CEDH · CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG — 7 décembre 2023

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s82B4DA5F { page-break-before:right; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .sDECD9755 { margin-left:11.67pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:6.78pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .sDA7B489D { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:15pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:3.45pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s5C5C410E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:18.34pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:0.11pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s67CAFE05 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:18.45pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s7C22C014 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:16.34pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:2.11pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .sD11CFAB7 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:15.01pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify; padding-left:1.99pt; font-family:Arial } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .sD58C010 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:15.01pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:1.99pt; font-family:Arial } .sBB6E85D0 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:34pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-17pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sE5BF05B1 { width:2.33pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4598CDF { width:70.9pt; display:inline-block } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .sD046859D { width:101.74pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .sCC22C24E { font-family:Arial; color:#3e3e3e } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s2F3EB0E4 { border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sE1A7A04C { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#424242 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sAB95A5CB { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#424242 } .sBAADFE8C { border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .sD39EF07F { height:94.65pt } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .sA4BC3E2E { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }       SECOND SECTION CASE OF NADAREYSHVILI AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 41853/21 and 32 others – see appended list)           JUDGMENT         STRASBOURG 7 December 2023 This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Nadareyshvili and Others v. Russia, The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Lorraine Schembri Orland , President ,   Frédéric Krenc,   Davor Derenčinović , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 16 November 2023, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.     The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article   34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table. 2.     The applicants were represented by Memorial Human Rights Centre, an organisation based in Moscow at the time. 3.     The Russian Government (“the   Government”) were given notice of the applications. THE FACTS 4.     The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table. 5.     The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of nationwide protests in support of jailed opposition leader Aleksey Navalnyy. They also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention. THE LAW JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 6.     Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment. JURISDICTION 7.     The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos.   40792/10 and 2   others, §§   68 ‑ 73, 17   January 2023). ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE   11 OF THE CONVENTION 8.     The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article   11 of the Convention. 9.     The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see Kudrevičius and Others v.   Lithuania [GC], no.   37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v.   Turkey , no.   74552/01, ECHR 2006 ‑ XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v.   Moldova , no.   33482/06, 31   March 2009). 10.     In the leading cases of Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014, and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 11 .     Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicants’ freedom of assembly were not “necessary in a democratic society”. 12.     These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention. OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW 13.     Some applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention and its Protocols, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible. 14 .     Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that these complaints also disclose violations of the Convention and its Protocols in the light of its findings in Butkevich v. Russia , no.   5865/07, §§   63-65, 13   February 2018, Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia , nos.   54381/08 and 5   others, §§ 115-31, 10 April 2018, and Korneyeva v.   Russia , no.   72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v. Russia , no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (CAO); Martynyuk v.   Russia , no.   13764/15, §§ 38-42, 8   October 2019, relating to the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal against the sentence of administrative detention; and Tomov and Others v. Russia , nos.   18255/10 and 5 others, §§ 123-28, 9 April 2019, concerning poor conditions of transfer in police vans. REMAINING COMPLAINTS 15.     Some applicants raised further additional complaints under Article 6 of the Convention concerning other aspects of fairness of the administrative ‑ offence proceedings. In view of the findings in paragraphs 11 and 14 above, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 16.     Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case ‑ law (see in particular Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos.   25809/17 and 14 others, §   22, 4   October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table. FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY, Decides to join the applications; Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with the applicants’ complaints as they relate to facts that took place before 16 September 2022; Declares the complaints under Article 11 of the Convention and the other complaints under the well-established case-law of the Court, as set out in the appended table, admissible, and finds that there is no need to examine separately the remaining complaints under Article 6 of the Convention; Holds that these complaints disclose a breach of Article   11 of the Convention; Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention and the Protocols thereto as regards the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table); Holds (a)   that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement; (b)   that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. Done in English, and notified in writing on 7 December 2023, pursuant to Rule   77   §§   2 and   3 of the Rules of Court.     Viktoriya Maradudina   Lorraine Schembri Orland   Acting Deputy Registrar   President     APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention (disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Name of the public event Location Date Administrative charges Penalty Final domestic decision Court Name Date Other complaints under well-established case-law Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage per applicant (in euros) [1]     41853/21 02/08/2021 Anton Sergeyevich NADAREYSHVILI 1992 Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO detention for 10   days Moscow City Court 05/02/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 3.05 p.m. on 31/01/2021 and 7.50 p.m. on 01/02/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. 5,000     41855/21 02/08/2021 Grigoriy Valentinovich TURINTSEV 1980 Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow   02/02/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO detention for 10   days Moscow City Court 09/02/2021 Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - poor conditions of transfer in a police van on 02/02/2021 (overcrowding (22   people in the van), inadequate temperature);   Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 11:45 p.m. on 02/02/2021 and 6:30 p.m. on 03/02/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.   5,000     42088/21 04/08/2021 Artem Vladimirovich ALBUTOV 1990 Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO detention for 8   days Moscow City Court 24/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 3   p.m. on 31/01/2021 and 8 p.m. on 01/02/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. 5,000     42093/21 04/08/2021 Vitaliy Borisovich RAZORENOV 1989 Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO detention for 12   days Moscow City Court 05/02/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 3   p.m. on 31/01/2021 and 12:30 p.m. on 01/02/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. 5,000     42094/21 04/08/2021 Anastasiya Aleksandrovna PISKUN 1995 Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO detention for 7   days Moscow City Court 04/02/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 2.40 p.m. on 31/01/2021 and 7.50 p.m. on 01/02/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.       5,000     42097/21 04/08/2021 Sergey Aleksandrovich LUSHCHIK 1996 Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow   02/02/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO detention for 10   days Moscow City Court 26/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 11.50 p.m. on 02/02/2021 and noon on 03/02/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. 5,000     42292/21 04/08/2021 Vyacheslav Yuryevich GRICHKOV 1997 Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO detention for 8   days Moscow City Court 16/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 1.40 p.m. on 31/01/2021 and 8.05 p.m. on 01/02/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. 5,000     42311/21 04/08/2021 Dmitriy Nikolayevich DANDYKIN 1992 Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO detention for 13   days Moscow City Court 08/02/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 1.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021 and 5 p.m. on 01/02/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.   5,000     43753/21 26/08/2021 Darya Vladimirovna SUKHOVA 1995 Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow   23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   20,000 Moscow City Court 02/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 3.19 p.m. and 11.58 p.m. on 23/01/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.   4,000   43790/21 26/08/2021 Artur Vladimirovich KIUSHKIN 1998 Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Saransk   21/04/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Supreme Court of the Republic of Chuvashia 04/06/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station between 8.10 p.m. on 21/04/2021 and 1.30 a.m. on 22/04/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   43796/21 26/08/2021 Filipp Antonovich FORTUNKOV 1990 Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO fine of RUB   20,000 Moscow City Court 30/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 4.14 p.m. on 31/01/2021 and 5.30 p.m. on 02/02/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   43805/21 26/08/2021 Raushaniya Ilgizovna STEGLENKO 1983 Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Magnitogorsk   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   13,000 Chelyabinsk Regional Court 31/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record between 1.05 p.m. and 4.15 p.m. on 31/01/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   43815/21 26/08/2021 Dmitriy Andreyevich LYSKOV 1982 Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Beryozniki   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Perm Regional Court 22/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record between 12.15 p.m. and 3.30   p.m. on 31/01/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   43828/21 26/08/2021 Kseniya Alekseyevna UYMANOVA 2000 Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Vladivostok   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Primorye Regional Court 15/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 12.05   p.m. and 7 p.m. on 31/01/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   43850/21 10/08/2021 Leonid Mikhaylovich SHEKHTMAN 1995 Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO detention for 7 days Moscow City Court 10/02/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 12.40   p.m. on 31/01/2021 and 4.37 p.m. on 01/02/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. 