CEDHCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG28
CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 19 mai 2022
- ECLI
- ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0519DEC000580219
- Date
- 19 mai 2022
- Publication
- 19 mai 2022
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleStruck out of the list
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s38729B7C { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold } .sB853CD26 { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s46DB5BA6 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s7CB9076 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s4598CDF { width:70.9pt; display:inline-block } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .s376CDD9C { width:117.08pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7FDD75C9 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; letter-spacing:-0.2pt; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .s26725EEE { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sCD8FE8B1 { height:47.6pt } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .sB343B0AA { font-family:Arial; font-size:6.67pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 } .s8EB5F569 { font-family:Arial; font-size:6.67pt; vertical-align:super }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 5802/19 Fatima ČORBIĆ against Bosnia and Herzegovina and 17 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 19 May 2022 as a Committee composed of:   Armen Harutyunyan, President,   Jolien Schukking,   Ana Maria Guerra Martins, judges, and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants and their representatives is set out in the appended table. The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of civil and administrative proceedings and under Article 13 of the Convention concerning the lack of an effective remedy for complaints about the length of pending proceedings (see Delić v. Bosnia and Herzegovina , no. 59181/18, 2 March 2021), were communicated to the Government of Bosnia and Herzegovina (“the Government”). Following the death of the applicant, Mr Brajko Husanović (application no. 28280/19), his heir, Derviša Husanović, declared her wish to pursue the application in his stead. The Government did not object. Having regard to its well-established case-law in this respect (see   Malhous v. the Czech Republic   (dec.) [GC], no. 33071/96, ECHR 2000-XII, and   Murray v. the Netherlands   [GC], no. 10511/10, § 79, ECHR 2016, with further references), the Court accepts that Mrs Husanović,   has standing   to pursue the application on behalf of late Mr Brajko Husanović. The Court received the friendly-settlement declarations, signed by the parties, under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Bosnia and Herzegovina in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table. These amounts will be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides   that Ms Derviša Husanović, the heir of the late applicant, Mr   Brajko Husanović (application no. 28280/19), has   locus standi   in the proceedings; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article   39 of the Convention. Done in English and notified in writing on 9 June 2022.     Viktoriya Maradudina   Armen Harutyunyan   Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article   6 § 1 of the Convention (excessive length of civil and/or administrative proceedings) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Representative’s name and location Other complaints under well-established case-law   Date of receipt of Government’s declaration Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration Amount awarded for non-pecuniary damage per applicant (in euros) [1] 2 Amount awarded for costs and expenses per application (in euros) 3     5802/19 26/12/2018 Fatima ČORBIĆ 1959 Salkanović Haris Živinice Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of pending proceedings 01/04/2022 20/12/2021 1,500 250     6369/19 24/12/2018 Šefik DELIĆ 1957 Salkanović Haris Živinice Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of pending proceedings 01/04/2022 20/12/2021 600 250     15124/19 04/03/2019 Željko SUBOTIĆ 1965   Boško VITKOVIĆ 1954 Ljubojević-Đurić Rafaela Gradiška Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of pending proceedings 17/02/2022 19/01/2022 10,100 250     21462/19 10/04/2019 Emir RAŠČIĆ 1966 Eterović Omar Sarajevo Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of pending proceedings 09/02/2022 07/04/2022 2,700 250     21467/19 10/04/2019 Bajram PEŠKOVIĆ 1963 Eterović Omar Sarajevo Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of pending proceedings 09/02/2022 07/04/2022 1,200 250     21474/19 10/04/2019 Jasmina ŠEKO 1959 Eterović Omar Sarajevo Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of pending proceedings 09/02/2022 07/04/2022 2,700 250     21479/19 10/04/2019 Mervana HADŽIMURTEZIĆ 1957 Eterović Omar Sarajevo Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of pending proceedings 09/02/2022 07/04/2022 2,300 250     23686/19 19/04/2019 Mehmed BEKTO 1952   Azem ĐIP 1960 Eterović Omar Sarajevo Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of pending proceedings 09/02/2022 07/04/2022 2,000 250     23704/19 19/04/2019 Maja DRMAĆ 1964 Eterović Omar Sarajevo Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of pending proceedings 09/02/2022 07/04/2022 2,700 250   23741/19 23/04/2019 Šćepan RAGUŽ 1955 Eterović Omar Sarajevo Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of pending proceedings 09/02/2022 07/04/2022 2,300 250   23754/19 23/04/2019 Emina SELMAN 1964 Eterović Omar Sarajevo Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of pending proceedings 09/02/2022 07/04/2022 2,300 250   28280/19 14/05/2019 Brajko HUSANOVIĆ Year of birth: 1964 Date of death: 01/01/2022   Pursued by heir: Derviša Husanović 1953 Salkanović Haris Živinice Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of pending proceedings   01/04/2022 20/12/2021 1,200, to be paid to the applicant’s heir Derviša Husanović   250   32409/19 11/06/2019 Pejo JANJIĆ 1965 Eterović Omar Sarajevo Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of pending proceedings 09/02/2022 07/04/2022 2,700 250   47119/19 28/08/2019 (3 applicants) Ramiz DŽAFEROVIĆ 1959   Belma IZMIRLIJA /   Dubravka BOŠNJAK / Galijatović Alija Sarajevo Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of pending proceedings 09/02/2022 21/12/2021 2,000 250   7627/20 13/01/2020 Edis MUJKANOVIĆ 1981 Salkanović Haris Živinice Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of pending proceedings 01/04/2022 20/12/2021 2,000 250   25867/20 18/03/2020 Ahmet HALILOVIĆ 1944 Hadžiomerović Dženana Sarajevo Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of pending proceedings 09/02/2022 13/04/2022 5,400 250   51233/20 03/11/2020 Nusret ŠABANOVIĆ 1962 Salkanović Haris Živinice Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of pending proceedings 01/04/2022 20/12/2021 1,200 250   51437/20 02/11/2020 Denis MUJKIĆ 1983 Salkanović Haris Živinice Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of pending proceedings 01/04/2022 20/12/2021 2,000 250   [1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants. 2 Less any amounts which may have already been paid in that regard at the domestic level. 3 Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
- Formation
- 28
- Date
- 19 mai 2022
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0519DEC000580219
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral