CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 22 septembre 2022

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4598CDF { width:70.9pt; display:inline-block } .s8E0918A8 { width:37.55pt; display:inline-block } .sF64F4F6C { width:139.77pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7FDD75C9 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; letter-spacing:-0.2pt; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sADADF4A7 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .sB343B0AA { font-family:Arial; font-size:6.67pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 10978/21 Györgyné KOBZA and Others against Hungary (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 22   September 2022 as a Committee composed of:   Krzysztof Wojtyczek , President,   Erik Wennerström ,   Lorraine Schembri Orland , judges, and Attila Teplán, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 9   February 2021, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the case, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants is set out in the appended table. The applicants were represented by Ms E. Hangyál , a lawyer practising in Budapest. The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of civil proceedings were communicated to the Hungarian Government (“the Government”). The Court received the friendly-settlement declaration, signed by the parties, under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Hungary in respect of the facts giving rise to this application, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amount detailed in the appended table. This amount will be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay this amount within the above ‑ mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on it, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the case. THE LAW The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the application. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases in accordance with Article   39 of the Convention. Done in English and notified in writing on 13 October 2022.     Attila Teplán   Krzysztof Wojtyczek   Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX Application raising complaints under Article   6 § 1 of the Convention (excessive length of civil proceedings) Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Representative’s name and location Date of receipt of Government’s declaration Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration Amount awarded for pecuniary and non ‑ pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant/household (in euros) [1] 10978/21 09/02/2021 (56 applicants) Household Györgyné KOBZA 1935 György KOBZA 1960   Household László PÁSZTOR 1987 Ágnes PAULOVICS 1984   Household Lajos KALMÁR 1983 Zsolt KALMÁR 1978   Household Mónika Gabriella HORGÁSZ 1973 László HORGÁSZ 1981     Erika ANTALNÉ VARGA 1977   Attila István BEKÓ 1971   József István BEKÓ 1936   Istvánné BERTÓK 1941   Mónika Andrea CSELŐTEI 1970   Julianna CSIZMADIA 1954   Györgyné DUDÁS 1954   István FÁBIÁN 1948   Károlyné GAST 1956   Attila JUHÁSZ 1976   Ferenc JUHÁSZ 1951   Sándorné KALVACH 1949   Zsuzsanna Ilona KATONA 1959   Sándorné KISS 1947   Györgyné KOBZA 1960   Ferenc KURUCZ 1950   József KURUCZ 1953   Tibor Lászlóné LIGETI 1953   Ferenc Imréné MÁRTON 1955   József MOLNÁR 1962   József Györgyné MOLNÁR 1933   Krisztina Marianna MOLNÁR 1979 Zoltán MOLNÁR 1972   Valéria Erzsébet MURAI 1947   Ferenc NASZÁDI 1979   József NASZÁDI 1937   Sára Teréz NASZÁDI 1980   István PÁSZTOR 1972   Árpádné RICHTER 1957   Mária Terézia RUDOLFNÉ KATONA 1956   Lászlóné SAS 1950   György SIKTER 1950   László SIKTER 1948 Jánosné STEGMAJER 1973   György TÓTH 1952   Mária Terézia TÓTH 1954   Ferenc VARGA 1976   Ferencné VARGA 1953   Jánosné VARGA 1954   Krisztina VARGA 1977   Sándorné VARGA 1946   Zoltán VARGA 1972   Gyula Lászlóné VASKÓ 1955   István VEREBES 1966   Krisztina WEISZ 1977   László WEISZ 1968   Erzsébet ZANA 1960   Imre ZVONORICS 1955   Hangyál Edit Budapest 28/03/2022 05/07/2022 1,600   [1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.