CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 1 juin 2023

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4598CDF { width:70.9pt; display:inline-block } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .sF5DDD244 { width:144.1pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s8EDCE8B1 { height:45.9pt }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 46518/16 Daniel-Vasile STANCIU against Romania and 8 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 1   June   2023 as a Committee composed of:   Tim Eicke , President ,   Branko Lubarda,   Ana Maria Guerra Martins , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of the applicants is set out in the appendix. The applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Romanian Government, who submitted observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicants, who were invited to submit their own observations (see the appended table for the relevant dates). No reply was received by the Court. By letters sent by registered post, the applicants were notified that the time allowed for the submission of their observations had expired. The applicants’ attention was further drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. No reply to these letters has been received by the Court (see details in the appended table) and there are no previous letters from the applicants informing the Court about a change of address. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. In the light of the foregoing, the Court concludes that the applicants may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue the applications (Article   37 §   1   (a) of the Convention). Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in   fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto which require the continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 22 June 2023.     Viktoriya Maradudina   Tim Eicke   Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article   3 of the Convention (inadequate conditions of detention) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Representative’s name and location Date of the applicant’s last letter to the Court Date of sending Government’s observations to the applicant Time limit of submission of response by the applicant Date of the Court’s registered letter Date of receipt of the registered letter Date of the applicant’s release from prison     46518/16 23/09/2016 Daniel-Vasile STANCIU 1974     08/09/2020 02/08/2022 13/09/2022 16/12/2022 30/12/2022 Signed by the applicant   In detention in Mărgineni Prison according to the last applicant’s letter of 08/09/2020     66144/16 10/11/2016 Costel SITEAVU 1967     04/09/2020 15/11/2022 03/01/2023 27/01/2023 08/02/2023 Signed by the applicant 05/05/2020     893/17 19/01/2017 Nicolae PÂRTAN 1985     21/02/2022 21/09/2022 02/11/2022 17/11/2022 25/11/2022 Illegible signature In detention in Mărgineni Prison according to the Government’s observations of 13/09/2022     909/17 30/01/2017 Ionuț-Virgil SEFER 1994     26/10/2020 02/08/2022 13/09/2022 29/09/2022 01/12/2022 Returned to sender as “unclaimed” 02/03/2021     6061/17 02/02/2017 Mihai SCARLAT 1966 Dorin Vlăsceanu Ploiești 13/07/2022 27/09/2022 08/11/2022 23/11/2022 02/12/2022 Illegible signature 14/11/2017     19192/17 28/02/2017 Petru LUPU 1971     22/01/2020 21/11/2022 09/01/2023 27/01/2023 27/03/2023 Returned to sender as “unclaimed – the recipient moved abroad” 28/01/2020     38223/17 17/05/2017 Sunai SULIMAN 1977 Andreea-Gabriela Cadar Galați 07/07/2022 27/09/2022 08/11/2022 23/11/2022 08/12/2022 Signed by the applicant’s representative   05/12/2016     75105/17 16/11/2017 Ernö VARGA 1973     23/06/2022 27/09/2022 08/11/2022 23/11/2022 05/12/2022 Illegible signature 21/12/2021     82262/17 28/11/2017 Silviu HOHOLEA 1981 Andreea-Gabriela Cadar Galați 07/07/2022 27/09/2022 08/11/2022 23/11/2022 08/12/2022 Signed by the applicant’s representative   29/06/2018