CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 6 avril 2023

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s46DB5BA6 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4598CDF { width:70.9pt; display:inline-block } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .s459D9084 { width:131.09pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .sB7A3531E { margin-left:23pt; padding-left:13pt; font-family:Arial; font-size:12pt } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sB97264EC { height:72.2pt }   SECOND SECTION DECISION Application no. 14838/17 Muhammet Fatih ÖZTÜRK against Türkiye and 37 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 6 April 2023 as a Committee composed of:   Frédéric Krenc , President ,   Diana Sârcu,   Davor Derenčinović , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of the applicants and their representatives is set out in the appendix. The applicants’ various complaints under Article 5 of the Convention were communicated to the Turkish Government (“the Government”), who submitted observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicants, who were invited to submit their own observations. No reply was received to the Registry’s letter. By letters, sent by registered post and dated 24 October 2022, the applicants were notified that the period allowed for submission of their observations   had expired on the various dates and that no extension of time had been requested. The applicants’ attention was drawn to Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. The registered letters either returned to the Court as unclaimed or were received by the applicants. No reply to the letters has been received by the Court and there are no previous letters from the applicants informing the Court about the change of address. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. In the light of the foregoing, and in the absence of any special circumstances regarding respect for the rights guaranteed by the Convention and the Protocols thereto, the Court, in accordance with Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention, considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the applications. Accordingly, the cases should be struck out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 11 May 2023.     Viktoriya Maradudina   Frédéric Krenc   Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article 5 of the Convention   No. Application no. Case name Lodged on Applicant Year of Birth Place of Residence Nationality Represented by   14838/17 Öztürk v. Türkiye 16/01/2017 Muhammet Fatih ÖZTÜRK 1990 İzmir Turkish Serdar ÖZCAN   18879/17 Yıldırım v. Türkiye 14/02/2017 İsmail YILDIRIM 1974 Kocaeli Turkish Abdulkadir AKBAŞ   34120/17 Şirin v. Türkiye 07/03/2017 Süleyman Hilmi ŞİRİN 1975 Düzce Turkish Meryem AYDIN ŞİRİN   40060/17 Tunç v. Türkiye 10/05/2017 Ahmet TUNÇ 1978 Gaziantep Turkish Recep ÇINAR   43691/17 Duruay v. Türkiye 18/05/2017 Durmuş DURUAY 1978 Kocaeli Turkish Ersayın IŞIK   48980/17 Aksu v. Türkiye 25/04/2017 Gokhan AKSU 1979 Ankara Turkish Ertuğrul ALKILIÇ   51933/17 Akkurt v. Türkiye 23/06/2017 Doğan AKKURT 1967 Kocaeli Turkish Fatma İrem AKKURT ATAŞ   58442/17 Doğru v. Türkiye 13/07/2017 Coşkun DOĞRU 1965 İZMİR Turkish Murat Hüdaverdi SÖNMEZ   60991/17 Aslan v. Türkiye 03/08/2017 Zafer ASLAN 1976 İzmir Turkish Ali BULUT   61696/17 Bayram v. Türkiye 08/06/2017 Mustafa BAYRAM 1982 Tokat Turkish Hasan YILMAZ   62119/17 Akbudak v. Türkiye 15/05/2017 Turgut AKBUDAK 1981 ANKARA Turkish Hayrettin AÇIKGÖZ   62229/17 Dumanoğlu v. Türkiye 21/04/2017 Kerim DUMANOĞLU 1980 Tokat Turkish     62850/17 Geniş v. Türkiye 06/02/2017 Mehmet Emin GENİŞ 1988 İzmir Turkish Hüseyin Yılmaz ŞAFAK   63210/17 Gül v. Türkiye 30/05/2017 Muammer GÜL 1970 Malatya Turkish Mahmut NURLAN   63979/17 Sevinç v. Türkiye 21/04/2017 Halil İbrahim SEVİNÇ 1975 Tokat Turkish     66600/17 Hocaoğlu v. Türkiye 17/05/2017 Özgür HOCAOĞLU 1976 Kocaeli Turkish Ersayın IŞIK   67652/17 Şafak v. Türkiye 03/08/2017 Muhammet ŞAFAK 1990 Ankara Turkish Ali Sinan NACAK   70498/17 Kara v. Türkiye 08/08/2017 Fatih KARA 1986 Erzincan Turkish     70530/17 Şimşek v. Türkiye 08/02/2017 Selçuk ŞİMŞEK 1983 Kırıkkale Turkish Mithat ATALAY   70792/17 Aslan v. Türkiye 07/09/2017 Hamdi ASLAN 1981 Tekirdağ Turkish     75884/17 Çetin v. Türkiye 11/10/2017 Fatih ÇETİN 1975 Ankara Turkish     79093/17 Kablan v. Türkiye 04/05/2017 Emre KABLAN 1989 Kahramanmaraş Turkish Yasemin Nur KOYUN   81536/17 Uzun v. Türkiye 02/11/2017 Mehmet UZUN 1974 Edirne Turkish Fatih KOÇ   81712/17 Yıldız v. Türkiye 20/09/2017 Şükrü YILDIZ 1959 Ankara Turkish Nebi DOĞAN   81845/17 Dalcan v. Türkiye 06/11/2017 Kerem DALCAN 1985 Elazığ Turkish Hüseyin AYGÜN   82736/17 Ak v. Türkiye 02/11/2017 Uğur AK 1981 Aksaray Turkish Mete Yıldırım ZENCİR   82856/17 Soyuğurlu v. Türkiye 07/11/2017 Hidayet SOYUĞURLU 1972 Elazığ Turkish Hüseyin AYGÜN   84075/17 Özdemir v. Türkiye 13/11/2017 Emrah ÖZDEMİR 1986 Elazığ Turkish Hüseyin AYGÜN   84078/17 Sarıgül v. Türkiye 13/11/2017 İbrahim SARIGÜL 1966 Elazığ Turkish Hüseyin AYGÜN   84121/17 Okumuş v. Türkiye 14/11/2017 Muammer OKUMUŞ 1982 Elazığ Turkish Hüseyin AYGÜN   84137/17 Bayram v. Türkiye 16/11/2017 Yalçın BAYRAM 1971 Ankara Turkish Hüseyin AYGÜN   26423/18 Dundar v. Türkiye 30/05/2018 Fatih DÜNDAR 1988 Ankara Turkish Hüseyin AYGÜN   26630/18 Kılıç v. Türkiye 01/06/2018 Ali KILIÇ 1986 Ankara Turkish     26927/18 Ildam v. Türkiye 29/05/2018 Kadir İLDAM 1992 Denizli Turkish     29604/18 Oral v. Türkiye 13/06/2018 Ramazan ORAL 1987 Cankırı Turkish     30537/18 Güneş v. Türkiye 13/06/2018 Erkan GÜNEŞ 1984 Yozgat Turkish Ümmügülsüm GÜNEŞ   39423/18 Çapkın v. Türkiye 09/08/2018 Hüdai ÇAPKIN 1989 Istanbul Turkish Elif DURUER CANİK   40078/18 Öztürk v. Türkiye 18/08/2018 Satılmış ÖZTÜRK 1980 Ankara Turkish Tanzer KURT