CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 10 mars 2022

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4598CDF { width:70.9pt; display:inline-block } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .s3DF5EF88 { width:128.75pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s23860FF7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sDF1BC9E3 { width:108.58%; border-collapse:collapse } .s31FD263B { height:27.1pt } .s299A36D8 { width:6.76%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:middle; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2E932ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:11pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s6E262277 { width:32.26%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:middle; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s26FEA895 { width:20.9%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:middle; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s318C66C7 { width:15.9%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:middle; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sF0ACD43B { width:24.18%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:middle; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s803FC036 { width:6.76%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF133FDD3 { width:32.26%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s88AC54B5 { width:20.9%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s305A9B13 { width:15.9%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sA54EAEFE { width:24.18%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sCA4A099D { width:6.76%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s85AC135D { width:32.26%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sFB8E93C9 { width:20.9%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s3FAF4342 { width:15.9%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sB3BD773E { width:24.18%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf }   THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 34961/21 Anastasiya Vladimirovna DENISOVA and Ilona Leonidovna BERNGARDT against Russia (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 10 March 2022 as a Committee composed of:   Peeter Roosma, President,   Andreas Zünd,   Mikhail Lobov, judges, and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 20   June 2021, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of the applicants is set out in the appendix. The applicants are mother and daughter. Complaints concerning a situation of alleged domestic violence were communicated to the Russian Government. By letter of 11   February 2022 the applicants informed the Registry that they did not wish that the Court pursue the examination of the application. They stated that they had never signed the application form lodged allegedly on their behalf by a third party. THE LAW In the light of the foregoing, the Court concludes that the applicants may be regarded as not wishing to pursue the application (Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention). Furthermore, in accordance with Article   37   §   1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto which require the continued examination of the application. Accordingly, the case should be struck out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 28 July 2022.     Viktoriya Maradudina   Peeter Roosma   Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX   List of applicants   No. Applicant’s Name Year of birth Nationality Place of residence 1. Anastasiya Vladimirovna DENISOVA 1988 Russian Uyar 2. Ilona Leonidovna BERNGARDT   2010 Russian Uyar