHCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG29
CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 21 octobre 2021
- ECLI
- ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1021DEC004730912
- Date
- 21 octobre 2021
- Publication
- 21 octobre 2021
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleStruck out of the list
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5FFF0A75 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:7pt } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s7CB9076 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sF920FE69 { font-family:Arial; color:#f8f8f8 } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s241E80BF { width:7.44pt; display:inline-block } .s2DAEB59D { width:159.1pt; display:inline-block } .sC30055DD { width:0.44pt; display:inline-block } .sB136BB97 { width:166.44pt; display:inline-block }   FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 47309/12 Mykhaylo Oleksandrovych VYSHNEVSKYY against Ukraine   The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 21   October 2021 as a Committee composed of:   Lətif Hüseynov, President,   Lado Chanturia,   Arnfinn Bårdsen, judges, and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 17   July 2012, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The applicant, Mr Mykhaylo Oleksandrovych Vyshnevskyy, is a Ukrainian national, who was born in 1956 and lives in the Rivne region. On 25 May 2020 the applicant’s complaint under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the alleged breach of the equality-of-arms principle in the administrative proceedings initiated by him against the pension authorities was communicated to the Ukrainian Government (“the Government”). On the same date the Court informed the applicant about the necessity to be represented by an advocate at that stage of the proceedings and instructed him to appoint one. His attention was drawn to the fact that in case of his failure to appoint a lawyer, the Court might conclude that he was no longer interested in pursuing the application and might decide to strike it out of its list of cases. In the absence of any reply, on 21 January 2021 the Court re-sent its letter of 25 May 2020 to the applicant. The applicant did not reply. On 13   April 2021 the Court sent another letter to the applicant, this time by registered post, instructing him to appoint an advocate by 17 May 2021 and warning him that, in case of a failure to do so, the Court might conclude that he was no longer interested in pursuing the application and might decide to strike it out of its list of cases. According to the postal tracking information, the applicant received the Court’s letter on 6 May 2021. However, there has been no response to it. THE LAW In the light of the foregoing, and in the absence of any special circumstances regarding respect for the rights guaranteed by the Convention and the Protocols thereto, the Court, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the application. Accordingly, the case should be struck out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 18 November 2021.   {signature_p_2}   Viktoriya Maradudina   Lətif Hüseynov   Acting Deputy Registrar   President  Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
- Formation
- 29
- Date
- 21 octobre 2021
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1021DEC004730912
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral