CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 25 novembre 2021

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4598CDF { width:70.9pt; display:inline-block } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .s319372BC { width:122.43pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7FDD75C9 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; letter-spacing:-0.2pt; color:#474747 } .s598389F9 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:12pt } .sB5B1C99F { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sD35D798C { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s21DBC5B4 { height:138.75pt } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .sB343B0AA { font-family:Arial; font-size:6.67pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 25120/20 Roberto MAMBELLI against Italy and 11 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 25   November 2021 as a Committee composed of:   Erik Wennerström, President,   Lorraine Schembri Orland,   Ioannis Ktistakis, judges, and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the declarations submitted by the respondent Government requesting the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases, and the applicants’ replies to these declarations, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants is set out in the appended table. The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article   1 of Protocol No.   1 concerning the non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic decisions were communicated to the Italian Government (“the Government”). The Government submitted declarations with a view to resolving the issues raised by these complaints. They further requested the Court to strike out the applications. The Government acknowledged the non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic decisions. They offered to pay the applicants the amounts detailed in the appended table and invited the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases in accordance with Article   37 §   1   (c) of the Convention. The amounts would be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The Government also undertook to ensure the enforcement of the domestic decisions under consideration in the cases concerned (see appended table) within the same three-month period, where the final judgments have remained unenforced. The payment and, where relevant, the enforcement of the domestic decisions in the cases concerned will constitute the final resolution of the cases. The applicants informed the Court that they agreed to the terms of the declarations. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Court finds that, following the applicants’ express agreement to the terms of the declaration made by the Government, the cases should be treated as a friendly settlement between the parties. It therefore takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify the continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article   39 of the Convention. Done in English and notified in writing on 16 December 2021.     Viktoriya Maradudina   Erik Wennerström   Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic decisions) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Representative’s name and location Relevant domestic decision Date of receipt of Government’s declaration Date of receipt of applicant’s acceptance Amount awarded for non-pecuniary damage per applicant (in euros) [1] Amount awarded for costs and expenses per application (in euros) [2]     25120/20 15/06/2020 Roberto MAMBELLI 1963 Di Battista Giovanni Rome Perugia Court of Appeal R.G. 1270/2012, 29/08/2017 29/09/2021 11/10/2021 200 30     25125/20 15/06/2020 Ivana ALESSANDRINI 1960 Di Battista Giovanni Rome Perugia Court of Appeal R.G. 1270/2012, 29/08/2017 29/09/2021 11/10/2021 200 30     25174/20 18/06/2020 Benedetto VITALI 1945 Di Battista Giovanni Rome Perugia Court of Appeal R.G. 1270/2012, 29/08/2017 29/09/2021 11/10/2021 200 30     25331/20 16/06/2020 Umberto COLITTI 1960 Di Battista Giovanni Rome Perugia Court of Appeal, R.G. 1270/2012, 29/08/2017 29/09/2021 11/10/2021 200 30     25733/20 15/06/2020 Claudio PASSARELLI 1951 Di Battista Giovanni Rome Perugia Court of Appeal R.G. 1270/2012, 29/08/2017 29/09/2021 11/10/2021 200 30     26840/20 22/06/2020 Iside RUSCITTI 1955 Di Battista Giovanni   Rome Perugia Court of Appeal R.G. 1270/2012, 29/08/2017 29/09/2021 11/10/2021 200 30     42148/20 18/09/2020 Silvestro CERVERA 1969 Pasquariello Gianpiero Caserta Rome Court of Appeal R.G. 51396/17, 19/12/2017 29/09/2021 15/10/2021 200 30     42153/20 18/09/2020 Paolo ALBANESE 1972 Pasquariello Gianpiero Caserta Naples Court of Appeal R.G. 2027/2017, 05/01/2018 29/09/2021 15/10/2021 200 30     42165/20 18/09/2020 (4 applicants) Nicola MARRANDINO 1956 Mario MARRANDINO 1958 Margherita FIORENTINO 1962 Marcella PALMIERI 1959 Pasquariello Gianpiero Caserta Perugia Court of Appeal R.G. 5390/2012, 25/05/2017 29/09/2021 15/10/2021 200 30   42168/20 18/09/2020 (2 applicants) Antonio MOTTOLA 1954 Mario MOTTOLA 1959 Pasquariello Gianpiero Caserta Naples Court of Appeal R.G. 2083/18, 09/05/2019 29/09/2021 15/10/2021 200 30   8482/21 29/01/2021 Daniela ALI’ 1975 Riello Piero Caserta Naples Court of Appeal R.G. 1581/2018, 07/08/2018 29/09/2021 14/10/2021 200 30   11343/21 13/02/2021 Brigida PELOSI 1966 Pulcino Teresina San Lupo Naples Court of Appeal R.G. 1960/2017, 16/01/2018 29/09/2021 28/10/2021 200 30   [1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants. [2] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.