CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 12 octobre 2023

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s7CB9076 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s4B08A3BC { width:27.19pt; display:inline-block } .sF920FE69 { font-family:Arial; color:#f8f8f8 } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .s8D17D8A5 { width:127.42pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s4AFCF539 { width:120%; margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s16DE818D { width:3.08%; border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sE1A7A04C { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#424242 } .s6D36326A { width:11.34%; border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sD77449DE { width:16.34%; border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sCFCC2D1C { width:13.48%; border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s6DEC8627 { width:15.38%; border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s5D93B647 { width:12.5%; border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sE751F072 { width:11.54%; border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sA33249DA { width:3.08%; border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s3DCB47AD { width:11.34%; border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt } .sE5D55C57 { width:16.34%; border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sE8A16B6F { width:13.48%; border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt } .s6A6C4FF6 { width:15.38%; border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt } .s2DDBCD6A { width:12.5%; border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt } .sC9A4D8D4 { width:11.54%; border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 34405/16 Ionel TURCU against Romania and 3 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 12   October   2023 as a Committee composed of:   Faris Vehabović , President ,   Anja Seibert-Fohr,   Anne Louise Bormann , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of the applicants is set out in the appendix. The applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Romanian Government, who submitted observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicants, who were invited to submit their own observations (see the appended table for the relevant dates). No reply was received by the Court. By letters sent by registered post, the applicants were notified that the time allowed for the submission of their observations had expired (see the appended table for the relevant dates). The applicants’ attention was further drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. The registered letters returned to the Court (see details in the appended table). There are no previous letters from the applicants informing the Court about a change of address. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. In the light of the foregoing, the Court concludes that the applicants may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue the applications (Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention). Furthermore, in accordance with Article   37   §   1 in   fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto which require the continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 16 November 2023.   {signature_p_2}   Viktoriya Maradudina   Faris Vehabović   Acting Deputy Registrar   President   APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article   3 of the Convention (inadequate conditions of detention) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Date of the applicant’s last letter to the Court Date of sending Government’s observations to the applicant Time ‑ limit for submission of response by the applicant Date of the Court’s registered letter Date of return of the registered letter     34405/16 13/07/2016 Ionel TURCU 1986 14/04/2021 28/03/2023 09/05/2023 20/06/2023 27/07/2023 (moved)     64350/16 30/12/2016 Scarlat VLAD 1970 13/05/2022 28/03/2023 09/05/2023 20/06/2023 27/07/2023 (moved)     1365/18 23/01/2018 Nicolae DRUGAN 1970 31/08/2020 28/03/2023 09/05/2023 20/06/2023 27/07/2023 (moved)     52860/19 23/03/2020 Marian MARŞAVELA 1991 02/02/2023 28/03/2023 09/05/2023 01/06/2023 24/07/2023 (unclaimed)