CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 19 mai 2022

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4598CDF { width:70.9pt; display:inline-block } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .s376CDD9C { width:117.08pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s51433B4A { height:100.4pt } .s38135D7A { height:29.25pt }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 19802/16 Adi-Florin PIŞINARU against Romania and 14 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 19   May   2022 as a Committee composed of:   Armen Harutyunyan, President,   Jolien Schukking,   Ana Maria Guerra Martins, judges, and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of the applicants is set out in the appendix. The applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Romanian Government, who submitted observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicants, who were invited to submit their own observations. No reply was received by the Court. By letters sent by registered post, the applicants were notified that the time allowed for the submission of their observations had expired (see the appended table for the relevant dates). The applicants’ attention was further drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. No reply to these letters has been received by the Court (see details in the appended table) and there are no previous letters from the applicants informing the Court about the change of address. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. In the light of the foregoing, the Court concludes that the applicants may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue the applications (Article 37 § 1   (a) of the Convention). Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto which require the continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 9 June 2022.     Viktoriya Maradudina   Armen Harutyunyan   Acting Deputy Registrar   President   APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article   3 of the Convention (inadequate conditions of detention) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Date of the applicant’s last letter to the Court Date of the Court’s registered letter Date of receipt of the registered letter New time-limit for submission of observations by the applicant Date of the applicant’s release from prison     19802/16 03/06/2016 Adi-Florin PIŞINARU 1988 26/03/2019   04/12/2020 16/12/2020 Signed for receipt by the applicant’s mother-in-law 15/01/2021 27/03/2018     28625/16 08/09/2016 Ioan LOGA 1975 19/08/2019   12/08/2021 Letter returned to sender on 31/08/2021 (according to information on the website of the Romanian Post) 23/09/2021 09/05/2017     38886/16 01/08/2016 Zoltán BALÁZS 1975 14/10/2016   04/12/2020 17/12/2020 Signed for receipt by the applicant 15/01/2021 13/03/2018     38938/16 25/07/2016 Sorin FELNECAN 1972 03/10/2018   04/12/2020 06/01/2021 Handed over to the recipient (according to information on the website of the Romanian Post) 15/01/2021 14/05/2019     78762/16 08/03/2017 Petre BREAZU 1968 20/06/2017   06/08/2021 12/08/2021 Handed over to the recipient (according to information on the website of the French Post)   17/09/2021 23/05/2017     79466/16 30/03/2017 Remus VÎNT 1975 21/12/2020   21/09/2021 06/10/2021 Signed for receipt by Aiud prison’s representative 02/11/2021 -     5215/17 09/02/2017 Vasile BOBRIUC 1979 17/05/2017   24/03/2021 Letter returned to sender both from Timișoara prison on 12/05/2021 as recipient “released” and from the applicant’s home address on 19/04/2021 as “unclaimed” (according to information on the website of the Romanian Post) 05/05/2021 24/02/2021     54638/19 05/11/2019 Robert-George STAN 1982 06/02/2020     12/08/2021 Letter returned to sender on 02/09/2021 as “unclaimed” (according to information on the website of the Romanian Post) 23/09/2021 27/01/2020     63085/19 20/12/2019 Cristian MIHALACHE 1978 01/09/2020   12/10/2021 27/10/2021 Signed for receipt by București-Jilava prison’s representative 23/11/2021 -   5023/20 06/02/2020 Minas CHATZIKONSTANTIS 1972 09/07/2021   25/08/2021 14/10/2021 Handed over to the recipient (according to information on the website of the German Post) 06/10/2021 25/06/2021   10303/20 02/06/2020 Constantin BENZINĂ 1977 22/09/2020   13/08/2021 31/08/2021 Signed for receipt by Târgu Jiu prison’s representative   24/09/2021 -   10467/20 09/03/2020 Marius-Ionică DOGARIU 1996 11/12/2020   26/02/2021 10/03/2021 Signed for receipt by the applicant’s brother   09/04/2021 17/06/2020   18806/20 09/06/2020 Alexandru ANGHEL 1992 01/09/2020   13/08/2021 30/08/2021 Illegible signature 24/09/2021 -   19245/20 22/04/2020 Ştefan PĂDURE 1985 17/07/2020   12/08/2021 26/08/2021 Illegible signature 23/09/2021 -   31250/20 06/08/2020 Petronela MUNTEANU 1967 01/02/2021   13/08/2021 31/08/2021 Signed for receipt by Gherla prison’s representative 24/09/2021   -