CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 17 mai 2023

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s6C5BED22 { margin-left:25.5pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s5E8F5A28 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:25.5pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sE7C30868 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s46DB5BA6 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4598CDF { width:70.9pt; display:inline-block } .s8E0918A8 { width:37.55pt; display:inline-block } .s5AAEE4F1 { width:148.75pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s1359263B { height:24.6pt } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold }   FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 38921/21 Stella ZUHATAGI-FÉSŰ against Hungary and 9 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 17 May 2023 as a Committee composed of:   Alena Poláčková , President ,   Gilberto Felici,   Raffaele Sabato , judges , and Attila Teplán, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the observations submitted by the respondent Government and the observations in reply submitted by the applicants, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants and their representatives is set out in the appended table. The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of civil proceedings were communicated to the Hungarian Government (“the Government”). THE LAW Joinder of the applications Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. Complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (excessive length of civil proceedings) In the present applications, having examined all the material before it, the Court considers that for the reasons stated below, the respondent Government cannot be held liable for the protractedness of the proceedings. In particular, the Court has found that an effective remedy is available in Hungary to provide redress for the alleged grievances (see Szaxon v.   Hungary (dec.), no.   54421/21, 21   March 2023). However, the applicants have not availed themselves of this legal avenue. In view of the above, the Court finds that these complaints are inadmissible for non-exhaustion of domestic remedies and must be rejected in accordance with Article   35   §§   1 and   4 of the Convention. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Declares the applications inadmissible. Done in English and notified in writing on 8 June 2023.     Attila Teplán   Alena Poláčková   Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article   6 § 1 of the Convention (excessive length of civil proceedings) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth/registration   Representative’s name and location Start of proceedings End of proceedings Total length Levels of jurisdiction     38921/21 23/07/2021 Stella ZUHATAGI-FÉSŰ 1975 Karsai Dániel András Budapest 19/10/2011   02/02/2021   9 year(s) and 3 month(s) and 15 day(s) 4 level(s) of jurisdiction       46625/21 08/09/2021 János SEBŐ 1962 Tóth T Balázs Budapest 02/11/2017   25/05/2021   3 year(s) and 6 month(s) and 24 day(s) 1 level(s) of jurisdiction       48773/21 24/09/2021 Dénes VARGA 1959     25/11/2008   21/06/2021   12 year(s) and 6 month(s) and 28 day(s) 2 level(s) of jurisdiction       50754/21 27/09/2021 Ferenc GÁL 1948     24/09/2013   21/06/2021   7 year(s) and 8 month(s) and 29 day(s) 2 level(s) of jurisdiction       53147/21 27/10/2021 Szilvia KOVÁCSNÉ JUHÁSZ 1978 Szmulai István Székesfehérvár 09/06/2009   04/05/2021   11 year(s) and 10 month(s) and 26 day(s) 2 level(s) of jurisdiction       53372/21 20/10/2021 Péter VISZT 1960 Váczi Péter Győr 21/05/2013   28/09/2021   8 year(s) and 4 month(s) and 8 day(s) 4 level(s) of jurisdiction       54424/21 27/10/2021 László SÁRAI 1969 Gál Anna Budapest 31/07/2012   06/09/2021   9 year(s) and 1 month(s) and 7 day(s) 2 level(s) of jurisdiction       54445/21 27/10/2021 SELENIUM PHARMA BT 1993     13/11/2009   27/07/2021   11 year(s) and 8 month(s) and 15 day(s) 3 level(s) of jurisdiction         54558/21 06/10/2021 László BIRTA 1965 Karsai Dániel András Budapest 28/12/2009   13/04/2021   11 year(s) and 3 month(s) and 17 day(s) 4 level(s) of jurisdiction     61166/21 17/12/2021 György GYETVAI 1958 Gerencsér Éva Budapest 28/01/2015   12/05/2021   6 year(s) and 3 month(s) and 15 day(s) 2 level(s) of jurisdiction