CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 8 décembre 2022

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4598CDF { width:70.9pt; display:inline-block } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s798A1C99 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:center } .s80004C07 { width:103.94%; border-collapse:collapse } .sBC330D85 { width:11.26%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s1C202DF7 { width:20.3%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s5B1078AF { width:27.84%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sFAB1EC97 { width:20.44%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s63C5EE82 { width:20.16%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s5CDDED00 { width:11.26%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s87F5DEF9 { width:20.3%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s980143DB { width:27.84%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s929A47D6 { width:20.44%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sEF87890 { width:20.16%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top }   THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 45307/20 K.D. and R.D. against Greece (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 8   December 2022 as a Committee composed of:   Darian Pavli , President ,   Ioannis Ktistakis,   Andreas Zünd , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 14   October 2020, Having regard to the interim measure indicated to the respondent Government under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court, Having regard to the decision to grant the applicants   anonymity, in accordance with Rule 47 § 4 of the Rules of the Court, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of the applicants is set out in the appendix. The applicants, mother and daughter, were represented by Ms I.   Metton, a lawyer practising in Paris. On 15 October 2020 the Court acceded to the first applicant’s request to apply Rule 39 of the Rules of Court and indicated that the Government should guarantee to the first applicant living conditions compatible with her state of health and should provide her with adequate healthcare compatible with her state of health. The applicants’ complaints under Articles 3 and/or 8 concerning their living conditions, as well as under Article 13 of the Convention regarding the existence of an effective remedy in order to complain of their living conditions, were communicated to the Greek Government (“the Government”). On 15   August 2022 the applicants’ representative informed the Registry that the applicants wanted to withdraw their application to the Court. THE LAW In the light of the foregoing, the Court concludes that the applicants may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue the application (Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention). Furthermore, in accordance with Article   37   §   1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto which require the continued examination of the application. Accordingly, the case should be struck out of the list. It is therefore also appropriate to discontinue the application of Rule 39 of the Rules of Court. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 12 January 2023.     Viktoriya Maradudina   Darian Pavli   Acting Deputy Registrar   President   APPENDIX List of applicants   No. Applicant’s Name Year of birth Nationality Place of residence 1. K. D. 1995 Syrian Samos 2. R. D. 2017 Syrian Samos