CEDHCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG28
CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 24 mars 2022
- ECLI
- ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0324DEC006052017
- Date
- 24 mars 2022
- Publication
- 24 mars 2022
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleStruck out of the list
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s22DFA96B { width:28.86pt; display:inline-block } .sC986E16F { font-family:Arial; color:#ffffff } .sC5599237 { width:142.72pt; display:inline-block } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .s376CDD9C { width:117.08pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7FDD75C9 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; letter-spacing:-0.2pt; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .s3A3C6A58 { height:2.1pt } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .sC36A6361 { font-family:Arial; color:#000000 } FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 60520/17 Nikolay Vladov SMILENOV against Bulgaria (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 24   March 2022 as a Committee composed of:   Armen Harutyunyan, President ,   Jolien Schukking,   Ana Maria Guerra Martins, judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar , Having regard to: the above application lodged on 7 August 2017, the declaration submitted by the respondent Government requesting the Court to strike the application out of its list of cases, and the reply of the applicant’s heir to this declaration, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The applicant’s details are set out in the appended table. The applicant, and after his death his only heir, were represented by Mr   V.   Stoyanov, a lawyer practising in Pazardzhik. The Bulgarian Government (“the Government”) were given notice of the applicant’s complaints under Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention concerning the allegedly inhuman and degrading conditions of his detention and the alleged lack of an effective remedy in that respect. The Government submitted a unilateral declaration in which they acknowledged the violations of Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention and offered to pay the applicant the amounts set out in the appended table. On that basis, they invited the Court to strike the application out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (c) of the Convention. The amounts would be converted into Bulgarian levs at the rate applicable on the date of payment and be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay those amounts within that three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment would constitute the final resolution of the case. The applicant died while the proceedings before the Court were pending. His son and only heir (see the table below) stated that he wished to pursue the application in his stead. The Government accepted that the applicant’s heir could do so and undertook to pay the amounts set out in the appended table to him. The applicant’s heir informed the Court that he agreed to the terms of the Government’s declaration. THE LAW The applicant died while the proceedings were pending, and his son and only heir wishes to pursue the application in his stead. The Government did not object to that. There is no reason to hold that the applicant’s heir, whose details are set out in appended table, is not entitled to pursue the application in the applicant’s stead. Since the applicant’s heir expressly agreed to the terms of the declaration made by the Government, the parties may be considered to have reached a friendly settlement. The Court takes note of that friendly settlement. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols to it, and thus finds no reasons justifying the continued examination of the application. It is hence appropriate to strike the case out of the Court’s list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides that the applicant’s son and only heir can pursue the application; Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention. Done in English and notified in writing on 14 April 2022.   {signature_p_1}   {signature_p_2}   Viktoriya Maradudina   Armen Harutyunyan   Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX Application raising complaints under Article 3 of the Convention (inadequate conditions of detention) Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Representative’s name and location Date of receipt of Government’s declaration Date of receipt of applicant’s acceptance Amount offered for non-pecuniary damage (in euros) [1] Amount offered for costs and expenses (in euros) [2] 60520/17 07/08/2017 Nikolay Vladov SMILENOV 1981   (died on 13 November 2019, only heir Vladimir Nikolaev Smilenov (son, born in 2003)) Valeri Stoyanov Pazardzhik 12/07/2021 21/08/2021 1,400 250   [1] .     Plus any tax that may be chargeable [2] .     Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicantCitations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
- Formation
- 28
- Date
- 24 mars 2022
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0324DEC006052017
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral