CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 9 novembre 2023

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4598CDF { width:70.9pt; display:inline-block } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .s8D17D8A5 { width:127.42pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 73418/17 Adrian MIHALCIUC against Romania and 16 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 9   November 2023 as a Committee composed of:   Faris Vehabović , President ,   Anja Seibert-Fohr,   Anne Louise Bormann , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of the applicants is set out in the appendix. The applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Romanian Government, who submitted observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicants, who were invited to submit their own observations (see the appended table for the relevant dates). No reply was received by the Court. By letters sent by registered post, the applicants were notified that the time allowed for the submission of their observations had expired (see the appended table for the relevant dates). The applicants’ attention was further drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. The registered letters either were received by the applicants, or were returned to the Court (see details in the appended table). There are no previous letters from the applicants informing the Court about a change of address. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. In the light of the foregoing, the Court concludes that the applicants may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue the applications (Article 37 § 1   (a) of the Convention). Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in   fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto which require the continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 30 November 2023.     Viktoriya Maradudina   Faris Vehabović   Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article   3 of the Convention (inadequate conditions of detention) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Representative’s name and location Date of the applicant’s last letter to the Court Date of sending Government’s observations to the applicant Time-limit for submission of response by the applicant Date of the Court’s registered letter Date of receipt / return of the registered letter     73418/17 04/10/2017 Adrian MIHALCIUC 1977 Stelică Boboc Iasi 24/06/2022 31/08/2022 12/10/2022 06/12/2022 21/12/2022     27416/18 09/07/2018 Laurențiu DUMA 1977     24/09/2020 21/03/2023 02/05/2023 13/06/2023 22/06/2023     37982/18 03/08/2018 Cristian-Ionuț MARIN 1989 Lucian Stuparu Craiova 08/02/2023 20/03/2023 02/05/2023 13/06/2023 21/06/2023     52663/18 01/11/2018 Emil-Gavril POP 1970 Sorin Tomele Oradea 16/01/2023 20/03/2023 02/05/2023 13/06/2023 22/06/2023     21942/20 29/06/2020 Adrian-Ionel JÎTEA 1969     29/06/2020 28/03/2023 09/05/2023 19/06/2023 Returned as “unclaimed” on 16/08/2023     37603/20 21/09/2020 Robert MIHAI 1981     20/02/2023 21/03/2023 02/05/2023 13/06/2023 21/06/2023     38499/20 15/10/2020 Alexandru MIHAILOV 1992     15/10/2020 21/03/2023 02/05/2023 13/06/2023 Returned as “recipient unknown” on 16/08/2023     45659/20 22/02/2021 Adrian GHENEA 1996     21/04/2021 21/03/2023 02/05/2023 13/06/2023 26/06/2023     45676/20 18/11/2020 Bogdan Dumitru RUSU 1981 Daniela Tapu Tomesti 25/01/2021 05/04/2023 17/05/2023 23/06/2023 30/06/2023   47185/20 05/10/2020 Gheorghe Teofil SPIRIDON 1991     25/11/2020 05/04/2023 17/05/2023 23/06/2023 Returned as “recipient moved from address” on 27/07/2023   47851/20 25/02/2021 Vasile-Bogdănel MAROȘAN 1997     03/03/2021 21/03/2023 02/05/2023 13/06/2023 28/06/2023   47876/20 02/12/2020 Adrian Fane SANDU 1987     05/04/2023 28/03/2023 09/05/2023 19/06/2023 12/07/2023   48505/20 05/01/2021 Valentin-Gigel BRAGADIRU 1983     05/01/2021 05/04/2023 17/05/2023 23/06/2023 Returned as “unclaimed” on 27/07/2023   49107/20 22/10/2020 Dumitru-Ioan HORGA 1968 Nicoleta Sânzeana Horga Lazuri 22/10/2020 05/04/2023 17/05/2023 23/06/2023 03/07/2023   50977/20 28/01/2021 Marian NASTASE 1978     28/01/2021 05/04/2023 17/05/2023 23/06/2023 30/06/2023   51945/20 30/12/2020 Marius GĂNUȚĂ 1988     14/04/2021 05/04/2023 17/05/2023 23/06/2023 03/07/2023   55423/20 28/05/2021 Levente BISI 1985     13/07/2021 05/04/2023 17/05/2023 23/06/2023 Returned as “unclaimed” on 16/08/2023