CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 25 août 2022

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4598CDF { width:70.9pt; display:inline-block } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .s376CDD9C { width:117.08pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s7C2B6CC2 { height:57pt } 24/1   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 27264/16 Sebastian SIMENY against Romania and 9 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 25   August 2022 as a Committee composed of:   Armen Harutyunyan , President,   Jolien Schukking ,   Ana Maria Guerra Martins , judges, and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of the applicants is set out in the appendix. The applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Romanian Government, who submitted observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicants, who were invited to submit their own observations. No reply was received by the Court. By letters sent by registered post, the applicants were notified that the time allowed for the submission of their observations had expired (see the appended table for the relevant dates). The applicants’ attention was further drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. No reply to these letters has been received by the Court (see details in the appended table) and there are no previous letters from the applicants informing the Court about the change of address. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. In the light of the foregoing, the Court concludes that the applicants may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue the applications (Article 37 § 1   (a) of the Convention). Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in   fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto which require the continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 15 September 2022.     Viktoriya Maradudina   Armen Harutyunyan   Acting Deputy Registrar   President   APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article   3 of the Convention (inadequate conditions of detention) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Representative’s name and location Date of the applicant’s last letter to the Court Date of the Court’s registered letter Date of receipt of the registered letter New time-limit for submission of observations by the applicant Date of the applicant’s release from prison     27264/16 02/06/2016 Sebastian SIMENY 1978     19/11/2020 23/11/2011 13/12/2021 Signed for receipt by the applicant 05/01/2022 In detention in Codlea Prison according to the Government’s observations of 06/11/2020     5801/17 11/01/2017 Emil-Cristian OTEA 1987 Dumitra Veronica Muşat Bucharest 04/05/2017 01/04/2022 Letter returned to sender on 24/05/2022 as “unclaimed” 13/05/2022 12/07/2016     6698/17 27/03/2017 Marin LUNEAN 1975     27/03/2017 01/04/2022 13/04/2022 Illegible signature 13/05/2022 22/11/2016     24430/17 14/04/2017 Mihail BĂNICĂ 1980 Doru Ristea Bucharest 26/06/2017 19/11/2021 Letter returned to sender on 15/03/2022 as “unclaimed” 05/01/2022 In detention in Bucharest-Rahova Prison according to the Government’s observations of 04/03/2021     25957/17 02/05/2017 Liviu-Emil LINGURAR 1987   16/06/2017   19/11/2021 03/12/2021 Signed for receipt by the applicant 05/01/2022 In detention in Satu Mare Prison according to the Government’s observations of 04/03/2021     29803/17 09/05/2017 Radu-Constantin PASCAL 1988     06/07/2017 19/11/2021 Letter returned to sender on 04/02/2022 as “unclaimed” 05/01/2022 21/11/2016     36215/18 04/09/2018 Ioan DARIE 1973     07/02/2019 19/11/2021 Letter returned to sender on 07/03/2022 as “unclaimed” 05/01/2022 12/10/2020     43267/19 29/08/2019 Gheorghe HUSAR 1955     05/11/2019 19/11/2021 Letter returned to sender from Dej Prison Hospital on 02/03/2022 as “moved to an unknown address” 05/01/2022 In detention in Dej Prison Hospital according to the Government’s observations of 20/10/2020     764/20 17/02/2020 Gabriel PETRIȘOR 1992     21/04/2020 23/11/2021 13/12/2021 Illegible signature   05/01/2022 19/01/2021   7840/20 11/03/2020 Marcel LUPSA 1964     26/06/2020 12/08/2021 24/08/2021 Illegible signature   23/09/2021 In detention in Arad Prison according to the Government’s observations of 15/01/2021