5,000   43859/21 10/08/2021 Yegor Alekseyevich BALYKO 1997 Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO detention for 12 days Moscow City Court 04/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 5.50 p.m. on 31/01/2021 and 8.30 p.m. on 01/02/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. 5,000   43861/21 10/08/2021 Yevgeniy Sergeyevich BARABASH 1995 Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO detention for 15 days Moscow City Court 10/02/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 5.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021 and 3.20 p.m. on 01/02/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. 5,000   44002/21 30/08/2021 Aleksandr Sergeyevich POPKOVICH 1997 Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO detention for 10 days Moscow City Court 02/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 6.15 p.m. on 31/01/2021 and 6 p.m. on 01/02/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. 5,000   44093/21 30/08/2021 Dmitriy Anatolyevich YEPISHCHEV 1987 Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow   23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000 Moscow City Court 12/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 2.30 p.m. on 23/01/2021 and 12.20 a.m. on 24/01/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   44100/21 30/08/2021 Irina Vasilyevna ORESHKINA 1977 Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Moscow City Court 12/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 4.40 p.m. and 11.20 p.m. on 31/01/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   47174/21 07/09/2021 Marina Sergeyevna KLIVETSKAYA 1975 Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Omsk   23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Omsk Regional Court 06/04/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.     3,500   47202/21 16/09/2021 Yuliya Vladimirovna REZNIKOVA 1972   To CHECK Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Taganrog   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Rostov Regional Court 17/03/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 3,500   47227/21 16/09/2021 Yevgeniy Viktorovich LIDZHIYEV 1991 Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO detention for 8 days Moscow City Court 16/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record on 31/01/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 5,000   47229/21 16/09/2021 Petr Alekseyevich STRYAKHNIN 1997 Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000 Moscow City Court 17/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 1.30 p.m. and 9.10 p.m. on 31/01/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   48036/21 09/09/2021 Yefim Ilyich MATUSHKIN 2001 Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow   02/02/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   20,000 Moscow City Court 10/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between noon on 02/02/2021 and 1 a.m. on 03/02/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   48104/21 09/09/2021 Yakov Mikhaylovich PODMAREV 2002 Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow   02/02/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   20,000 Moscow City Court 10/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 11   a.m. on 02/02/2021 and midnight on 03/02/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   48155/21 24/09/2021 Kirill Olegovich SAVCHENKOV 1987 Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000 Moscow City Court 19/05/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 3.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021 and 12.03 a.m. on 01/02/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   48158/21 24/09/2021 Aleksandra Aleksandrovna SAZONOVA 1996 Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow   23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   20,000 Moscow City Court 02/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 3.30 p.m. on 23/01/2021 and noon on 24/01/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   48172/21 24/09/2021 Gennadiy Alekseyevich STEPANCHIKOV 1973 Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000 Moscow City Court 06/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 2.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021 and midnight on 02/02/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   48195/21 24/09/2021 Aleksandr Sergeyevich OSIN 1997 Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow   02/02/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Moscow City Court 02/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 11.30   p.m. on 02/02/2021 and 3 p.m. on 03/02/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   48197/21 24/09/2021 Yevgeniy Olegovich ZHIDILEV 1990 Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow   02/02/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000 Moscow City Court 12/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 11.30   p.m. on 02/02/2021 and 5 a.m. on 03/02/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   48206/21 24/09/2021 Vlada Yuryevna AKHMANOVA 2001 Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Cheboksary   23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Supreme Court of the Republic of Chuvashia 30/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record on 23/01/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   48215/21 24/09/2021 Yekaterina Valeryevna BABUTSKAYA 1993 Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Taganrog   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Rostov Regional Court 29/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record between 11.15 a.m. and 5.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000     [1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.