CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 9 décembre 2021

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4598CDF { width:70.9pt; display:inline-block } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .s376CDD9C { width:117.08pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .s7D04627 { height:62.7pt }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 36217/16 Marian IACOB against Romania and 8 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 9   December 2021 as a Committee composed of:   Armen Harutyunyan, President,   Jolien Schukking,   Ana Maria Guerra Martins, judges, and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of the applicants is set out in the appendix. The applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Romanian Government, who submitted observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicants, who were invited to submit their own observations. No reply was received by the Court. By letters sent by registered post, the applicants were notified that the time allowed for the submission of their observations had expired (see the appended table for the relevant dates). The applicants’ attention was further drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. No reply to these letters has been received by the Court (see details in the appended table). THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. In the light of the foregoing, the Court concludes that the applicants may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue the applications (Article   37 §   1   (a) of the Convention). Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 §   1 in   fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto which require the continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 13 January 2022.     Viktoriya Maradudina   Armen Harutyunyan   Acting Deputy Registrar   President   APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article   3 of the Convention (inadequate conditions of detention) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Date of the applicant’s last letter to the Court Date of the Court’s registered letter Date of receipt of the registered letter New time-limit for submission of observations by the applicant Date of the applicant’s release from prison     36217/16 19/07/2016 Marian IACOB 1986 05/05/2020   24/03/2021 07/04/2021 Signed for receipt by the Brăila Prison representative   08/04/2021 Signed for receipt by the applicant’s mother   05/05/2021 In detention in Brăila Prison according to the Government’s observations of 13/02/2020     41974/16 08/08/2016 Cornel-Ioan ZĂGREAN 1983 08/08/2016   24/03/2021 08/04/2021 Signed for receipt by the applicant’s mother   08/04/2021 Signed for receipt by the Bistrița Prison representative   05/05/2021 In detention in Bistrița Prison according to the Government’s observations of 09/01/2020     31265/18 17/08/2018 Gheorghe Vijai BOROȘ 1988 17/08/2018   06/05/2021 Returned to the Court on 02/06/2021 (according to the official website of Romania’s Postal Service) Letter sent to the correspondence address indicated by the applicant 17/06/2021 30/01/2019     50297/18 12/11/2018 Vasile-Ionuț FERARU 1982 12/11/2018   12/05/2021 08/06/2021 Signed for receipt by the Slobozia Prison representative   23/06/2021 In detention in Slobozia Prison     30641/19 27/05/2019 Dumitru STAMATESCU 1977 05/10/2020   31/05/2021 15/06/2021 Signed for receipt by the Arad Prison representative   12/07/2021 In detention in Arad Prison     59089/19 03/12/2019 Georgian-Daniel COTIGĂ 1998   24/02/2020   31/05/2021 Handed over to the applicant on 14/06/2021 (according to the official website of Romania’s Postal Service)   12/07/2021 In detention in Mioveni Prison according to the Government’s observations of 15/01/2021     61929/19 30/12/2019 Dénes BARTHA 1994 25/11/2020   31/05/2021 14/06/2021 Signed for receipt by the Gherla Prison representative     12/07/2021 In detention in Gherla Prison according to the Government’s observations of 15/01/2021     8223/20 04/03/2020 Constantin MOISE 1983 25/01/2021   18/06/2021 01/07/2021 Handed over to the applicant (according to the official website of Romania’s Postal Service)     30/07/2021 In detention in Mărgineni Prison     13132/20 26/03/2020 Nicolae CIUCĂ 1987 26/03/2020   14/06/2021 21/07/2021 Signed for receipt by the Craiova Prison representative     26/06/2021 In detention in Craiova Prison according to the Government’s observations of 15/01/2021