CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 9 décembre 2021

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4598CDF { width:70.9pt; display:inline-block } .s22DFA96B { width:28.86pt; display:inline-block } .sC986E16F { font-family:Arial; color:#ffffff } .sC5599237 { width:142.72pt; display:inline-block } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .s376CDD9C { width:117.08pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .sF28C8B01 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 35204/16 Marius-Sebastian SIMA against Romania and 10 other applications (see appended table)   The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 9   December 2021 as a Committee composed of:   Armen Harutyunyan, President,   Jolien Schukking,   Ana Maria Guerra Martins, judges, and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of the applicants is set out in the appendix. The applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Romanian Government, who submitted observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicants, who were invited to submit their own observations. No reply was received by the Court. By letters sent by registered post, the applicants were notified that the time allowed for the submission of their observations had expired (see the appended table for the relevant dates). The applicants’ attention was further drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. No reply to these letters has been received by the Court (see details in the appended table) and there are no previous letters from the applicants informing the Court about the change of address. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. In the light of the foregoing, the Court concludes that the applicants may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue the applications (Article   37 §   1   (a) of the Convention). Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 §   1 in   fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto which require the continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 13   January 2022.     {signature_p_1}   {signature_p_2}   Viktoriya Maradudina   Armen Harutyunyan   Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX   Application raising complaints under Article   3 of the Convention (inadequate conditions of detention)   No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Representative’s name and location Date of the applicant’s last letter to the Court Date of the Court’s registered letter Date of receipt of the registered letter New time-limit for submission of observations by the applicant Date of the applicant’s release from prison     35204/16 29/09/2016 Marius-Sebastian SIMA 1977     10/08/2018 29/07/2021 Letter returned on 14/09/2021 as “unclaimed” 09/09/2021 28/02/2017     37287/16 22/08/2016 Vasilică CĂMĂRUȚ 1981     20/10/2017 29/07/2021 Handed over on 10/08/2021 (according to information on the website of the Romanian Post) 09/09/2021 10/10/2017     44521/16 16/09/2016 Laszlo IOVANOVICI 1967     13/07/2017 23/08/2021 Letter returned on 20/10/2021 as “unclaimed” 04/10/2021 20/06/2017     53395/16 04/01/2017 Vasilică CHELARU 1973     17/10/2017 29/07/2021 Letter returned on 14/09/2021 as “moved from address” 09/09/2021 15/09/2017     55610/16 11/10/2016 Ionel CRISTEA 1978     07/08/2017 29/07/2021 Handed over on 06/08/2021 (according to information on the website of the Romanian Post) 09/09/2021 04/05/2017     15345/17 09/03/2017 Ionel IRIMIA 1972     18/09/2017 23/08/2021 Letter returned on 12/10/2021 as “unclaimed” 04/10/2021 08/09/2017     67717/17 08/09/2017 Bogdan-Nicolae CIOTÂRNEL 1981 Violeta Oancea Bucharest 13/09/2017 23/08/2021 Letter returned on 28/10/2021 as “unclaimed” 04/10/2021 30/03/2017     17561/20 20/05/2020 Lazăr STOICA 1976     05/06/2020 23/07/2021 04/08/2021 Illegible signature 03/09/2021 04/06/2020     20364/20 04/08/2020 Cosmin Florea DOMNIŢI 1988     21/08/2020 23/07/2021 03/08/2021 Illegible signature 03/09/2021 23/12/2020   21924/20 31/07/2020 Andrei-Ionel SLABU 1992     13/08/2020 23/07/2021 Handed over on 06/08/2021 (according to information on the website of the Romanian Post) 03/09/2021 19/09/2020   28807/20 12/08/2020 Valentin-Ionuţ NATU 1993     21/08/2020 23/07/2021 02/08/2021 Illegible signature 03/09/2021 04/10/2020