CEDHCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG25
CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 25 août 2022
- ECLI
- ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0825DEC003120708
- Date
- 25 août 2022
- Publication
- 25 août 2022
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleStruck out of the list
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4598CDF { width:70.9pt; display:inline-block } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .s4EC3C151 { width:116.76pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s35DD8131 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:30pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7FDD75C9 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; letter-spacing:-0.2pt; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s1DE04BC { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:8pt } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .sB343B0AA { font-family:Arial; font-size:6.67pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 31207/08 Maria Angela DEL BIANCO against Italy and 5 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 25   August 2022 as a Committee composed of: Krzysztof Wojtyczek , President, Erik Wennerström , Lorraine Schembri Orland , judges, and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants is set out in the appended table. The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 of the Convention concerning the non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic decisions were communicated to the Italian Government (“the Government”). In some applications complaints based on the same set of facts were also communicated to the Government (see appended table below). The Court received the friendly-settlement declarations, signed by the parties, under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Italy in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table. These amounts will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The Government also undertook to ensure the enforcement of the domestic decisions under consideration in the cases concerned (see appended table) within the same three-month period, where the final judgments have remained unenforced. The payment and, where relevant, the enforcement of the domestic decisions in the cases concerned will constitute the final resolution of the cases. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article   39 of the Convention. Done in English and notified in writing on 15 September 2022.     Viktoriya Maradudina   Krzysztof Wojtyczek   Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article   6 § 1 of the Convention (non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic decisions) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth/ registration Representative’s name and location Other complaints under well ‑ established case ‑ law Relevant domestic decisions Date of receipt of Government’s declaration Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration Amount awarded for non-pecuniary damage per applicant (in euros) [1] Amount awarded for costs and expenses per application (in euros) [2]     31207/08 16/06/2008 Maria Angela DEL BIANCO 1941 Gullotta Fabio Rome Prot. 1 Art. 1 - lack of or delayed payment of a debt by State authorities Rome Court of Appeal no. 2792/06, 12/06/2006 20/04/2022 05/01/2022 2,400 250     24190/09 21/04/2009 Monica CIOPPA 1965 Maria Vittoria DI CURZIO 1941 Leo Pietro Benevento Prot. 1 Art. 1 - lack of or delayed payment of a debt by State authorities Regional Administrative Court no. 6380/05, 10/03/2005 20/04/2022 16/06/2022 2,400 250     8195/11 10/01/2011 Monica CIOPPA 1965 Maria Vittoria DI CURZIO 1941 Leo Pietro Benevento   Naples Court of Appeal no. 962/10, 19/03/2010 20/04/2022 20/02/2022 4,000 250     34517/12 22/05/2012 Vita SCIRÈ 1936 Grazia Maria GRIGNANO 1965 Maria Antonia GRIGNANO 1964 Piacentino Massimo Trapani Prot. 1 Art. 1 - lack of or delayed payment of a debt by State authorities - Applicants deprived of their property without compensation Palermo Court of Appeal R.G. no. 1928/04, 14/10/2009 20/04/2022 20/01/2022 9,600 250     13858/15 16/03/2015 AVENTINO FRUTTA A.R.L. 1964 Buffolo Andrea Rome Art. 6 (1) – non ‑ enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic decisions - Impossibility to obtain through enforcement proceedings the payment of debts incurred by the Municipality of Rome (De Luca v. Italy, no.   43870/04, 24   September 2013, §§   65-74). Rome Court of Appeal R.G. 6173/06, 06/05/2014 20/04/2022 05/01/2022 9,600 250     58692/16 30/09/2016 Maria Bruna SIMONCELLI 1946 Lizza Egidio Rome   Rome Court of Appeal no. 1422/15, 03/03/2015 20/04/2022 20/12/2021 2,400 250   [1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants. [2] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
- Formation
- 25
- Date
- 25 août 2022
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0825DEC003120708
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral