CEDHCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG29
CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 20 janvier 2022
- ECLI
- ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0120DEC002640210
- Date
- 20 janvier 2022
- Publication
- 20 janvier 2022
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleStruck out of the list
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s61E420C2 { font-family:Arial; font-variant:small-caps } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4598CDF { width:70.9pt; display:inline-block } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .sF5B27E79 { width:130.75pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block }   FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 26402/10 Igor Aleksandrovich MYASOYED against Ukraine The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 20   January 2022 as a Committee composed of:   Lətif Hüseynov, President,   Lado Chanturia,   Arnfinn Bårdsen , judges and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 11   March 2010, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The applicant, Mr Igor Aleksandrovich Myasoyed, was born in 1945. The applicant’s complaints under Articles 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 13, 14 and 17 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention regarding mainly the conduct and outcome of the criminal proceedings against the applicant in 2006-2010 and related defamation proceedings in 2008-2011 were communicated to the Ukrainian Government (“the Government”). In 2017 the case was adjourned as no correspondence could be delivered to the applicant, whose last known address was in Donetsk, which has been outside the control of the Government of Ukraine since July 2014 and where the Ukrainian postal service has suspended its operations (see Tsezar and Others v. Ukraine , nos. 73590/14 and 6 others, § 9, 13   February 2018). Using telephone numbers the applicant had indicated in his application form, it was only possible to contact his sister who provided an email address through which the applicant allegedly could be reached. She gave no other contact information. On 21 June 2021 the Registry sent an email inviting the applicant to submit updated information regarding his case. The applicant’s attention was drawn to Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. No reply was given to that letter. The Registry has not received any correspondence from the applicant since April 2012. THE LAW In the light of the foregoing, and in the absence of any special circumstances regarding respect for the rights guaranteed by the Convention and the Protocols thereto, the Court, in accordance with Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention, considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the application. Accordingly, the case should be struck out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 10 February 2022.     Viktoriya Maradudina   Lətif Hüseynov   Acting Deputy Registrar   President  Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
- Formation
- 29
- Date
- 20 janvier 2022
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0120DEC002640210
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral