CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 6 avril 2023

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s46DB5BA6 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4598CDF { width:70.9pt; display:inline-block } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .s459D9084 { width:131.09pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold }   SECOND SECTION DECISION Application no. 33368/18 Cem DİNÇ against Türkiye and 18 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 6   April 2023 as a Committee composed of:   Frédéric Krenc , President ,   Diana Sârcu,   Davor Derenčinović , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of the applicants and their representatives is set out in the appendix. The applicants’ various complaints under Article 5 of the Convention were communicated to the Turkish Government (“the Government”), who submitted observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicants, who were invited to submit their own observations. No reply was received to the Registry’s letter. By letters, sent by registered post and dated 6 October 2022, the applicants were notified that the period allowed for submission of their observations   had expired on the various dates and that no extension of time had been requested. The applicants’ attention was drawn to Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. The registered letters either returned to the Court as unclaimed or were received by the applicants. No reply to the letters has been received by the Court and there are no previous letters from the applicants informing the Court about the change of address. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. In the light of the foregoing, and in the absence of any special circumstances regarding respect for the rights guaranteed by the Convention and the Protocols thereto, the Court, in accordance with Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention, considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the applications. Accordingly, the cases should be struck out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 11 May 2023.     Viktoriya Maradudina   Frédéric Krenc   Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article 5 of the Convention No. Application no. Case name Lodged on Applicant Year of Birth Place of Residence Nationality Represented by 1. 33368/18 Dinç v. Türkiye 03/07/2018 Cem DİNÇ 1972 Kırıkkale Turkish Neslin YAVUZ DİNÇ 2. 39113/18 Öztürk v. Türkiye 28/04/2018 Murat ÖZTÜRK 1975 Ordu Turkish Neziha YILMAZ 3. 40472/18 Abalı v. Türkiye 10/08/2018 Özkan ABALI 1992 Manisa Turkish Süleyman ŞAHİN 4. 44651/18 Atılgan v. Türkiye 06/09/2018 Ömer ATILGAN 1970 Çorum Turkish   5. 45087/18 Taşkın v. Türkiye 17/09/2018 Emre TAŞKIN 1984 Bursa Turkish Yasemin TAŞKIN 6. 45297/18 Ergin v. Türkiye 21/09/2018 Mustafa ERGİN 1988 Balıkesir Turkish Saliha ERGİN 7. 45334/18 Kaçar v. Türkiye 11/09/2018 Buhari KAÇAR 1972 Manisa Turkish   8. 47561/18 İçer v. Türkiye 06/07/2018 İbrahim İÇER 1973 Ankara Turkish   9. 47703/18 Kaplan v. Türkiye 25/09/2018 Ahmet KAPLAN 1972 Osmaniye Turkish   10. 48051/18 Yıldız v. Türkiye 25/09/2018 Adnan YILDIZ 1970 Kocaeli Turkish   11. 49298/18 Kocaer v. Türkiye 08/10/2018 Ahmet KOCAER 1966 Aksaray Turkish Ese KOCAER 12. 49405/18 Öztürk v. Türkiye 12/10/2018 Şenol ÖZTÜRK 1989 Bolu Turkish Nursel AKGÜN 13. 50055/18 Yılmaz v. Türkiye 06/10/2018 Yılmaz YILMAZ 1981 Zonguldak Turkish   14. 50258/18 İlhan v. Türkiye 26/09/2018 Eyüp İLHAN 1983 Konya Turkish Meral İLHAN 15. 50627/18 Sayın v. Türkiye 22/10/2018 Mücahit SAYIN 1976 Tekirdağ Turkish   16. 50884/18 Şahin Balcık v. Türkiye 19/10/2018 Özlem ŞAHİN BALCIK 1975 Samsun Turkish Süeda Esma ŞEN KARA 17. 51101/18 Yanmaz v. Türkiye 25/10/2018 Kazım YANMAZ 1987 SEE REP. ADDRESS Turkish Hüseyin AYGÜN 18. 53546/18 Suyabatmaz v. Türkiye 08/11/2018 Mustafa SUYABATMAZ 1977 Ankara Turkish Hüseyin AYGÜN 19. 53608/18 Kaya v. Türkiye 08/11/2018 Mehmet Oğuz KAYA 1963 Ankara Turkish Hüseyin AYGÜN