CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 6 avril 2023

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .sA1D3DA2E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s46DB5BA6 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4598CDF { width:70.9pt; display:inline-block } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .s459D9084 { width:131.09pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold }   SECOND SECTION DECISION Application no. 76406/17 Hasan GÜNAY against Türkiye and 14 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 6 April 2023 as a Committee composed of:   Frédéric Krenc , President ,   Diana Sârcu,   Davor Derenčinović , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of the applicants and their representatives is set out in the appendix. The applicants’ various complaints under Article 5 of the Convention were communicated to the Turkish Government (“the Government”), who submitted observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicants, who were invited to submit their own observations. No reply was received to the Registry’s letter. By letters dated 11 October 2022, sent by registered post, the applicants were notified that the period allowed for submission of their observations had expired on 24 August 2022 and that no extension of time had been requested. The applicants’ attention was drawn to Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. The registered letters either returned to the Court as unclaimed or were received by the applicants and to which they did not respond. There are also no previous letters from the applicants informing the Court about the change of address. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. In the light of the foregoing, and in the absence of any special circumstances regarding respect for the rights guaranteed by the Convention and the Protocols thereto, the Court, in accordance with Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention, considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the applications. Accordingly, the cases should be struck out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 11 May 2023.     Viktoriya Maradudina   Frédéric Krenc   Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article 5 of the Convention No. Application no. Case name Lodged on Applicant Year of Birth Place of Residence Nationality Represented by 1. 76406/17 Günay v. Türkiye 06/10/2017 Hasan GÜNAY 1970 Manisa Turkish Mehmet BAŞYİĞİT 2. 45291/18 Şafak v. Türkiye 13/09/2018 Gazi ŞAFAK 1977 Yozgat Turkish Havva Züleyha ARSLAN 3. 50753/18 Yağmurlu v. Türkiye 23/10/2018 Mustafa YAĞMURLU 1990 Adana Turkish Ali Yıldırım KUZUCU 4. 54459/18 Zorlu v. Türkiye 05/11/2018 Ertuğrul ZORLU 1976 Ankara Turkish Yasemin ZORLU 5. 59144/18 Tosun v. Türkiye 28/11/2018 Hüseyin TOSUN 1994 Aksaray Turkish Mehmet TOSUN 6. 3432/19 Türkmen v. Türkiye 28/12/2018 Seyit TÜRKMEN 1988 Konya Turkish Muhammet ERDEN 7. 4118/19 Ünaldı v. Türkiye 27/11/2018 Mustafa ÜNALDI 1969 Eskişehir Turkish Osman Bera YURDAKUL 8. 4300/19 Dilgin v. Türkiye 03/01/2019 Kenan DİLGİN 1986 Turkish Hüseyin AYGÜN 9. 4301/19 Akkaya v. Türkiye 07/01/2019 Ertuğrul AKKAYA 1986 Karahallı Turkish Hüseyin AYGÜN 10. 5257/19 Bayraktar v. Türkiye 14/01/2019 Hazmi BAYRAKTAR 1968 Gümüşhane Turkish Özcan Burak BAYRAKTAR 11. 5413/19 Uyar v. Türkiye 03/01/2019 Doğan UYAR 1967 Çorum Turkish   12. 5476/19 İnam v. Türkiye 30/11/2018 Hasan Hüseyin İNAM 1986 Konya Turkish   13. 5558/19 Kılıç v. Türkiye 25/12/2018 İsmail KILIÇ 1978 Istanbul Turkish Hüseyin BACACI 14. 6321/19 Özata v. Türkiye 26/12/2018 Sinan ÖZATA 1985 Ordu Turkish   15. 14991/20 Arslan v. Türkiye 09/03/2020 Hayrettin ARSLAN 1987 Şanlıurfa Turkish Veysi PEKACAR