CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 14 septembre 2023

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .sF2EF8B01 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:11pt } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s9D48DD53 { margin-top:6pt; margin-left:21.25pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:7.1pt; text-align:justify; font-size:10pt } .sE7C30868 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4598CDF { width:70.9pt; display:inline-block } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .sFC02FF89 { width:3.34%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE110381E { width:8.4%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s1AE9AF86 { width:15.68%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s38C4E992 { width:19.62%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s7FDD75C9 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; letter-spacing:-0.2pt; color:#474747 } .sBD1D1046 { width:14.7%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s7D1B163B { width:18.64%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s598389F9 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:12pt } .sB5B1C99F { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sD35D798C { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .s581AE1D3 { width:3.34%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s8FDBB2A7 { width:8.4%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF5EDC444 { width:15.68%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sEE73AB42 { width:19.62%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s7348944F { width:14.7%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s524D85B2 { width:18.64%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sCC018295 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .s653E6C45 { font-family:Arial; font-size:6.67pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } .sB343B0AA { font-family:Arial; font-size:6.67pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   THIRD SECTION DECISION This version was rectified on 14 September 2023 under Rule 81 of the Rules of Court.   Application no. 20985/20 Mohamed Seifedin BOULMAZAT against Greece and 76 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 6 April 2023 as a Committee composed of:   Darian Pavli , President ,   Ioannis Ktistakis,   Oddný Mjöll Arnardóttir , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the declarations submitted by the respondent Government requesting the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants is set out in the appended table. The applicants were represented by Konstantinos Tsitselikis and Antonios   Spathis, lawyers practising in Thessaloniki. The applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Greek Government (“the Government”). In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under Article 13 of the Convention. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Government informed the Court that they proposed to make unilateral declarations with a view to resolving the issues raised by these complaints. They further requested the Court to strike out the applications in accordance with Article 37 of the Convention. The Government acknowledged the inadequate conditions of detention. In some of the applications, they further acknowledged that there has been a violation of Article 13 of the Convention. They offered to pay the applicants the amounts detailed in the appended table and invited the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (c) of the Convention. The amounts would be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases. The applicants were sent the terms of the Government’s unilateral declarations several weeks before the date of this decision. The Court has not received a response from the applicants accepting the terms of the declarations. The Court observes that Article   37 §   1   (c) enables it to strike a case out of its list if: “... for any other reason established by the Court, it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the application”. Thus, it may strike out applications under Article 37 § 1 (c) on the basis of a unilateral declaration by a respondent Government even if the applicants wish the examination of the cases to be continued (see, in particular, the Tahsin Acar v. Turkey judgment (preliminary objections) [GC], no.   26307/95, §§   75 ‑ 77, ECHR 2003-VI). The Court has established clear and extensive case-law concerning complaints relating to the inadequate conditions of detention (see, for example, Muršić v. Croatia [GC], no. 7334/13, 20 October 2016). Noting the admissions contained in the Government’s declarations as well as the amount of compensation proposed – which is consistent with the amounts awarded in similar cases – the Court considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the applications (Article   37 §   1   (c)). In the light of the above considerations, the Court is satisfied that respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto does not require it to continue the examination of the applications (Article   37 §   1 in fine ). Finally, the Court emphasises that, should the Government fail to comply with the terms of their unilateral declarations, the applications may be restored to the list in accordance with Article   37 §   2 of the Convention (see Josipović v. Serbia (dec.), no.   18369/07, 4   March 2008). In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Takes note of the terms of the respondent Government’s declarations and of the arrangements for ensuring compliance with the undertakings referred to therein; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article   37 §   1   (c) of the Convention. Done in English and notified in writing on 11 May 2023.     