CEDHCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG27
CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 6 octobre 2022
- ECLI
- ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1006DEC002799619
- Date
- 6 octobre 2022
- Publication
- 6 octobre 2022
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleStruck out of the list
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s434D37A9 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4598CDF { width:70.9pt; display:inline-block } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .s1720DE1F { width:132.75pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s7BF29C1E { width:139.76pt; display:inline-block }   THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 27996/19 Nermin HABIBI against Albania The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 6   October   2022 as a Committee composed of: Andreas Zünd , President, Darian Pavli , Frédéric Krenc , judges, and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 17   May 2019, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The applicant, Ms Nermin Habibi, was born in 1964. She was represented by Mr Xh. Sheta and Mr A. Peka, lawyers practising in Tirana. Under Article 6 § 1 and Article 13 of the Convention, as well as under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention, the applicant complained that the authorities had failed to pay her the full amount of compensation for the expropriation of a plot of land and that she had no effective remedy in respect of her complaint. The application was communicated to the Albanian Government who submitted observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded via the Court’s Electronic Communications Service (eComms) to the applicant, who was invited to submit her own observations. No reply was received by the Court. By a letter of 1 June 2022 sent through eComms, the applicant’s attention was drawn to the fact that failure to submit a reply might result in the striking ‑ out of the application in accordance with Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention. The applicant’s representatives downloaded the letter on the same date. However, no reply followed. THE LAW In the light of the foregoing, the Court concludes that the applicant may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue her application (Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention). Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto which require the continued examination of the application. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 27 October 2022.     Viktoriya Maradudina   Andreas Zünd   Acting Deputy Registrar   Presiden tCitations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
- Formation
- 27
- Date
- 6 octobre 2022
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1006DEC002799619
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral