CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 23 mars 2023

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s46DB5BA6 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sC986E16F { font-family:Arial; color:#ffffff } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .s459D9084 { width:131.09pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold }   SECOND SECTION DECISION Application no. 84/18 Ramazan ÖZBEK against Türkiye and 20 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 23   March 2023 as a Committee composed of:   Frédéric Krenc , President ,   Diana Sârcu,   Davor Derenčinović , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of the applicants and their representatives is set out in the appendix. The applicants’ various complaints under Article 5 of the Convention were communicated to the Turkish Government (“the Government”), who submitted observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicants, who were invited to submit their own observations. No reply was received to the Registry’s letter. By letters dated 6 October 2022, sent by registered post, the applicants were notified that the period allowed for submission of their observations   had expired on 24 August 2022 and that no extension of time had been requested. The applicants’ attention was drawn to Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. The registered letters either returned to the Court as unclaimed or were received by the applicants and to which they did not respond. There are also no previous letters from the applicants informing the Court about the change of address. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. In the light of the foregoing, and in the absence of any special circumstances regarding respect for the rights guaranteed by the Convention and the Protocols thereto, the Court, in accordance with Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention, considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the applications. Accordingly, the cases should be struck out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 13 April 2023.     Viktoriya Maradudina   Frédéric Krenc   Acting Deputy Registrar   President   APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article 5 of the Convention   No. Application no. Case name Lodged on Applicant Year of Birth Place of Residence Nationality Represented by 1. 84/18 Özbek v. Türkiye 06/12/2017 Ramazan ÖZBEK 1982 Elazig Turkish Hüseyin AYGÜN 2. 86/18 Tan v. Türkiye 06/12/2017 Naim TAN 1971 Elazig Turkish Hüseyin AYGÜN 3. 133/18 Çiftçi v. Türkiye 06/12/2017 İrfan ÇİFTÇİ 1979 Elazig Turkish Hüseyin AYGÜN 4. 144/18 Eker v. Türkiye 06/12/2017 Hüseyin EKER 1983 Elazig Turkish Hüseyin AYGÜN 5. 6480/18 Arslan v. Türkiye 03/01/2018 Ufuk ARSLAN 1991 Konya Turkish İsmail ZEYBEK 6. 6691/18 Uzundal v. Türkiye 25/01/2018 Mehmet UZUNDAL 1992 Kirikkale Turkish Havvana UZUNDAL 7. 7741/18 Güneş v. Türkiye 15/01/2018 Mehmet GÜNEŞ 1991 Sanliurfa Turkish   8. 7747/18 Gökçe v. Türkiye 17/01/2018 Üsame GÖKÇE 1984 Konya Turkish Beytül GÖKÇE 9. 10891/18 Bulmuş v. Türkiye 06/02/2018 Cihan BULMUŞ 1984 Sivas Turkish   10. 14910/18 Güler v. Türkiye 13/03/2018 Ali GÜLER 1989 Burdur Turkish   11. 16895/18 Arslanbaba v. Türkiye 26/03/2018 Mustafa ARSLANBABA 1984 Kutahya Turkish Turgut ÖZEN 12. 16900/18 Kartal v. Türkiye 28/03/2018 Ferhat KARTAL 1991 Erzurum Turkish   13. 17569/18 Çengelci v. Türkiye 08/03/2018 Ali ÇENGELCİ 1970 Afyonkarahisar Turkish   14. 19290/18 Yılmaz v. Türkiye 13/04/2018 Seçkin YILMAZ 1976 Ankara Turkish Mikail Mustafa ŞAHIN 15. 20469/18 Koç v. Türkiye 17/04/2018 Ramazan KOÇ 1973 Afyonkarahisar Turkish Ahmet ALAYBEYOĞLU 16. 21908/18 Aksoy v. Türkiye 27/04/2018 Hasanbasri AKSOY 1969 Ankara Turkish   17. 41587/18 Esen v. Türkiye 08/08/2018 Sinan ESEN 1976 Sivas Turkish Ibrahim KAMBUR 18. 45718/18 Seçgin v. Türkiye 19/09/2018 Ahmet SEÇGİN 1982 Elazığ Turkish   19. 46372/18 Tuncer v. Türkiye 27/09/2018 Abdullah Murat TUNCER 1957 Ankara Turkish Namık ÖZTÜRK 20. 46421/18 Şakiroğlu v. Türkiye 12/09/2018 Sait ŞAKIROĞLU 1981 Kayseri Turkish Metin SÖNMEZ 21. 46901/18 Alimoğlu v. Türkiye 24/09/2018 Abdullah Ömer ALIMOĞLU 1991 Ankara Turkish