CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 6 avril 2023

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4598CDF { width:70.9pt; display:inline-block } .s8E0918A8 { width:37.55pt; display:inline-block } .s5AAEE4F1 { width:148.75pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7FDD75C9 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; letter-spacing:-0.2pt; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .sB343B0AA { font-family:Arial; font-size:6.67pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 34069/22 Dániel Márk CSAPÓ against Hungary and 10 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 6   April   2023 as a Committee composed of:   Alena Poláčková, President,   Gilberto Felici,   Raffaele Sabato, judges, and Attila Teplán, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants and their representatives is set out in the appended table. The applicants’ complaints under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of pre-trial detention were communicated to the Hungarian Government (“the Government”). In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under other provisions of the Convention. The Court received the friendly-settlement declarations, signed by the parties, under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Hungary in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table. These amounts will be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above ‑ mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article   39 of the Convention. Done in English and notified in writing on 11 May 2023.     Attila Teplán   Alena Poláčková   Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article   5   §   3 of the Convention (excessive length of pre-trial detention) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Representative’s name and location Other complaints under well-established case ‑ law   Date of receipt of Government’s declaration Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros) [1]     34069/22 05/07/2022 Dániel Márk CSAPÓ 1996 Kiss Dániel Bálint Budapest   21/02/2023 15/11/2022 4,200     36194/22 15/07/2022 György Béla BERÉNYI 1985 Kiss Dominika Szilvia Budapest   21/02/2023 02/11/2022 4,000     38167/22 01/08/2022 András SZABÓ 1980 Karsai Dániel András Budapest   15/02/2023 12/12/2022 4,000     39826/22 09/08/2022 András CETŐ 1982 Kiss Dániel Bálint Budapest   09/12/2022 16/01/2023 3,800     41037/22 17/08/2022 Szilvia Renáta PAPP 1992 Karsai Dániel András Budapest Art. 6 (1) - excessive length of criminal proceedings - The applicant is subject to criminal proceedings since 27/03/2019. No first instance decision has been adopted in her case. Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of criminal proceedings. 14/03/2023 25/01/2023 5,600     41459/22 23/08/2022 Gábor PELYHE 1983 Karsai Dániel András Budapest   01/03/2023 08/12/2022 3,400     42107/22 25/08/2022 László VARGA 1985 Kiss Dániel Bálint Budapest   07/02/2023 30/11/2022 3,800     46257/22 20/09/2022 Lajos Zsolt ROSTÁS 1976 Kiss Dániel Bálint Budapest Art. 6 (1) - excessive length of criminal proceedings - The applicant is subject to criminal proceedings since 04/07/2019. No first instance decision yet.   Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of criminal proceedings. 14/03/2023 12/12/2022 5,100     46822/22 27/09/2022 Roland VIGLÁSI 1987 Kiss Dániel Bálint Budapest   26/01/2023 23/11/2022 3,900   46823/22 27/09/2022 László VADÁSZI 1978 Kiss Dániel Bálint Budapest Art. 5 (4) - excessive length of judicial review of detention - The obligatory 6-month review was carried out with a delay of 44 days while the 1 year review with a delay of 76 days. 10/02/2023 28/11/2022 4,600   50386/22 19/10/2022 Benjámin Csaba SZŐNYE 1999 Kiss Dániel Bálint Budapest   01/03/2023 21/02/2023 4,000   [1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.