CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 24 novembre 2022

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4598CDF { width:70.9pt; display:inline-block } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .s459D9084 { width:131.09pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s75A32C27 { border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2E932ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:11pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s906CA806 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:11pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center }   SECOND SECTION DECISION Application no. 7494/17 Rıfat SARI against Türkiye and 30 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 24   November 2022 as a Committee composed of:   Frédéric Krenc , President ,   Diana Sârcu,   Davor Derenčinović , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of the applicants is set out in the appendix. The applicants’ various complaints under Article 5 of the Convention were communicated to the Turkish Government (“the Government”), who submitted observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicants, who were invited to submit their own observations. No reply was received to the Registry’s letters. By letters sent by registered post and dated 18 January 2022 for application no. 28408/19; 23 February 2022 for applications nos. 7494/17, 83206/17, 56472/18, 36500/19, 44755/19, 45901/19, 98/20, 3512/20, 3514/20, and 4188/20; 30 March 2022 for applications nos. 43741/17, 83999/17, 183/18, 10834/18, 24169/18, 7250/19, 17524/19, 21226/19, 21264/19, 24351/19, 24370/19, 24780/19, 25413/19, 30232/19, 30284/19, 30296/19, 35090/19, 36634/19 and 51124/19, and 31 May 2022 for application no.76424/17, the applicants were notified that the period allowed for submission of their observations had expired and that no extension of time had been requested. The applicants’ attention was drawn to Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. The letters in respect of applications nos. 7494/17, 83206/17, 24169/18, 56472/18, 21226/19, 21264/19, 28408/19, 36500/19, 44755/19, 45901/19, 98/20, 3512/20, 3514/20 and 76424/17 were delivered between 7   February and 8 June 2022. However, no response has been received. The letters in respect of applications nos. 43741/17, 83999/17, 183/18, 10834/18, 7250/19, 17524/19, 24351/19, 24370/19, 24780/19, 25413/19, 30232/19, 30284/19, 30296/19, 35090/19, 36634/19, 51124/19 and 4188/20 could not be delivered to the applicants although none of them had informed the Court of a change in their address. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. In the light of the foregoing, and in the absence of any special circumstances regarding respect for the rights guaranteed by the Convention and the Protocols thereto, the Court, in accordance with Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention, considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the applications. Accordingly, the applications should be struck out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications ; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 15 December 2022.     Viktoriya Maradudina   Frédéric Krenc   Acting Deputy Registrar   President   APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article 5 of the Convention No. Application no. Case name Lodged on Applicant Year of Birth Place of Residence Nationality Represented by 1. 7494/17 Sarı v. Türkiye 15/12/2016 Rıfat SARI 1973 Ankara Turkish Ahmet HARTAVİ 2. 43741/17 Aydın v. Türkiye 03/05/2017 Harun AYDIN 1979 Istanbul Turkish Hüseyin AYGÜN 3. 76424/17 Yıldırım v. Türkiye 26/09/2017 Mesut YILDIRIM 1977 Kırşehir Turkish Hilal YILDIZLI 4. 83206/17 Aydın v. Türkiye 29/11/2017 Şevki Metin AYDIN 1978 Mersin Turkish Hüseyin AYGÜN 5. 83999/17 Cengiz v. Türkiye 16/11/2017 Yavuz CENGIZ 1985 Ankara Turkish Hüseyin AYGÜN 6. 183/18 Demir v. Türkiye 06/12/2017 Recayi DEMIR 1980 Ankara Turkish Hüseyin AYGÜN 7. 10834/18 Sarıyer v. Türkiye 06/12/2017 İlhan SARIYER 1972 Ankara Turkish Hüseyin AYGÜN 8. 24169/18 Göker v. Türkiye 08/05/2018 Volkan Şefik GÖKER 1986 Istanbul Turkish Mahmut YAŞAR 9. 56472/18 Köse v. Türkiye 26/11/2018 Murat KÖSE 1980 Ankara Turkish Hüseyin AYGÜN 10. 7250/19 Şahin v. Türkiye 21/01/2019 Mustafa ŞAHİN 1969 Ankara Turkish Hüseyin AYGÜN 11. 17524/19 Şaşmaz v. Türkiye 22/03/2019 Canbulut ŞAŞMAZ 1978 Ankara Turkish Hüseyin AYGÜN 12. 21226/19 Öz v. Türkiye 26/03/2019 Ömer ÖZ 1983 Hatay Turkish Orhan DOĞRU 13. 21264/19 Bayburtlu v. Türkiye 08/04/2019 Arif BAYBURTLU 1982 Amasya Turkish Adnan AYDIN 14. 24351/19 İnci v. Türkiye 16/04/2019 Tamer İNCİ 1977 Turkish Hüseyin AYGÜN 15. 24370/19 Samsa v. Türkiye 16/04/2019 Harun SAMSA 1980 Turkish Hüseyin AYGÜN 16. 24780/19 Gökçeli v. Türkiye 24/04/2019 Abdurrahman GÖKÇELİ 1977 Adana Turkish Ahmet Gani KÜÇÜK 17. 25413/19 Çağatay v. Türkiye 03/05/2019 Mustafa ÇAĞATAY 1969 Turkish Hüseyin AYGÜN 18. 28408/19 Doğan v. Türkiye 09/05/2019 Irfan DOĞAN 1967 Ankara Turkish Hüseyin AYGÜN 19. 30232/19 Kahraman v. Türkiye 14/05/2019 Yasin KAHRAMAN 1988 Samsun Turkish Bayram SAYIN 20. 30284/19 Gür v. Türkiye 16/05/2019 Arif Ramazan GÜR 1970 Ankara Turkish Hüseyin AYGÜN 21. 30296/19 Kılıç v. Türkiye 16/05/2019 Yakup KILIÇ 1987 Turkish Hüseyin AYGÜN 22. 35090/19 Karaağaç v. Türkiye 28/06/2019 Naim KARAAĞAÇ 1970 Ankara Turkish Hüseyin AYGÜN 23. 36500/19 Karakaş v. Türkiye 18/06/2019 Akın KARAKAŞ 1969 Kırıkkale Turkish   24. 36634/19 Kamış v. Türkiye 19/06/2019 Agah Oktay KAMIŞ 1979 Tekirdağ Turkish Hüseyin AYGÜN 25. 44755/19 Tek v. Türkiye 08/08/2019 Ömer Faruk TEK 1982 Osmaniye Turkish   26. 45901/19 Bora v. Türkiye 16/08/2019 Ayhan BORA 1970 Mersin Turkish Nidal HÜZMELİ HADİMOĞLU 27. 51124/19 Tanrıkulu v. Türkiye 06/09/2019 Cengiz TANRIKULU 1968 Visp Turkish Hüseyin AYGÜN 28. 98/20 Çelik v. Türkiye 09/12/2019 Fatma Nur ÇELİK 1986 Çorum Turkish Adem KAPLAN 29. 3512/20 Turşak v. Türkiye 10/01/2020 Ramazan TURŞAK 1978 Ankara Turkish Hüseyin AYGÜN 30. 3514/20 Tosun v. Türkiye 10/01/2020 Ayşe TOSUN 1989 Istanbul Turkish Hüseyin AYGÜN 31. 4188/20 Çetin v. Türkiye 26/12/2019 Gültekin ÇETİN 1985 Istanbul Turkish