CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 19 mai 2022

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4598CDF { width:70.9pt; display:inline-block } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .s376CDD9C { width:117.08pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 34089/16 Narcis-Romulus PĂTRU against Romania and 9 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 19   May 2022 as a Committee composed of:   Armen Harutyunyan, President,   Jolien Schukking,   Ana Maria Guerra Martins, judges, and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of the applicants is set out in the appendix. The applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Romanian Government, who submitted observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicants, who were invited to submit their own observations. No reply was received by the Court. By letters sent by registered post, the applicants were notified that the time allowed for the submission of their observations had expired (see the appended table for the relevant dates). The applicants’ attention was further drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. No reply to these letters has been received by the Court (see details in the appended table) and there are no previous letters from the applicants informing the Court about the change of address. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. In the light of the foregoing, the Court concludes that the applicants may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue the applications (Article 37 § 1   (a) of the Convention). Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto which require the continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 9 June 2022.     Viktoriya Maradudina   Armen Harutyunyan   Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article   3 of the Convention (inadequate conditions of detention)   No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Representative’s name and location Date of the applicant’s last letter to the Court Date of the Court’s registered letter Date of receipt of the registered letter New time-limit for submission of observations by the applicant Date of the applicant’s release from prison     34089/16 14/10/2016 Narcis-Romulus PĂTRU 1970     01/02/2018 31/01/2022 07/02/2022 Signed by the applicant 14/03/2022 27/06/2017     34796/16 11/07/2016 Elvis-Nicolae IONEL 1984     26/09/2017 31/01/2022 08/02/2022 Signed by the prison representative 14/03/2022 -     53884/17 17/07/2017 Ergean SULIMAN 1994 Andreea-Gabriela Cadar Galați 30/06/2021 31/01/2022 Downloaded from eComms on 31/01/2022 and 03/02/2022 14/03/2022 27/04/2017     54377/17 18/07/2017 Bebi SIMA 1977 Andreea-Gabriela Cadar Galați 30/06/2021 31/01/2022 Downloaded from eComms on 03/02/2022 14/03/2022 18/01/2017     54384/17 21/07/2017 Sorin Ștefan ZOLTAN 1970 Andreea-Gabriela Cadar Galați 30/06/2021 31/01/2022 Downloaded from eComms on 31/01/2022 and 03/02/2022 14/03/2022 07/05/2019     54397/17 20/07/2017 Aureliu TUDOR 1976 Andreea-Gabriela Cadar Galați 30/06/2021 31/01/2022 Downloaded from eComms on 31/01/2022 and 03/02/2022 14/03/2022 29/01/2018     25539/19 13/06/2019 Adrian GHEORGHE 1976     25/06/2019 19/10/2021 Letter returned to sender on 10/11/2021 (according to information on the website of the Romanian Post)   30/11/2021 23/11/2019     28887/20 21/08/2020 Marian IOSIF 1978     13/11/2020 10/01/2022 28/01/2022 Signed by the applicant’s wife 21/02/2022 -     29568/20 24/08/2020 Alexandru Nicolae MOISE 1995     01/09/2020 15/12/2021 Letter returned to sender on 23/12/2021 (according to information on the website of the Romanian Post) 26/01/2022 -   33178/20 28/07/2020 Mihai LUCA 1980     22/02/2021 30/11/2021 07/12/2021 Signed by the prison representative 11/01/2022 -