CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 9 novembre 2023

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4598CDF { width:70.9pt; display:inline-block } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .s8D17D8A5 { width:127.42pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s42E65D7A { height:27.75pt }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 15543/18 Constantin-Cristian POROJAN against Romania and 13 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 9   November 2023 as a Committee composed of:   Faris Vehabović , President ,   Anja Seibert-Fohr,   Anne Louise Bormann , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of the applicants is set out in the appendix. The applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Romanian Government, who submitted observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicants, who were invited to submit their own observations (see the appended table for the relevant dates). No reply was received by the Court. By letters sent by registered post, the applicants were notified that the time allowed for the submission of their observations had expired (see the appended table for the relevant dates). The applicants’ attention was further drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. No reply to these letters has been received by the Court (see details in the appended table) and there are no previous letters from the applicants informing the Court about a change of address. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. In the light of the foregoing, the Court concludes that the applicants may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue the applications (Article 37 § 1   (a) of the Convention). Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in   fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto which require the continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 30 November 2023.     Viktoriya Maradudina   Faris Vehabović   Acting Deputy Registrar   President   APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article   3 of the Convention (inadequate conditions of detention) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Representative’s name and location Date of the applicant’s last letter to the Court Date of sending Government’s observations to the applicant Time-limit for submission of response by the applicant Date of the Court’s registered letter Date of receipt/return of the registered letter Date of release       15543/18 25/04/2018 Constantin-Cristian POROJAN 1980     27/09/2022 21/02/2023 04/04/2023 23/05/2023 31/05/2023 Signed for receipt by the applicant’s mother 14/05/2019     10797/19 15/02/2019 Terje Dunér GIAEVER 1955     15/07/2021 14/02/2023 28/03/2023 22/05/2023 14/07/2023 Returned to sender from Norway as “insufficient address” Returned to sender from Giurgiu Prison as “released” 28/03/2022     55477/19 15/11/2019 Tudorel BĂLĂUROIU 1987     10/05/2022 21/02/2023 04/04/2023 23/05/2023 06/06/2023 Signed for receipt by the applicant’s mother 28/01/2020     5015/20 21/08/2020 Alin PERCA 1977     08/11/2021 14/02/2023 28/03/2023 22/05/2023 11/07/2023 Returned to sender as “moved” from the applicant’s home address 17/08/2022     15003/20 24/07/2020 Neculai MITREA 1998     19/11/2020 14/02/2023 28/03/2023 22/05/2023 06/06/2023 Signed for receipt by the applicant 30/04/2022     15078/20 19/08/2020 Daniel-Cătălin STIOP 1992     19/08/2020 14/02/2023 28/03/2023 22/05/2023 07/06/2023 Signed for receipt by the Baia Mare Prison representative     08/06/2023 Signed for receipt by the applicant’s sister In detention in Baia Mare Prison according to the Government’s observations of 16/01/2023     21546/20 25/08/2020 Marius IVAN 1975       13/01/2023 21/02/2023 04/04/2023 23/05/2023 31/05/2023 Signed for receipt by the applicant’s daughter 09/06/2021     21803/20 20/08/2020 Gigi MANOLE 1978     05/01/2021 21/02/2023 04/04/2023 23/05/2023 20/06/2023 Illegible signature 15/12/2020     23921/20 15/09/2020 Silviu-Constantin POPA 1982     04/01/2023 21/02/2023 04/04/2023 23/05/2023 09/06/2023 Signed for receipt by a relative of the applicant 10/03/2021   35123/20 14/10/2020 Adrian LINGURAR 1982     04/01/2021 05/04/2023 17/05/2023 06/06/2023 27/07/2023 Returned to sender as “unclaimed” 05/10/2020   38018/20 29/09/2020 Nicolae BODOR 1982 Ernest Bodor Târgu Mureș 04/01/2021 05/04/2023 17/05/2023 06/06/2023 14/06/2023 Signed for receipt by the representative’s wife 28/11/2020   38509/20 21/09/2020 Ilie GHIGEANU 1982     04/01/2021 05/04/2023 17/05/2023 06/06/2023 13/06/2023 Signed for receipt by the applicant’s brother 15/12/2020   40708/20 08/10/2020 Viorel OBREJA 1977     01/02/2023 05/04/2023 17/05/2023 06/06/2023 24/07/2023 Returned to sender as “unclaimed” 02/01/2021   49483/20 07/12/2020 Florin NICOLAICĂ 1975     22/03/2021 05/04/2023 17/05/2023 06/06/2023 14/06/2023 Signed for receipt by a relative of the applicant 26/12/2020