CEDHCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG28
CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 9 décembre 2021
- ECLI
- ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1209DEC004632716
- Date
- 9 décembre 2021
- Publication
- 9 décembre 2021
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleStruck out of the list
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4598CDF { width:70.9pt; display:inline-block } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .s376CDD9C { width:117.08pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 46327/16 Ioan FĂȚAN against Romania The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 9   December 2021 as a Committee composed of:   Armen Harutyunyan, President,   Jolien Schukking,   Ana Maria Guerra Martins, judges, and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 27   December 2016, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The applicant, Mr Ioan Fățan, was born in 1947. On 3 December 2020 the Court delivered a decision in a group of cases, which included the current application (see Mircea and Others v. Romania , (dec.) [Committee], nos. 19480/16 and 4 other applications), and decided to strike the application out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 37 §   1 (c) of the Convention on the basis of a unilateral declaration submitted by the Romanian Government (“the Government”), acknowledging a violation of Article 3 of the Convention due to the applicant’s inadequate conditions of detention and awarding him 2,700 euros (EUR) in respect of pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses. On 13 April 2021 the Government made a request to restore the application to the Court’s list of cases, as during the enforcement of the Court’s decision, they had learned that the applicant had died on 8   January 2019 and no heir had manifested an intention to pursue the proceedings before the Court in the applicant’s place. On 20 May 2021 the Court decided, under Rule 43 § 5 of the Rules of the Court, to disjoin the current application from those to which it had been joined (see above) and to restore it to its list of cases, considering the fact of the applicant’s death. By letters dated 25 May and 27 August 2021, sent by registered post, the applicant’s potential heirs were notified that the application had been restored to the Court’s list of cases. They were invited, in particular, to inform the Court whether they wished to pursue the application before the Court. They were asked to provide that information by 6 July 2021, a time ‑ limit which was subsequently extended to 24 September 2021. Their attention was drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that they do not intend to pursue the application. The letters were delivered to the applicant’s potential heirs on 15   June and 8   September 2021. No reply was received by the Court to date. THE LAW In the light of the foregoing, the Court concludes that the applicant’s potential heirs do not wish to pursue the application within the meaning of Article   37 §   1   (a) of the Convention. Accordingly, the case should be struck out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 13 January 2022.     Viktoriya Maradudina   Armen Harutyunyan   Acting Deputy Registrar   President  Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
- Formation
- 28
- Date
- 9 décembre 2021
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1209DEC004632716
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral