CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 12 octobre 2023

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4598CDF { width:70.9pt; display:inline-block } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .s8D17D8A5 { width:127.42pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7FDD75C9 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; letter-spacing:-0.2pt; color:#474747 } .sD7287D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:9pt } .sB5B1C99F { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sE3DA80B3 { font-family:Arial; font-size:6pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sB217F55D { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; font-size:8pt } .sB217F55A { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; font-size:5pt } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .sB343B0AA { font-family:Arial; font-size:6.67pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 } .s8EB5F569 { font-family:Arial; font-size:6.67pt; vertical-align:super }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 55106/22 Dragan MAJSTORAC against Serbia and 27 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 12   October 2023 as a Committee composed of:   Faris Vehabović , President ,   Anja Seibert-Fohr,   Anne Louise Bormann , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants is set out in the appended table. The applicants were represented by Ms A. Luković, a lawyer practising in Belgrade. . The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article   1 of Protocol No.   1 concerning the non-enforcement of domestic decisions given against socially/State-owned companies were communicated to the Serbian Government (“the Government”). The complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under Article 13 of the Convention (see appended table). The Court received the friendly-settlement declarations, signed by the parties, under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Serbia in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table. These amounts will be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above ‑ mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The Government also undertake to ensure the enforcement of the domestic decisions under consideration in the cases concerned (see appended table) within the same three-month period, and to pay any costs of the domestic enforcement proceedings. The payment and the enforcement of the domestic decisions in the cases concerned will constitute the final resolution of the cases. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article   39 of the Convention. Done in English and notified in writing on 16 November 2023.     Viktoriya Maradudina   Faris Vehabović   Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article   6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (non-enforcement of domestic decisions given against socially/State-owned companies) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Other complaints under well-established case-law   Date of receipt of Government’s declaration Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration Amount awarded for non-pecuniary damage per applicant (in euros) [1] 2 Amount awarded for costs and expenses per application (in euros) 3     55106/22 17/11/2022 Dragan MAJSTORAC 1954 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic decisions - effectiveness of the constitutional appeal in this particular case in view of the length of the proceedings before the Constitutional Court     03/07/2023 10/07/2023 1,000 250     55118/22 21/11/2022 Ondrej ČERVENJI 1963 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic decisions - effectiveness of the constitutional appeal in this particular case in view of the length of the proceedings before the Constitutional Court     03/07/2023 10/07/2023 1,000 250     55123/22 21/11/2022 Hana SABADOŠ 1957 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic decisions - effectiveness of the constitutional appeal in this particular case in view of the length of the proceedings before the Constitutional Court     03/07/2023 10/07/2023 1,000 250     55131/22 21/11/2022 Tamara VANOVIĆ 1979 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic decisions - effectiveness of the constitutional appeal in this particular case in view of the length of the proceedings before the Constitutional Court   03/07/2023 10/07/2023 1,000 30     55132/22 17/11/2022 Dragomir MARKOVIĆ 1948 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic decisions - effectiveness of the constitutional appeal in this particular case in view of the length of the proceedings before the Constitutional Court   03/07/2023 10/07/2023 1,000 30     55137/22 17/11/2022 Mita VUKOVIĆ 1950 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic decisions - effectiveness of the constitutional appeal in this particular case in view of the length of the proceedings before the Constitutional Court   03/07/2023 10/07/2023 1,000 30     55142/22 17/11/2022 Mlađen RADOVIĆ 1954 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic decisions - effectiveness of the constitutional appeal in this particular case in view of the length of the proceedings before the Constitutional Court   03/07/2023 10/07/2023 1,000 30     55156/22 21/11/2022 Nada PETROVAČKI 1962 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic decisions - effectiveness of the constitutional appeal in this particular case in view of the length of the proceedings before the Constitutional Court   03/07/2023 10/07/2023 1,000 30     55167/22 17/11/2022 Zorica ASURDŽIĆ 1958 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic decisions - effectiveness of the