CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 10 novembre 2021

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5FFF0A75 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:7pt } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s7CB9076 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sF920FE69 { font-family:Arial; color:#f8f8f8 } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s241E80BF { width:7.44pt; display:inline-block } .s376CDD9C { width:117.08pt; display:inline-block } .sC30055DD { width:0.44pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .sA68E35A7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 715/19 Florin-Mihai APARASCHIVEI against Romania and 14 other applications (see appended table)   The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 10   November 2021 as a Committee composed of:   Armen Harutyunyan, President,   Jolien Schukking,   Ana Maria Guerra Martins, judges, and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of the applicants is set out in the appendix. The applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Romanian Government, who submitted observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicants, who were invited to submit their own observations. No reply was received by the Court. By letters sent by registered post, the applicants were notified that the time allowed for the submission of their observations had expired (see the appended table for the relevant dates). The applicants’ attention was further drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. No reply to these letters has been received by the Court (see details in the appended table). THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. In the light of the foregoing, the Court concludes that the applicants may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue the applications (Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention). Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in   fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto which require the continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 2 December 2021.   {signature_p_2}   Viktoriya Maradudina   Armen Harutyunyan   Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article   3 of the Convention (inadequate conditions of detention)   No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Date of the applicant’s last letter to the Court Date of the Court’s registered letter Date of receipt of the registered letter New time-limit for submission of observations by the applicant Date of the applicant’s release from prison     715/19 14/03/2019 Florin-Mihai APARASCHIVEI 1991 31/07/2019 19/03/2021 02/04/2021 Signed for receipt by a relative 30/04/2021 08/02/2020     7909/19 21/03/2019 Constantin DOROBANŢU 1946 21/03/2019 19/03/2021 30/03/2021 Letter sent to the home address as requested by the applicant Signed for receipt by a relative 30/04/2021 In detention in Drobeta Turnu Severin Prison.     11766/19 18/03/2019 Ioan MARCO 1973 18/03/2019 19/03/2021 01/04/2021 Signed for receipt by a relative 30/04/2021 19/06/2019       11772/19 06/02/2019 Severin-Gheorghiță CIOCÎRLAN 1988 06/02/2019 19/03/2021 29/03/2021 Signed for receipt by a relative 30/04/2021 05/09/2020     17646/19 30/01/2020 Redvan-Neazin SALIM 1983 30/01/2020 19/03/2021 29/03/2021 Signed for receipt by the applicant 30/04/2021 12/05/2020     17987/19 21/03/2019 Cătălin-Alin URSACHE 1993 21/03/2019 19/03/2021 31/03/2021 Signed for receipt by the applicant 30/04/2021 19/07/2019     38920/19 09/09/2019 Costel BONTU 1987 09/09/2019 19/03/2021 29/03/2021 Signed for receipt by a relative 30/04/2021 29/10/2019     43974/19 22/01/2020 Gheorghe SZILAGY-KOVACS 1971 11/01/2021 26/03/2021 06/04/2021 Signed for receipt by the applicant 07/05/2021 In detention in Satu Mare Prison     46778/19 07/01/2020 Ştefan-Andrei FAZEKAŞ 1991 13/08/2020 19/03/2021 01/04/2021 Letter sent to the home address as requested by the applicant Illegible signature 30/04/2021 In detention in Vaslui Prison   48096/19 15/01/2020 Dumitru POP 1975 24/03/2020 26/03/2021 06/04/2021 Signed for receipt by the applicant 07/05/2021 In detention in Satu Mare Prison     7201/20 27/02/2020 Ionel CIOACĂ 1994 11/12/2020 31/03/2021 15/04/2021 Signed for receipt by a relative 12/05/2021 03/11/2020   7504/20 22/01/2020 Vasile RADU 1979 22/01/2020 31/03/2021 12/04/2021 Letter sent to the home address as requested by the applicant Signed for receipt by a relative 12/05/2021 Unknown   7592/20 20/02/2020 Ionuţ Daniel IVAŞCU 1988 15/07/2020 31/03/2021 12/04/2021 Signed for receipt by the Craiova Prison representative 12/05/2021 In detention in Craiova Prison     10499/20 16/03/2020 Romică POPESCU 1978 30/11/2020 26/07/2021 03/08/2021 Signed for receipt by the applicant 06/09/2021 21/11/2020   13128/20 05/05/2020 Mihai Ionuţ PĂRĂUŢĂ 1976 15/07/2020 26/07/2021 03/08/2021 Signed for receipt by the applicant 06/09/2021 22/12/2020