CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 12 octobre 2023

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4598CDF { width:70.9pt; display:inline-block } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .s4EC3C151 { width:116.76pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s598389FB { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s75A32C27 { border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s598389F9 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:12pt } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2E932ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:11pt } .s598389F8 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold }   FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 56280/21 Paola MAZZARIOL against Italy and 12 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 12   October   2023 as a Committee composed of:   Krzysztof Wojtyczek , President ,   Lətif Hüseynov,   Ivana Jelić , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of the applicants is set out in the appendix. The applicants were represented by N. Zampieri, a lawyer practising in Schio. The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 of the Convention and under Article   1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention concerning the application of retrospective legislation (Article 1 § 218 of Law no. 266/2005 of 23   December 2005) to pending national proceedings were communicated to the Italian Government (“the Government”). In the communication the Registry requested the applicants to produce certain documents essential to processing of the application. No reply was received. By letter dated 1 August 2023, sent via the Court’s Electronic Communication Service (eComms), the applicants were notified that the period allowed for submission of the requested documents had expired and that no extension of time had been requested. Nevertheless, the Registry extended the time-limit for submission of the requested documents to 1   September 2023. The applicants’ attention was drawn to Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. The applicants received the letter of 1 August 2023 on the same day. However, no response has followed. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. In the light of the foregoing, and in the absence of any special circumstances regarding respect for the rights guaranteed by the Convention and the Protocols thereto, the Court, in accordance with Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention, considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the applications. Accordingly, the applications should be struck out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 16 November 2023.     Viktoriya Maradudina   Krzysztof Wojtyczek   Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX   List of applications raising complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (legislative interference)   No. Application no. Date of introduction Case name Applicant Year of Birth 1. 56280/21 11/11/2021 Mazzariol v. Italy Paola MAZZARIOL 1961 2. 57592/21 18/11/2021 Visentini v. Italy Gianluigi VISENTINI 1955 3. 58911/21 23/11/2021 Zuccon v. Italy Martina ZUCCON 1971 4. 59001/21 23/11/2021 Milione v. Italy Adelina MILIONE 1958 5. 60906/21 02/12/2021 Corra’ v. Italy Fiorenzo CORRA’ 1952 6. 2290/22 23/12/2021 Viale v. Italy Marisa VIALE 1961 7. 10348/22 11/02/2022 Novelli v. Italy Flavio NOVELLI 1945 8. 24663/22 28/04/2022 Manente v. Italy Manente MANENTE 1967 9. 24708/22 28/04/2022 Dall’Armellina v. Italy Roberto DALL’ARMELLINA 1951 10. 25497/22 28/04/2022 Bruscato v. Italy Donatella BRUSCATO 1975 11. 26040/22 12/05/2022 Campanella v. Italy Angelo CAMPANELLA 1948 12. 26042/22 16/05/2022 Boscolo Cucco v. Italy Massimo BOSCOLO CUCCO 1970 13. 26796/22 16/05/2022 Giacometti v. Italy Chiara GIACOMETTI 1943