Viktoriya Maradudina   Darian Pavli   Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article 3 of the Convention (inadequate conditions of detention) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Other complaints under well-established case-law   Date of receipt of Government’s declaration Date of receipt of applicant’s comments Amount awarded for non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros) [1]     20985/20 09/04/2020 Mohamed Seifedin BOULMAZAT 1997 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention- 12/10/2022 31/10/2022 3,900     43856/20 28/09/2020 Chrysovalantis AMBETIN 1988 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention- 27/10/2022 15/11/2022 4,700 [1]     48830/20 21/10/2020 Nikos DELLAPORTAS 1983 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention- 26/10/2022 03/11/2022 6,600     60744/21 06/12/2021 Sergo ELEZAJ 1995 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention- 07/07/2022 27/07/2022 4,400     60745/21 06/12/2021 Andreas KOKKINOS 1986 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 07/07/2022 02/09/2022 7,200     60752/21 06/12/2021 Michail VLACHOS 1974   07/07/2022 27/07/2022 7,600     60753/21 06/12/2021 Frederik SHKARPA 1990   07/07/2022 27/07/2022 3,900     1057/22 21/12/2021 Apostolos AETOPOULOS 1985 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 28/09/2022 30/10/2022 3,250     1097/22 21/12/2021 Antonios AGGELOMATIS 1978 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 28/09/2022 30/10/2022 4,900   1102/22 21/12/2021 Ioannis BATZIAKIS 1991 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 28/09/2022 30/10/2022 3,250   1108/22 21/12/2021 Alexandros BINISIS 1991 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 28/09/2022 31/10/2022 3,900   1112/22 21/12/2021 Antonios HATZIANTONIOU 1959 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 28/09/2022 31/10/2022 2,600   1117/22 21/12/2021 Damianos HIONIDIS 1991 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 28/09/2022 31/10/2022 6,000   1126/22 21/12/2021 Antonios GEORGOPOULOS 1983 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 12/10/2022 06/12/2022 3,200   1145/22 21/12/2021 Konstantinos IORDANOU 1971 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 12/10/2022 31/10/2022 3,300   1154/22 21/12/2021 Georgios KALOURIS 1987 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 12/10/2022 31/10/2022 4,300   1182/22 21/12/2021 Dionysios KOUTROUMBANOS 1978 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 12/10/2022 31/10/2022 3,300   1188/22 21/12/2021 Petros LAMBROPOULOS 1991 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 12/10/2022 31/10/2022 3,200   1239/22 21/12/2021 Georgios LOUKAS 1989 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 12/10/2022 31/10/2022 4,900   1246/22 21/12/2021 Panagiotis LYMBEROPOULOS 1963 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 13/10/2022 30/10/2022 4,300   1263/22 21/12/2021 Christos MILAS 1970 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 13/10/2022 31/10/2022 3,900   1291/22 21/12/2021 Ioannis PLAVOUKOS 1981 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 13/10/2022 31/10/2022 3,300   1303/22 21/12/2021 Pavlos PROVATAS 1990 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 13/10/2022 31/10/2022 4,300   1307/22 21/12/2021 Apostolos THEODOROU 1979 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 13/10/2022 31/10/2022 4,700   1320/22 21/12/2021 Georgios THEODOROPOULOS 1974 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 28/09/2022 31/10/2022 3,600   1328/22 21/12/2021 Spyridon THEODOROPOULOS 1969 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 13/10/2022 31/10/2022 4,700   1336/22 21/12/2021 Xenofon TROVAS 1967 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 13/10/2022 30/10/2022 4,500   1350/22 21/12/2021 Theodoros-Christos TSIAFIS 1984 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 28/09/2022 31/10/2022 4,300   1354/22 21/12/2021 Ioannis TSINIAS 1979 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 28/09/2022 31/10/2022 3,600   2298/22 09/04/2020 Ahcen BOUMAZBEUR 1996 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 29/09/2022 31/10/2022 5,300   2306/22 09/04/2020 Nordine EL GHAZOULI 1995 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 29/09/2022 31/10/2022 5,300   2314/22 09/04/2020 Alkis FEIMOGLOU 1992 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 29/09/2022 31/10/2022 4,800   2321/22 09/04/2020 Gilmas TOPRAK 1988 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 29/09/2022 31/10/2022 3,000   5221/22 28/09/2020 Chrysostomos ALI 1984 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 27/10/2022 15/11/2022 7,000   5222/22 28/09/2020 Demir ANGELOV 1987 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 27/10/2022 15/11/2022 4,700   5224/22 28/09/2020 Mitko ANGELOV 1978 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 27/10/2022 15/11/2022 10,000   5225/22 28/09/2020 Dionysios-Rafael ARABATZIS 1988 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 27/10/2022 15/11/2022 7,200   5226/22 28/09/2020 Paraskevas- Georgios CHOUSEINOGLOU 1998 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 27/10/2022 15/11/2022 2,600   5227/22 28/09/2020 Lefteris CHRISTAKIS 1977 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 27/10/2022 15/11/2022 4,500   5228/22 28/09/2020 Christos EVAGGELOPOULOS 1983 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 27/10/2022 15/11/2022 7,600   5230/22 28/09/2020 Niikitas FEIMOGLOU 1987 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 27/10/2022 15/11/2022 4,500   5236/22 28/09/2020 Anastasios KARAGIANNIS 1989 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 27/10/2022 15/11/2022 5,250   5237/22 28/09/2020 Emmanouil KARAGIANNIS 1977 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 27/10/2022 15/11/2022 11,700   5239/22 28/09/2020 Evaggelos KOLONIAS 1973 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 27/10/2022 15/11/2022 6,400   5247/22 28/09/2020 Zamir MEHMET 1985 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 18/10/2022 03/11/2022 2,300   5250/22 28/09/2020 Aggelos MOURTZIS 1994 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 18/10/2022 03/11/2022 4,700   5251/22 28/09/2020 Nikolaos NIKITAS 1995 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 18/10/2022 03/11/2022 6,250   5252/22 28/09/2020 Andreas PANAGIOTOPOULOS 1975 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 18/10/2022 03/11/2022 2,950   5254/22 28/09/2020 Dimitrios PASIOS 1993 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 18/10/2022 03/11/2022 7,600   5256/22 28/09/2020 Mousa ROUSTEMOGLOU 1983 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 18/10/2022 03/11/2022 4,700   5258/22 28/09/2020 Dimitrios SAMARAS 1979 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 18/10/2022 03/11/2022 7,400   5260/22 28/09/2020 Evaggelos SABRIOGLOU 1984 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 18/10/2022 03/11/2022 7,000   5261/22 28/09/2020 Nikolaos TAHIRI 1987 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 18/10/2022 03/11/2022 1,300   5263/22 28/09/2020 Rasim TAHIRI 1968 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 18/10/2022 03/11/2022 4,900   5265/22 28/09/2020 Panagiotis - Konstantinos TRABOUZANIS 1991 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 18/10/2022 03/11/2022 2,950   5266/22 28/09/2020 Alexandros TSAKIRIS 1989 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 18/10/2022 03/11/2022 10,100   5374/22 21/10/2020 Panagiotis DRITSAS 1963 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 26/10/2022 03/11/2022 7,200   5375/22 21/10/2020 Fotios FOTIADIS 1983 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 26/10/2022 03/11/2022 7,700   5376/22 21/10/2020 Irodis GEORGIADIS 1969 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 26/10/2022 03/11/2022 7,400   5377/22 21/10/2020 Stylianos GEORGOPOULOS 1988 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 26/10/2022 03/11/2022 9,000   5378/22 21/10/2020 Safet HASHIMI 1962 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 26/10/2022 03/11/2022 12,300   5379/22 21/10/2020 Fotios KARACHALIOS 1982 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 26/10/2022 03/11/2022 4,100   5380/22 21/10/2020 Dionysios KARACHALIOS 1987 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 26/10/2022 03/11/2022 4,400   5382/22 21/10/2020 Athanasios-Nikolaos KARAGIANNIS 1984 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 26/10/2022 03/11/2022 4,200   5385/22 21/10/2020 Fotios KOUTRAS-KOURAKIS 1969 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 26/10/2022 03/11/2022 5,000   5386/22 21/10/2020 Sholla KOSTANDIN 1994 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 26/10/2022 03/11/2022 4,100   5388/22 21/10/2020 Paraskevas KRITIKOS 1988 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 26/10/2022 03/11/2022 5,700   5389/22 21/10/2020 Georgios LOUKAS 1970 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 26/10/2022 03/11/2022 9,800   5390/22 21/10/2020 Nikolai MARINOV 1994 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 26/10/2022 03/11/2022 6,200   5391/22 21/10/2020 Petros MARKOULIS 1994 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 27/10/2022 03/11/2022 7,400   5392/22 21/10/2020 Antonios MENTES 1989 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 27/10/2022 03/11/2022 9,200   5395/22 21/10/2020 Spyridon SAITOPOULOS 1976 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 27/10/2022 03/11/2022 7,000   5397/22 21/10/2020 Pavlos SAITOPOULOS 1991 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 27/10/2022 03/11/2022 5,000   5399/22 21/10/2020 Ioannis TSARITSANIS 1992 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 27/10/2022 03/11/2022 4,100   5400/22 21/10/2020 Christos ZARALIKAS 1984 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 27/10/2022 03/11/2022 9,400   5402/22 21/10/2020 Zisimos ZARALIKAS 1990 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 27/10/2022 03/11/2022 6,300   5403/22 20/10/2020 Evaggelos ZAFEIROPOULOS 1988 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 27/10/2022 03/11/2022 5,600   [1] Rectified on 14 September 2023: the amount was “9,900”. [1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants