CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 20 octobre 2022

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .sEB98FB19 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4598CDF { width:70.9pt; display:inline-block } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .sE13162EA { width:134.76pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7FDD75C9 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; letter-spacing:-0.2pt; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sE3DA80B3 { font-family:Arial; font-size:6pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sADADF4A7 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline } .sB9EE4DFD { height:41pt } .sE4B40776 { height:50.8pt } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .sB343B0AA { font-family:Arial; font-size:6.67pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   SECOND SECTION DECISION Application no. 58108/21 Dragan LAZIĆ against Serbia and 19 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 20   October 2022 as a Committee composed of: Jovan Ilievski , President , Gilberto Felici, Diana Sârcu , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants is set out in the appended table. The applicants were represented by Mr S. Aleksić, a lawyer practising in Niš. One of the applicants, Mr Lazić (application no. 58108/21), died in 2022. The Government accepted his wife, Mrs Marina Dumić Lazić, as his legal heir. The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article   1 of Protocol No.   1 concerning the non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic decisions given against socially/State-owned companies were communicated to the Serbian Government (“the Government”). The Court received the friendly-settlement declarations, signed by the parties, under which the applicants and the legal heir of Mr Lazić agreed to waive any further claims against Serbia in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table. These amounts will be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment and will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The Government also undertake to ensure the enforcement of the domestic decisions under consideration in the cases concerned (see appended table) within the same three-month period, and to pay any costs of the domestic enforcement proceedings. The payment and the enforcement of the domestic decisions in the cases concerned will constitute the final resolution of the cases. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Court takes note of the death of Mr Lazić and of the wish of his wife to pursue the proceedings. The Court reiterates that where an applicant dies during the examination of a case his or her heirs may in principle pursue the application on his or her behalf (see Ječius v.   Lithuania , no.   34578/97, §   41, ECHR 2000-IX; Shiryayeva v. Russia , no.   21417/04, §§   8-9, 13 July 2006; and Horváthová v. Slovakia , no. 74456/01, § 26, 17   May 2005). Nothing suggests that the rights the applicant sought to protect through the Convention mechanism were eminently personal and non-transferable (see   Malhous v.   the Czech Republic [GC], no.   33071/96, 12   July 2001). The Government did not contend that Mrs   Marina Dumić Lazić had standing to pursue the case. Therefore, the Court considers that Mr Lazić’s wife has a legitimate interest in pursuing the application. The Court further takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides that Mrs Dumić Lazić has standing to continue the proceedings in her late husband’s stead (application no. 58108/21); Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article   39 of the Convention. Done in English and notified in writing on 10 November 2022.     Viktoriya Maradudina   Jovan Ilievski   Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article   6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic decisions given against socially/State-owned companies) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Date of receipt of Government’s declaration Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration Amount awarded for non-pecuniary damage per applicant/household (in euros) [1] [2] Amount awarded for costs and expenses per application (in euros) [3]     58108/21 23/11/2021 Dragan LAZIĆ 1960 Deceased in 2022   Pursued by heir: Marina Dumić Lazić 1967 29/08/2022 20/09/2022 1,000 250     58110/21 23/11/2021 (3 applicants) Household Marijana RISTIĆ 1979 Jelena TRAJKOVIĆ 1976 Gordana RISTIĆ 1949 29/08/2022 01/08/2022 1,000 250     61116/21 23/11/2021 Novica NIKOLIĆ 1963 29/08/2022 01/08/2022 1,000 250     13930/22 09/03/2022 Živadin VUČKOVIĆ 1962 29/08/2022 01/08/2022 1,000 250     13933/22 09/03/2022 Svetlana JAĆIMOVIĆ 1964 29/08/2022 01/08/2022 1,000 250     13947/22 09/03/2022 Dragana PIRIĆ 1987 29/08/2022 01/08/2022 1,000 250     13964/22 09/03/2022 Slobodan KOVAČEVIĆ 1952 29/08/2022 01/08/2022 1,000 250     13970/22 09/03/2022 Jovan JOVANOVIĆ 1948 29/08/2022 01/08/2022 1,000 250     16055/22 22/03/2022 Vladan MARINKOVIĆ 1969 29/08/2022 01/08/2022 1,000 250   16056/22 22/03/2022 Dejan JEVTIĆ 1967 29/08/2022 01/08/2022 1,000 250   16058/22 22/03/2022 Vesna RAVIĆ 1965 29/08/2022 01/08/2022 1,000 250   16064/22 22/03/2022 Heneri DELIĆ 1974 29/08/2022 01/08/2022 1,000 250   16065/22 22/03/2022 Tamara TODOROVIĆ 1977 29/08/2022 01/08/2022 1,000 250   16068/22 22/03/2022 Gordana KRSTIĆ 1969 29/08/2022 01/08/2022 1,000 250   16069/22 22/03/2022 Zoran RISTIĆ 1959 29/08/2022 01/08/2022 1,000 250   16072/22 22/03/2022 Velibor MOJSA 1958 29/08/2022 01/08/2022 1,000 250   16075/22 22/03/2022 Goran JOVIĆ 1974 29/08/2022 01/08/2022 1,000 250   16080/22 22/03/2022 Boban STOJANOVIĆ 1987 29/08/2022 01/08/2022 1,000 250   18403/22 01/04/2022 Goroljub STEVIĆ 1958 29/08/2022 01/08/2022 1,000 250   18429/22 01/04/2022 Marina TACKOVIĆ 1977 29/08/2022 01/08/2022 1,000 250   [1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants. [2] Less any amounts which may have already been paid in that regard at the domestic level. [3] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.