CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 28 septembre 2023

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4598CDF { width:70.9pt; display:inline-block } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .s4EC3C151 { width:116.76pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7FDD75C9 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; letter-spacing:-0.2pt; color:#474747 } .s598389F9 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:12pt } .sB5B1C99F { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sD35D798C { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sADADF4A7 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .sB343B0AA { font-family:Arial; font-size:6.67pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 1142/23 Silviana TIDILI and Others against Italy and 9 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 28   September 2023 as a Committee composed of:   Krzysztof Wojtyczek , President ,   Lətif Hüseynov,   Ivana Jelić , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the declarations submitted by the respondent Government requesting the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases, and the applicants’ replies to these declarations, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants is set out in the appended table. The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article   1 of Protocol No.   1 concerning the non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of “Pinto” domestic decisions were communicated to the Italian Government (“the Government”). The Government submitted a declaration with a view to resolving the issues raised by these complaints. They further requested the Court to strike out the applications. The Government acknowledged the non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of “Pinto” domestic decisions. They offered to pay the applicants the amounts detailed in the appended table and invited the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases in accordance with Article   37 §   1   (c) of the Convention. The amounts would be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The Government also undertake to ensure the enforcement of the domestic decisions under consideration in the cases concerned (see appended table) within the same three-month period, and to pay any costs of the domestic enforcement proceedings. The payment and the enforcement of the domestic decisions in the cases concerned will constitute the final resolution of the cases. The applicants informed the Court that they agreed to the terms of the declarations. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Court finds that, following the applicants’ express agreement to the terms of the declaration made by the Government, the cases should be treated as a friendly settlement between the parties. It therefore takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify the continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article   39 of the Convention. Done in English and notified in writing on 19 October 2023.     Viktoriya Maradudina   Krzysztof Wojtyczek   Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of “Pinto” domestic decisions) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth   Representative’s name and location Relevant domestic decision Date of receipt of Government’s declaration Date of receipt of applicant’s acceptance Amount awarded for non ‑ pecuniary damage per applicant/household (in euros) [1] Amount awarded for costs and expenses per application (in euros) [2]     1142/23 23/12/2022 (4 applicants) Silviana TIDILI 1952   Bruna TIDILI 1951   Maria Augusta TIDILI 1942   Mario Antonio TIDILI 1954 Pibiri Ilaria Cagliari Rome Court of Appeal, R.G. 59035/2011, 31/03/2017 05/07/2023 27/07/2023 200 30     1154/23 23/12/2022 (3 applicants) Alessandra SERRA 1977   Gianluca SERRA 1978   Gianluigi SERRA 1978 Pibiri Ilaria Cagliari Rome Court of Appeal, R.G. 59035/2012, 31/03/2017 05/07/2023 27/07/2023 200 30     1165/23 23/12/2022 (5 applicants) Maria Rosaria CAPPAI 1952     Giorgia CAPPAI 1979   Maria Antonietta CAPPAI 1950   Valentina CAPPAI 1980   Assunta MEREU 1952 Pibiri Ilaria Cagliari Rome Court of Appeal R.G. 59035/11, 31/03/2017 05/07/2023 27/07/2023 200 30     1178/23 23/12/2022 (3 applicants) Roberto MEDDA 1959   Maria Luisa MEDDA 1960   Raffaele MEDDA 1965 Pibiri Ilaria Cagliari Rome Court of Appeal, R.G. 59035/2011, 31/03/2017 05/07/2023 27/07/2023 200 30     1187/23 23/12/2022 (3 applicants) Eligio OLLA 1969   Emilia ATZORI 1932   Marinella OLLA 1956 Pibiri Ilaria Cagliari Rome Court of Appeal, R.G. 59035/2011, 31/03/2017 05/07/2023 27/07/2023 200 30     1205/23 23/12/2022 Household Pietrina Angela FODDI 1955   Salvatore PILLOSU 1991 Pibiri Ilaria Cagliari Rome Court of Appeal R.G. 59035/11, 31/03/2017 05/07/2023 27/07/2023 200 30     1211/23 23/12/2022 Maria Giacinta COCCO 1961 Pibiri Ilaria Cagliari Rome Court of Appeal R.G. 59035/11, 31/03/2017 05/07/2023 27/07/2023 200 30     1216/23 23/12/2022 (4 applicants) Giorgio PILLOSU 1952   Carlo PILLOSU 1955   Maria Raffaela PILLOSU 1949   Marisetta PILLOSU 1956 Pibiri Ilaria Cagliari Rome Court of Appeal R.G. 59035/11, 31/03/2017 05/07/2023 27/07/2023 200 30     1249/23 23/12/2022 (8 applicants) Luigi FARRIS 1956   Giuseppe MANDIS 1940   Leonardo MANNIAS 1950   Mario SARAIS 1950     Maria Luigia SERCI 1931   Mario SERCI 1950   Luigi SERRA 1948   Giuseppe VACCA 1953 Pibiri Ilaria Cagliari Rome Court of Appeal R.G. 59035/11, 31/03/2017 05/07/2023 27/07/2023 200 30   1291/23 23/12/2022 (9 applicants) Annalisa LAI 1963   Eligio COGHE 1953   Giampiero COGHE 1955   Maria Gabriella COGHE 1950   Maria Antonietta LAI 1953   Pierluigi LAI 1950   Salvatore LAI 1955   Eligio OLLA 1969   Marinella OLLA 1956 Pibiri Ilaria Cagliari Rome Court of Appeal R.G. 59035/11, 31/03/2017 05/07/2023 27/07/2023 200 30   [1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants. [2] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.