CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 10 novembre 2021

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5FFF0A75 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:7pt } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s7CB9076 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sF920FE69 { font-family:Arial; color:#f8f8f8 } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s241E80BF { width:7.44pt; display:inline-block } .s376CDD9C { width:117.08pt; display:inline-block } .sC30055DD { width:0.44pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .sF28C8B01 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .sA68E35A7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 54886/16 Levente CZINORI against Romania and 11 other applications (see appended table)   The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 10   November 2021 as a Committee composed of:   Armen Harutyunyan, President,   Jolien Schukking,   Ana Maria Guerra Martins, judges, and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants is set out in the appendix. The applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Romanian Government, who submitted observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicants, who were invited to submit their own observations. No reply was received by the Court. By letters sent by registered post, the applicants were notified that the time allowed for the submission of their observations had expired (see the appended table for the relevant dates). The applicants’ attention was further drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. No reply to these letters has been received by the Court (see details in the appended table) and there are no previous letters from the applicants informing the Court about a change of address. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. In the light of the foregoing, the Court concludes that the applicants may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue the applications (Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention). Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in   fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto which require the continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 2 December 2021.   {signature_p_2}   Viktoriya Maradudina   Armen Harutyunyan   Acting Deputy Registrar   President     APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article   3 of the Convention (inadequate conditions of detention)   No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Date of the applicant’s last letter to the Court Date of the Court’s registered letter Date of receipt of the registered letter New time-limit for submission of observations by the applicant Date of the applicant’s release from prison     54886/16 06/10/2016 Levente CZINORI 1974 03/10/2017   29/07/2021 Letter returned on 24/09/2021 as “unclaimed” 09/09/2021 12/09/2017     56255/18 07/01/2019 Constantin STĂNOI 1969 12/03/2019   05/07/2021 Handed over on 19/07/2021 (according to information on the website of the Romanian Post) 16/08/2021 19/06/2019     57167/18 08/04/2019 Francisc GIURCĂ 1976 15/04/2019   05/07/2021 19/07/2021 Signed by a relative of the applicant 16/08/2021 14/04/2020     18589/19 24/04/2019 Tică MUNTEANU 1984 12/08/2020   18/05/2021 Letter returned to sender on 08/06/2021 (according to information on the website of the Romanian Post) 29/06/2021 -     23729/19 19/06/2019 Maniu-Gheorghe DOMNESCU 1964 16/08/2019   05/07/2021 19/07/2021 Signed by the prison delegate 16/08/2021 -     25891/19 07/05/2019 Vasile NICOLAE 1955 14/05/2019   05/07/2021 16/07/2021 Signed by the applicant 16/08/2021 23/04/2019     49007/19 05/09/2019 Anghel-Paul MOLDOVAN 1997 12/09/2019 05/07/2021 20/07/2021 Signed by a relative of the applicant 16/08/2021 28/10/2019     53572/19 29/10/2019 Costică VÎJÎIAN 1966 18/03/2021   05/07/2021 Handed over on 20/07/2021 (according to information on the website of the Romanian Post) 16/08/2021 11/01/2021     58163/19 25/11/2019 Adi-Cătălin-Ioan CALOIAN 1992 02/09/2020   05/07/2021 19/07/2021 Illegible signature 16/08/2021 05/06/2020   59706/19 13/12/2019 Andrei-Mădălin SUCEVEANU 1989 16/10/2020 05/07/2021 Handed over on 20/07/2021 (according to information on the website of the Romanian Post) 16/08/2021 -   60811/19 22/10/2019 Ion PORUMBESCU 1976 18/11/2019   05/07/2021 19/07/2021 Signed by a relative of the applicant 16/08/2021 03/06/2020   62004/19 16/12/2019 Walter PUTIAN 1985 03/02/2021   05/07/2021 19/07/2021 Illegible signature 16/08/2021 20/01/2021