CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 15 juin 2023

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s6C5BED22 { margin-left:25.5pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s743F3A55 { margin-right:0pt; margin-left:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s2044A09A { margin-left:6.51pt; margin-bottom:6pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:1.99pt; font-weight:normal; font-style:italic } .sAE6FB95D { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:32.01pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:1.99pt; font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s5E8F5A28 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:25.5pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s3537C2D6 { font-weight:normal } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4598CDF { width:70.9pt; display:inline-block } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .sF5DDD244 { width:144.1pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s4A832537 { width:100.88%; margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s5323E288 { width:13.26%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s5977794E { width:17%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s40A64FEA { width:14.32%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sE7F636FF { width:14.2%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sF79E9441 { width:11.86%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s5E06BC6F { width:29.36%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sAA30D3C2 { width:13.26%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s820C353E { width:17%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sAF147033 { width:14.32%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sE29A60B5 { width:14.2%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sD7656B2A { width:11.86%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sE9BE2F26 { width:29.36%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 15759/21 Sandro RESSUREIÇÃO LOURENÇO against Portugal (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 15   June 2023 as a Committee composed of:   Tim Eicke , President ,   Branko Lubarda,   Ana Maria Guerra Martins , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 5   March 2021, Having regard to the observations submitted by the respondent Government and the observations in reply submitted by the applicant, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The applicant’s details are set out in the appended table. The applicant was represented by Mr V. Carreto, a lawyer practising in Torres Vedras. The applicant’s complaints under Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention and lack of an effective remedy in this respect were communicated to the Portuguese Government (“the Government”). THE LAW Complaints under Article 3 of the Convention (inadequate conditions of detention) Conditions of detention in Pinheiro da Cruz Prison between 16   May 2019 and 26 March 2021 In the present application, having examined all the material before it and the parties’ arguments, the Court finds that it cannot be established that the applicant suffered in Pinheiro da Cruz Prison between 16   May 2019 to 26   March 2021 from severe overcrowding of the kind that could entail on its own a violation of Article 3 ( see Muršić v. Croatia [GC], no. 7334/13, §   114, 20   October 2016). Nor it can be found that the cumulative effect of the other aspects of the detention which the applicant complained about reached the threshold of severity required to characterise the treatment as inhuman or degrading within the meaning of Article 3 (see Bokor v. Portugal (dec.) no.   5227/18, §§ 32-34, 10 December 2020). In view of the above, the Court finds that these complaints are manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected in accordance with Article   35   §§   3 and   4 of the Convention. Conditions of detention in Pinheiro da Cruz Prison between 15   January and 16 May 2019 Considering the conclusion above, the Court finds that the applicant’s transfer to the open regime on 16 May 2019 interrupted the “continued situation” of his conditions of detention. The applicant’s complaints concerning his conditions of detention prior to that transfer are therefore belated (see Ananyev and Others v. Russia , nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, §§   77-78, 10 January 2012). These complaints must therefore be rejected in accordance with Article   35 §§   1 and 4 of the Convention. Complaints under Article 13 of the Convention (lack of an effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention) The applicant also raised a complaint under Article 13 of the Convention alleging lack of any effective remedy in respect of the inadequate conditions of detention. According to the Court’s established case-law, Article 13 applies only where an individual has an “arguable claim” to be the victim of a violation of a Convention right (see Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom , 27 April 1988, §   52, Series A no. 131). Having regard to the findings above in respect of the applicant’s complaints under Article 3 of the Convention, the Court concludes that the applicant did not have an “arguable claim” and that therefore Article 13 is not applicable. It follows that this part of the application must be rejected in accordance with Article   35   §§ 3 (a) and   4 of the Convention. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Declares the application inadmissible. Done in English and notified in writing on 6 July 2023.     Viktoriya Maradudina   Tim Eicke   Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX Application raising complaints under Articles   3 and 13 of the Convention (inadequate conditions of detention and lack of an effective remedy in this regard) Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth   Representative’s name and location Facility Start and end date Duration Sq. m per inmate Specific grievances 15759/21 05/03/2021 Sandro RESSUREIÇÃO LOURENÇO 1976 Vítor Carreto Torres Vedras Pinheiro da Cruz Prison 15/01/2019 to 16/05/2019 4 months and 2 days           *** Pinheiro da Cruz 16/05/2019 to 21/10/2020 1 year and 5 months and 6 days   *** Pinheiro da Cruz 21/10/2020 to 26/03/2021 5 months and 6   days 2 inmates 2.78 m² 1 toilet             *** 3 inmates 5.50 m² 1 toilet       *** 3 inmates 7.17 m² 1 toilet overcrowding, inadequate temperature, lack of fresh air, no or restricted access to toilet, poor quality of food, lack of or insufficient quantity of food, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of privacy, exposure to asbestos, lack of privacy for toilet, lack of privacy in the showers, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of requisite medical assistance   *** lack of social distancing measures to tackle Covid-19 pandemic, lack of fresh air         *** Idem