CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 25 novembre 2021

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .sBA32C63A { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4598CDF { width:70.9pt; display:inline-block } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .s376CDD9C { width:117.08pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s7B958E5 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:bottom } .s3A357E38 { text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 23681/16 Răzvan-Dormidont POPA against Romania and 10 other applications (see appended table)   The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 25   November 2021 as a Committee composed of:   Armen Harutyunyan, President,   Jolien Schukking,   Ana Maria Guerra Martins, judges, and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of the applicants is set out in the appendix. The applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Romanian Government, who submitted observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicants, who were invited to submit their own observations. No reply was received by the Court. By letters sent by registered post, the applicants were notified that the time allowed for the submission of their observations had expired (see the appended table for the relevant dates). The applicants’ attention was further drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. No reply to these letters has been received by the Court (see details in the appended table). THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. In the light of the foregoing, the Court concludes that the applicants may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue the applications (Article 37 §   1 (a) of the Convention). Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in   fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto which require the continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 16 December 2021.     Viktoriya Maradudina   Armen Harutyunyan   Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article   3 of the Convention (inadequate conditions of detention) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Representative’s name and location Date of the applicant’s last letter to the Court Date of the Court’s registered letter Date of receipt of the registered letter New time-limit for submission of observations by the applicant Date of the applicant’s release from prison     23681/16 03/06/2016 Răzvan-Dormidont POPA 1984     01/02/2017 02/03/2021 15/03/2021 Signed by – illegible signature 13/04/2021 According to the Government, the applicant was still in detention on 11/02/2021     26159/16 08/07/2016 Dumitrel ZAHARIA 1984     08/07/2016 09/08/2021 04/09/2021 According to the Post Service, returned to sender 20/09/2021 05/07/2016     26677/16 22/08/2016 Gheorghe IVAN 1973     15/11/2016 09/08/2021 18/08/2021 Signed by – illegible signature 20/09/2021 01/11/2016       27161/16 02/06/2016 Gabriel-Cozmin ALUPULUI 1990     13/09/2016 09/08/2021 19/08/2021 Returned to sender as the addressee moved to another address 20/09/2021 26/04/2017       31824/16 23/06/2016 Petrică-Adrian ALEXA 1977     08/09/2016 09/08/2021 27/08/2021 Signed for by – illegible signature 20/09/2021 18/10/2016       34404/16 25/07/2016 Georgică IOVA 1980     05/12/2016 02/03/2021 15/03/2021 Signed for by – illegible signature 13/04/2021 14/08/2019       38454/16 27/09/2016 Cristian Marin VLĂDOIU 1990 Elena Talica Strejești 31/07/2017 09/08/2021 18/08/2021 Signed for by – illegible signature   20/09/2021 09/05/2017       39555/16 06/02/2017 Costel ȚURCAN 1978     23/01/2019 29/07/2021 02/08/2021 The letter was returned to sender 09/09/2021   21/09/2017     39595/16 05/08/2016 Leontin VASILE 1969     25/10/2017 29/07/2021 09/08/2021 Signed for by – illegible signature 09/09/2021 12/10/2017   43918/16 16/08/2016 Ștefan COȚEA 1975     16/08/2016 29/07/2021 30/08/2021 According to the Post Service, returned to sender 09/09/2021 03/05/2017   47628/16 08/09/2016 Vasile MURGU 1979     03/11/2016 23/07/2021 02/08/2021 According to the Post Service, delivered to addressee 03/09/2021 12/05/2017