CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 8 septembre 2022

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sA1D3DA2E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4598CDF { width:70.9pt; display:inline-block } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .s376CDD9C { width:117.08pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 27954/15 Cosimo SCAGLIONE against Romania and 17 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 8   September 2022 as a Committee composed of:   Armen Harutyunyan , President,   Jolien Schukking ,   Ana Maria Guerra Martins , judges, and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar , Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of the applicants is set out in the appendix. The applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Romanian Government, who submitted observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicants, who were invited to submit their own observations. No reply was received by the Court. By letters sent by registered post, the applicants were notified that the time allowed for the submission of their observations had expired (see the appended table for the relevant dates). The applicants’ attention was further drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. No reply to these letters has been received by the Court (see details in the appended table) and there are no previous letters from the applicants informing the Court about the change of address. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. In the light of the foregoing, the Court concludes that the applicants may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue the applications (Article 37 §   1 (a) of the Convention). Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto which require the continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 29 September 2022.     Viktoriya Maradudina   Armen Harutyunyan   Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article   3 of the Convention (inadequate conditions of detention) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Representative’s name and location Date of the applicant’s last letter to the Court Date of the Court’s registered letter Date of receipt of the registered letter New time-limit for submission of observations by the applicant Date of the applicant’s release from prison     27954/15 02/02/2016 Cosimo SCAGLIONE 1971     20/07/2020 25/03/2022 Letter returned to the sender on 18/04/2022 according to information on the Romanian Post website 06/05/2022 07/06/2016     43161/15 31/08/2016 Daniel-Didi GHEORGHE 1970 Ionuţ Boroş Bârlad 02/09/2020 25/03/2022 Signed by the applicant on 04/04/2022 06/05/2022 01/03/2016     61757/15 05/12/2015 Marin BADEA 1942     02/09/2020 25/03/2022 Signed by the applicant on 04/04/2022 06/05/2022 12/03/2016     14265/16 26/05/2016 Nani MIHAI 1983     23/07/2020 25/03/2022 Signed by the applicant on 04/04/2022 06/05/2022 09/05/2017     15697/16 11/05/2016 Iulian GREBENAR 1979     17/07/2020 22/05/2022 The applicant refuses receipt of the Court’s letter 08/04/2022 03/05/2022 23/10/2018     16979/16 01/06/2016 Bogdan-Adrian RĂDULESCU 1967     01/09/2020 22/03/2022 Letter returned to the sender on 12/04/2022 according to information on the Romanian Post website 03/05/2022 09/11/2016     21290/16 11/05/2016 Georgel LUPOAE 1974     11/08/2021 25/03/2022 Signed by the applicant on 04/04/2022 06/05/2022 22/01/2020     25573/16 29/08/2016 Emil ISTRĂTUCĂ 1972     15/10/2020 25/03/2022 Signed by the applicant on 05/04/2022 06/05/2022 06/02/2018     38941/16 12/10/2016 Francisc-Teodor FODOR 1969     27/03/2017 16/02/2022 Illegible signature on 24/02/2022 30/03/2022 21/02/2017   39152/16 01/11/2016 Marius ŢINICĂ 1984     11/02/2022 26/01/2022 Letter returned to the sender on 17/02/2022 according to information on the Romanian Post website 09/03/2022 14/03/2017   39298/16 28/07/2016 Victor ȘTEFAN 1982     11/09/2017 16/02/2022 Letter returned to the sender on 28/02/2022 as the applicant had moved out 30/03/2022 17/08/2017   39723/16 23/09/2016 Pascu ILIE 1993     04/11/2016 17/11/2021 Letter returned to the sender on 10/12/2021 as unclaimed by the applicant 04/01/2022 02/08/2017   42025/16 18/10/2016 Ioan-Alexandru GLĂJAR 1987     09/01/2018 28/02/2022 Illegible signature on 10/03/2022 14/03/2022 01/06/2016   2980/17 12/06/2017 Ionel-Iacob NICOLA 1967     09/03/2018 16/02/2022 Delivered to the applicant on 04/03/2022 according to Romanian Post website 30/03/2022 26/012017   31711/17 25/05/2017 Gheorghe STANCU 1974     24/03/2020 25/03/2022 Attempted delivery to the applicant on 05/04/2022, returned to the sender on 14/04/2022 06/05/2022 27/08/2018   48900/19 09/10/2019 Corneliu NEZIRU 1961     01/09/2020 16/02/2022 Signed by the prison representative on 25/02/2022 30/03/2022     7099/20 05/03/2020 Costică MOŢOI 1972     15/10/2020 05/01/2022 Signed by the applicant on 10/01/2022 16/02/2022     8796/20 09/03/2020 Mihăiţă ŞERBAN 1977     16/03/2020 05/01/2022 Letter returned to the sender on 25/01/2022 as unclaimed by the applicant 16/02/2022