CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 21 octobre 2021

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5FFF0A75 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:7pt } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .sB9541D82 { font-family:Arial; color:#212121 } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s7CB9076 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sF920FE69 { font-family:Arial; color:#f8f8f8 } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s241E80BF { width:7.44pt; display:inline-block } .s3DF5EF88 { width:128.75pt; display:inline-block } .sC30055DD { width:0.44pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s59272B2C { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s3136A51 { width:98.74%; border-collapse:collapse } .s5AFCE44B { width:7.62%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s598389F8 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s93C87377 { width:67.74%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sBEDA98F9 { width:24.62%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sA43E462F { width:7.62%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2E932ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:11pt } .s2C2132F { width:67.74%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s1A1A0F0F { width:24.62%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top }   THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 55155/09 Igor Nikolayevich SUKHIN and Others against Russia   The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 21   October 2021 as a Committee composed of:   Peeter Roosma, President,   Dmitry Dedov,   Andreas Zünd, judges, and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 21   September 2009, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of the applicants is set out in the appendix. The applicants’ complaints under Article 10 § 1 of the Convention concerning a disproportionate interference with their freedom of expression were communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government”), who submitted observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicants, who were invited to submit their own observations. No reply was received to the Registry’s letter. By letter dated 13 January 2020 , sent by registered post, the applicants were notified that the period allowed for submission of their observations had expired on 13 November 2019 and that no extension of time had been requested. The applicants’ attention was drawn to Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. The applicants received this letter on 10 February 2020. However, no response followed. On 1 February 2021 a letter was received from one of the applicants, in which he informed the Court about their representative’s death in 2016. By letters of 24 February 2021, sent by registered post, the applicants were notified about a new time-limit granted for submitting their written observations together with their claims for just satisfaction. However, no reply has been received. By letters dated 8 July 2021, sent by registered post, the applicants were notified that the period allowed for submission of their observations had expired on 26   April 2021 and that no extension of time had been requested. The applicants’ attention was drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. Two of the applicants received these letters on 13 August 2021. However, no response followed. The letters to the other applicants were not claimed by them and were sent back to the Court on 1   September 2021. THE LAW In the light of the foregoing, and in the absence of any special circumstances regarding respect for the rights guaranteed by the Convention and the Protocols thereto, the Court, in accordance with Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention, considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the application. Accordingly, the case should be struck out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 18 November 2021.   {signature_p_2}   Viktoriya Maradudina   Peeter Roosma   Acting Deputy Registrar   President     APPENDIX List of the applicants No. Applicant’s Name Year of birth 1. Igor Nikolayevich SUKHIN 1971 2. Aleksandr Nikolayevich ANDRUSHONOK 1953 3. Marlen Koryunovich ARUTYUNYAN 1958 4. Aleksandr Ivanovich GLOTOV 1955 5. Petr Vasilyevich KLEVTSOV 1954 6. Vladimir Sergeyevich KOPAYEV 1955 7. Roman Mikhaylovich KULESHOV 1976 8. Petr Ivanovich KURILO 1950 9. Rais Rashidovich NABIULLIN 1954 10. Igor Aleksandrovich NASYROV 1965 11. Petr Yerofeyevich NIKOLENKO 1953 12. Vasiliy Mikhaylovich NIKOLYAK 1964 13. Igor Vladimirovich OSTREYKIN 1964 14. Arkadiy Artemovich POPEKA 1958 15. Aleksandr Yevgenyevich REDKIN 1959 16. Aleksandr Vladimirovich SEVOSTYANOV 1954 17. Aleksandr Leonidovich SILITSKIY 1962 18. Yuriy Leonidovich YEFREMOV 1964