constitutional appeal in this particular case in view of the length of the proceedings before the Constitutional Court   03/07/2023 10/07/2023 1,000 30   55177/22 17/11/2022 Ljeposava AKIK 1951 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic decisions - effectiveness of the constitutional appeal in this particular case in view of the length of the proceedings before the Constitutional Court   03/07/2023 10/07/2023 1,000 30   55184/22 17/11/2022 Slavica STOJANOVIĆ 1964 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic decisions - effectiveness of the constitutional appeal in this particular case in view of the length of the proceedings before the Constitutional Court   03/07/2023 10/07/2023 1,000 30   55205/22 21/11/2022 Nadežda RAŠIĆ 1959 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic decisions - effectiveness of the constitutional appeal in this particular case in view of the length of the proceedings before the Constitutional Court   03/07/2023 10/07/2023 1,000 30   55211/22 17/11/2022 Miroslav ŽIVANKOV 1976 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic decisions - effectiveness of the constitutional appeal in this particular case in view of the length of the proceedings before the Constitutional Court   03/07/2023 10/07/2023 1,000 30   55218/22 17/11/2022 Vladanka ZEC 1963 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic decisions - effectiveness of the constitutional appeal in this particular case in view of the length of the proceedings before the Constitutional Court   03/07/2023 10/07/2023 1,000 30   55221/22 17/11/2022 Dušan POPOV 1953 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic decisions - effectiveness of the constitutional appeal in this particular case in view of the length of the proceedings before the Constitutional Court   03/07/2023 10/07/2023 1,000 30   55224/22 17/11/2022 Nenad BARAČKOV 1959 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic decisions - effectiveness of the constitutional appeal in this particular case in view of the length of the proceedings before the Constitutional Court   03/07/2023 10/07/2023 1,000 30   55252/22 17/11/2022 Dragan VUČIĆ 1973 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic decisions - effectiveness of the constitutional appeal in this particular case in view of the length of the proceedings before the Constitutional Court   03/07/2023 10/07/2023 1,000 30   55255/22 17/11/2022 Zlatibor STOJANOVIĆ 1955 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic decisions - effectiveness of the constitutional appeal in this particular case in view of the length of the proceedings before the Constitutional Court   03/07/2023 10/07/2023 1,000 30   55256/22 17/11/2022 Aleksandra POPOVIĆ 1955 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic decisions - effectiveness of the constitutional appeal in this particular case in view of the length of the proceedings before the Constitutional Court   03/07/2023 10/07/2023 1,000 30   55260/22 17/11/2022 Dragan MIĆIĆ 1963 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic decisions - effectiveness of the constitutional appeal in this particular case in view of the length of the proceedings before the Constitutional Court   03/07/2023 10/07/2023 1,000 30   55266/22 17/11/2022 Đuro PUCAR 1948 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic decisions - effectiveness of the constitutional appeal in this particular case in view of the length of the proceedings before the Constitutional Court   03/07/2023 10/07/2023 1,000 30   55271/22 17/11/2022 Velibor MILOVIĆ 1961 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic decisions - effectiveness of the constitutional appeal in this particular case in view of the length of the proceedings before the Constitutional Court   03/07/2023 10/07/2023 1,000 30   55274/22 17/11/2022 Zoran BOGOJEVIĆ 1966 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic decisions - effectiveness of the constitutional appeal in this particular case in view of the length of the proceedings before the Constitutional Court   03/07/2023 10/07/2023 1,000 30   55278/22 17/11/2022 Zoran UČUR 1961 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic decisions - effectiveness of the constitutional appeal in this particular case in view of the length of the proceedings before the Constitutional Court   03/07/2023 10/07/2023 1,000 30   55294/22 17/11/2022 Dragan DIKIĆ 1955 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic decisions - effectiveness of the constitutional appeal in this particular case in view of the length of the proceedings before the Constitutional Court   03/07/2023 10/07/2023 1,000 30   55298/22 17/11/2022 Dragan NIKOLČIĆ 1945 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic decisions - effectiveness of the constitutional appeal in this particular case in view of the length of the proceedings before the Constitutional Court   03/07/2023 10/07/2023 1,000 30   55302/22 17/11/2022 Dušanka NIKOLIĆ 1951 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic decisions - effectiveness of the constitutional appeal in this particular case in view of the length of the proceedings before the Constitutional Court   03/07/2023 10/07/2023 1,000 30   55311/22 17/11/2022 Nada GRGIĆ 1957 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic decisions - effectiveness of the constitutional appeal in this particular case in view of the length of the proceedings before the Constitutional Court   03/07/2023 10/07/2023 1,000 30   [1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants. 2 Less any amounts which may have already been paid in that regard at the domestic level. 3 Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.