CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 2 juin 2022

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4598CDF { width:70.9pt; display:inline-block } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .sAE4916B8 { width:96.07pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7FDD75C9 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; letter-spacing:-0.2pt; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .s4600776 { height:53.3pt } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .sB343B0AA { font-family:Arial; font-size:6.67pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 22453/19 Anna KHVOROVA against Azerbaijan (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 2 June 2022 as a Committee composed of:   Stéphanie Mourou-Vikström, President,   Ivana Jelić,   Kateřina Šimáčková, judges, and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 12   April 2019, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the case, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The applicant’s details are set out in the appended table. The applicant was represented by Ms N. Sadikhova, a lawyer based in Azerbaijan. The applicant’s complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article   1 of Protocol No.   1 concerning the non-enforcement of domestic decisions were communicated to the Azerbaijani Government (“the   Government”). The applicant died on 7 September 2021. On 3 February 2022 Ms Olga Vladimirova Iachmeneva , the applicant’s daughter, expressed her wish to continue the proceedings before the Court in the applicant’s stead. The Court notes that in various cases in which an applicant has died in the course of the Convention proceedings, it has taken into account the statements of the applicant’s heirs or of close family members expressing the wish to pursue the proceedings before the Court (see, among other authorities, Jėčius v.   Lithuania , no. 34578/97, § 41, ECHR 2000 ‑ IX; Pisarkiewicz v. Poland , no.   18967/02, §§ 30-33, 22 January 2008; and Ergezen v. Turkey , no.   73359/10, §§ 27-30, 8 April 2014). The Court has accepted that the next ‑ of-kin or heir may in principle pursue the application, provided that he or she has sufficient interest in the case (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v.   Romania [GC], no.   47848/08, § 97, ECHR   2014, and Ksenz and Others v. Russia , nos.   45044/06 and 5 others, §   86, 12   December 2017). In view of the above and having regard to the circumstances of the case, the Court holds that Ms Olga Vladimirova Iachmeneva has standing to continue the present proceedings in her late mother’s stead. The Court received the friendly-settlement declarations, signed by the parties, under which the applicant’s heir agreed to waive any further claims against Azerbaijan in respect of the facts giving rise to this application, and the Government undertook to pay her the amounts detailed in the appended table. These amounts will be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The Government also undertook to ensure the enforcement of the domestic decisions under consideration in the case within the same three-month period, and to pay any costs of the domestic enforcement proceedings. The payment and the enforcement of the domestic decisions in the case will constitute the final resolution of the case. THE LAW The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the application. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides   that the applicant’s daughter and heir can pursue the application; Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases in accordance with Article   39 of the Convention. Done in English and notified in writing on 23 June 2022.     Viktoriya Maradudina   Stéphanie Mourou-Vikström   Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX Application raising complaints under Article   6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (non-enforcement of domestic decisions) Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Years of birth and death Heir’s name Year of birth Representative’s name and location Relevant domestic decision Date of receipt of Government’s declaration Date of receipt of the declaration of the applicant’s heir Amount awarded for non ‑ pecuniary damage   (in euros) [1] Amount awarded for costs and expenses (in euros) [2] 22453/19 12/04/2019 Anna Nikolayevna KHVOROVA Born in 1928 Deceased in 2021 Olga Vladimirova IACHMENEVA 1959 Nigar SADIKHOVA Baku Supreme Court 02/07/2010 04/05/2022 10/04/2022 3,600 250             [1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicant. [2] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicant.