CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 14 septembre 2023

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4598CDF { width:70.9pt; display:inline-block } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .s8D17D8A5 { width:127.42pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 26011/16 Mircea STROIA against Romania and 13 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 14   September 2023 as a Committee composed of:   Faris Vehabović , President ,   Anja Seibert-Fohr,   Anne Louise Bormann , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of the applicants is set out in the appendix. The applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Romanian Government, who submitted observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicants, who were invited to submit their own observations (see the appended table for the relevant dates). No reply was received by the Court. By letters sent by registered post, the applicants were notified that the time allowed for the submission of their observations had expired (see the appended table for the relevant dates). The applicants’ attention was further drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. The registered letters were received by the applicants (see details in the appended table). No reply to these letters has been received by the Court and there are no previous letters from the applicants informing the Court about a change of address. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. In the light of the foregoing, the Court concludes that the applicants may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue the applications (Article 37 § 1   (a) of the Convention). Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto which require the continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 5 October 2023.     Viktoriya Maradudina   Faris Vehabović   Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article   3 of the Convention (inadequate conditions of detention) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Representative’s name and location Date of the applicant’s last letter to the Court Date of sending Government’s observations to the applicant Time-limit for submission of response by the applicant Date of the Court’s registered letter Date of receipt/return of the registered letter     26011/16 15/06/2016 Mircea STROIA 1981     09/03/2021 28/02/2023 11/04/2023 22/05/2023 30/05/2023 Signed by the prison representative     33435/16 25/05/2016 Tiberiu PORCAR 1975     15/12/2020 04/08/2022 15/09/2022 15/05/2023 24/05/2023 Signed by the applicant’s wife     37385/16 03/10/2016 Marian ALBU 1972     27/04/2021 10/03/2023 21/04/2023 02/06/2023 12/06/2023 Illegible signature     39162/16 01/08/2016 Gigel BOGDAN 1985     13/01/2021 28/02/2023 11/04/2023 22/05/2023 31/05/2023 Signed by the prison representative     39432/16 01/08/2016 Vasile GRIGORE 1987     03/06/2022 28/02/2023 11/04/2023 22/05/2023 Handed over on 02/06/2023 (according to the Romanian Post Tracking System)     43996/16 13/09/2016 Marius-Stelian PETRESCU 1970     7/09/2020 28/02/2023 11/04/2023 22/05/2023 30/05/2023 Signed by the prison representative     48567/16 08/08/2016 Daniel-Ciprian DOBOȘ 1983 Tonică Daniela Husi 3/09/2020 28/02/2023 11/04/2023 22/05/2023 22/05/2023 Downloaded from the Court’s Electronic Communication Service platform (eComms) by the representative     66150/16 20/01/2017 Vasile Cristian LUPU 1988     22/03/2022 28/02/2023 11/04/2023 22/05/2023 06/06/2023 Signed by the prison representative     7684/17 21/04/2017 Iulian GHERASIM 1980     28/03/2022 04/08/2022 15/09/2022 15/05/2023 26/05/2023 Illegible signature   10980/17 27/02/2017 Gheorghiță MALANCA 1979     15/09/2020 28/02/2023 11/04/2023 22/05/2023 Handed over on 31/05/2023 (according to the Romanian Post Tracking System)     24199/17 24/07/2017 Ion DODU 1966     09/05/2022 04/08/2022 15/09/2022 15/05/2023 24/05/2023 Illegible signature   23165/18 09/05/2018 Ioana FLOREA 1973     24/01/2023 22/02/2023 05/04/2023 22/05/2023 31/05/2023 Signed by the applicant   36075/18 18/07/2018 Zeno TOBU 1970     24/02/2021 22/02/2023 05/04/2023 22/05/2023 09/06/2023 Signed by the applicant’s mother   42138/18 29/08/2018 Adrian GHERGHE 1971     17/02/2021 22/02/2023 05/04/2023 22/05/2023 30/05/2023 Illegible signature