CEDH · CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG — 7 décembre 2023

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s82B4DA5F { page-break-before:right; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .sDECD9755 { margin-left:11.67pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:6.78pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .sDA7B489D { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:15pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:3.45pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s5C5C410E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:18.34pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:0.11pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s67CAFE05 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:18.45pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s7C22C014 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:16.34pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:2.11pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .sD11CFAB7 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:15.01pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify; padding-left:1.99pt; font-family:Arial } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .sD58C010 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:15.01pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:1.99pt; font-family:Arial } .sBB6E85D0 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:34pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-17pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sE5BF05B1 { width:2.33pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4598CDF { width:70.9pt; display:inline-block } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .sD046859D { width:101.74pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .sCC22C24E { font-family:Arial; color:#3e3e3e } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s2F3EB0E4 { border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sE1A7A04C { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#424242 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sAB95A5CB { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#424242 } .sBAADFE8C { border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s946186CF { height:1.1pt } .s7A72F38 { height:31pt } .s580FC71E { height:0.95pt } .s742E78A { height:10.3pt } .s17DE2762 { height:98.6pt } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sA4BC3E2E { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }       SECOND SECTION CASE OF FROLOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 44292/18 and 41 others – see appended list)           JUDGMENT         STRASBOURG 7 December 2023 This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Frolova and Others v. Russia, The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Lorraine Schembri Orland , President ,   Frédéric Krenc,   Davor Derenčinović , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 16 November 2023, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.     The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article   34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table. 2.     The Russian Government (“the   Government”) were given notice of the applications. THE FACTS 3.     The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table. 4.     The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention. THE LAW JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 5.     Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment. JURISDICTION 6.     The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos.   40792/10 and 2   others, §§   68 ‑ 73, 17   January 2023). ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE   11 OF THE CONVENTION 7.     The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article   11 of the Convention. 8.     The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see Kudrevičius and Others v.   Lithuania [GC], no.   37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v.   Turkey , no.   74552/01, ECHR 2006 ‑ XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v.   Moldova , no.   33482/06, 31   March 2009). 9.     In the leading cases of Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014 and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 10.     Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicants’ freedom of assembly were not “necessary in a democratic society”. 11 .     These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention. OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW 12.     Some applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention and its Protocols, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible. 13 .     Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that these complaints also disclose violations of the Convention and its Protocols in the light of its findings in Butkevich v. Russia , no.   5865/07, §§   63-65, 13   February 2018, Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia , nos.   54381/08 and 5   others, §§ 115-31, 10 April 2018, and Korneyeva v.   Russia , no.   72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v. Russia , no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (the CAO); Martynyuk v.   Russia , no.   13764/15, §§ 38-42, 8 October 2019, relating to the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal against the sentence of administrative detention; and Korneyeva , cited above, §§ 62-65 as to the right of the organisers or participants of public assemblies not to be tried and punished twice for the same offence. REMAINING COMPLAINTS 14.     Some applicants raised further additional complaints under the Convention or Protocols thereto. In view of the findings in paragraphs 11 and 13 above, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 15.     Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case ‑ law (see in particular Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos.   25809/17 and 14 others, §   22, 4   October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table. FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY, Decides to join the applications; Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with the applicants’ complaints as they relate to facts that took place before 16 September 2022; Declares the complaints under Article 11 of the Convention and the other complaints under the well-established case-law of the Court, as set out in the appended table, admissible, and finds that there is no need to examine separately the remaining complaints; Holds that these complaints disclose a breach of Article   11 of the Convention; Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention and the Protocols thereto as regards the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table); Holds (a)   that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement; (b)   that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. Done in English, and notified in writing on 7 December 2023, pursuant to Rule   77   §§   2 and   3 of the Rules of Court.     Viktoriya Maradudina   Lorraine Schembri Orland   Acting Deputy Registrar   President     APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention (disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Representative’s name and location Name of the public event Location Date Administrative offence Penalty Final domestic decision Court Name Date Other complaints under well-established case-law Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage per applicant (in euros) [1]     44292/18 30/07/2018 Tatyana Ivanovna FROLOVA 1949 Sivoldayev Ilya Vladimirovich Voronezh Political protest   Voronezh, 07/10/2017 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   5,000   Voronezh Regional Court 30/01/2018 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 3,500     1492/19 14/12/2018 Marina Aleksandrovna POLYTOVA 1998 Glukhov Aleksey Vladimirovich Novocheboksarsk Anticorruption rally   Cheboksary, 05/05/2018       article 19.3 § 1 of CAO         article 20.2 § 2 of CAO         article 20.2 § 2 of CAO fine of RUB   600         30 hours of community work       30 hours of community work Supreme Court of the Chuvashia Republic 15/07/2018   Supreme Court of the Chuvashia Republic 26/07/2018   Supreme Court of the Chuvashia Republic 26/07/2018 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings under Art. 20.2 of CAO     3,500     1504/19 14/12/2018 Ilya Vyacheslavovich YAKOVLEV 1982 Glukhov Aleksey Vladimirovich Novocheboksarsk Anticorruption rally   Cheboksary, 05/05/2018 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO         article 20.2 § 5 of CAO 20 hours of community work       20 hours of community work Supreme Court of the Chuvashia Republic 26/07/2018   Supreme Court of the Chuvashia Republic 26/07/2018 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings 3,500     1609/19 19/12/2018 Anton Alekseyevich MAMKIN 1989 Gaynutdinov Damir Ravilevich Kazan Opposition rally   St Petersburg, 05/05/2018 article 19.3 § 1 of CAO     article   20.2 § 5 of CAO 7 days of detention     fine of RUB   15,000 St Petersburg City Court 19/06/2018   St Petersburg City Court 19/06/2018 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 05/05/2018 escorting to a police station for compiling an offence report,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of detention was executed immediately, an appeal against conviction had no suspensive effect,   Prot. 7 Art. 4 - right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings – the applicant was convicted under Art.   19.3 and Art. 20.2 of CAO, in separate proceedings, for substantially the same facts relating to his participation in the rally on 05/05/2018 5,000     15865/19 11/03/2019 Nataliya Dmitriyevna VOZNESENSKAYA 1966 Mezak Ernest Aleksandrovich Saint-Barthélemy-d’Anjou Opposition rally   St Petersburg, 01/05/2018 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 St Petersburg City Court 11/09/2018 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 01/05/2018 escorting to a police station for compiling an offence report,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000     24461/19 16/04/2019 Grigoriy Sergeyevich GANDLEVSKIY 1986 Kiselyov Roman Denisovich Moscow Leafleting to support O.   Sentsov   Moscow, 18/06/2018 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   20,000 Moscow City Court 16/10/2018 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 18/06/2018 escorting to a police station for compiling an offence report,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000     28537/19 12/05/2019 Mariya Aleksandrovna MENSHIKOVA 1994 Laptev Aleksey Nikolayevich Moscow Opposition rally   Moscow, 05/05/2018 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO     article   19.3 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000     fine of RUB 1,000 Moscow City Court 12/11/2018   Moscow City Court 28/11/2018 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 05 ‑ 06/05/2018 escorting to and detention in a police office for compiling the offence reports,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Art. 20.2 § 5 of CAO,   Prot. 7 Art. 4 - right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings - final decisions - 12/11/2018 and 28/11/2018, Moscow City Court; Art. 19.3 of CAO and Art. 20.2 of CAO; overlap of the facts constituting the basis for the applicant’s prosecution in the second set of proceedings with substantially the same facts underlying her conviction in the first set of proceedings 4,000     29719/19 28/05/2019 Alisa Yaroslavovna SAFINA 1996 Kiselyov Roman Denisovich Moscow Leafleting to support O.   Sentsov   Moscow, 18/06/2018 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   20,000 Moscow City Court 28/11/2018 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 18/06/2018 escorting to a police station for compiling an offence report,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000     36536/19 24/06/2019 Aleksey Anatolyevich KHODAKOV 1987 Markin Konstantin Aleksandrovich Velikiy Novgorod Opposition rally   Moscow, 05/05/2018 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000 Moscow City Court 18/03/2019 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 05 ‑ 07/05/2018 escorting to and detention in a police station for and after compiling an offence report,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   37287/19 24/06/2019 Yegor Mikhaylovich AGAFONOV 1997 Zakhvatov Dmitriy Igorevich Moscow Rally against the isolation of the Russian segments of the Internet   Moscow, 10/03/2019 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Moscow City Court 18/04/2019 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 10/03/2019 escorting to a police station for compiling an offence report,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   42656/19 30/07/2019 Ivan Mikhaylovich ABRAMOV 1985 Yelanchik Oleg Aleksandrovich Moscow Rally against the pension reform   Moscow, 06/10/2018 article 19.3 § 1 of CAO       article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO               fine of RUB   1,000       fine of RUB   20,000               Moscow City Court 30/01/2019     Moscow City Court 06/02/2019             Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 06-08/10/2018 escorting to and detention in a police station for and after compiling offence reports,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Art. 20.2 of CAO,   Prot. 7 Art. 4 - right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings - Continued prosecution under Art. 20.2 of CAO after the appeal decision on the charge under Art. 19.3 of CAO, for the substantially same facts 4,000   43554/19 06/08/2019 Aleksey Yuryevich TARASOV 1984 Zubarev Dmitriy Vladimirovich Vladivostok Rally for free elections   Vladivostok, 28/01/2018     Rally to support A.   Navalnyy   Vladivostok, 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO           article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000           fine of RUB   15,000 Primorye Regional Court 13/02/2019         Primorye Regional Court 01/06/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 27/02/2018 and 31/01/2021 escorting to a police station for compiling offence reports,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in two sets administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   46322/19 20/08/2019 Yelena Sergeyevna KALININA 1967 Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich Kazan A “hybrid” rally against construction of waste incineration plant   Arkhangelsk, 07/04/2019 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO       article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   16,000       fine of RUB   16,000 Arkhangelsk Regional Court 07/05/2019     Arkhangelsk Regional Court 07/05/2019 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings 3,500   46931/19 01/08/2019 Mikhail Alekseyevich SHAKLEIN 1996 Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich Kazan A “hybrid” rally against construction of waste incineration plant   Arkhangelsk, 07/04/2019 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO       article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   14,000       fine of RUB   12,000 Arkhangelsk Regional Court 14/05/2019     Arkhangelsk Regional Court 14/05/2019 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 15 ‑ 16/04/2019 escorting to and detention in a police station for compiling offence reports,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   47104/19 01/08/2019 Nikolay Alekseyevich GRIGORYEV 1983 Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich Kazan A “hybrid” rally against construction of waste incineration plant   Arkhangelsk, 07/04/2019 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO         article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   14,000         fine of RUB   12,000 Arkhangelsk Regional Court 28/05/2019       Arkhangelsk Regional Court 13/06/2019 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 19 ‑ 21/04/2019 escorting to and detention in a police station for and after compiling offence reports in relation to the rally on 07/04/2019,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   47198/19 12/08/2019 Yekaterina Dmitriyevna TSVETKOVA 1985 Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich Kazan A “hybrid” rally against construction of waste incineration plant   Arkhangelsk, 07/04/2019 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO       article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   12,000       fine of RUB   12,000 Arkhangelsk Regional Court 23/05/2019     Arkhangelsk Regional Court 20/06/2019 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 20 ‑ 21/04/2019 escorting to and detention in a police station after compiling offence reports on 19/04/2019 in relation to the rally on 07/04/2019,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   48382/19 05/09/2019 Aleksey Borisovich GANICHEV 1978 Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich Kazan A “hybrid” rally against construction of waste incineration plant   Arkhangelsk, 07/04/2019 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO       article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO fine of RUB   11,000       fine of RUB   14,000 Arkhangelsk Regional Court 04/06/2019     Arkhangelsk Regional Court 04/06/2019 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 02 ‑ 04/05/2019 escorting to and detention in a police station for and after compiling offence reports in relation to the rally on 07/04/2019,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   48398/19 05/09/2019 Sergey Gennadyevich SYUKHIN 1981 Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich Kazan A “hybrid” rally against construction of waste incineration plant   Arkhangelsk, 07/04/2019 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO       article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000       fine of RUB   12,000 Arkhangelsk Regional Court 23/05/2019     Arkhangelsk Regional Court 23/05/2019 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 23 ‑ 24/04/2019 escorting to and detention in a police station for compiling an offence report,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   48420/19 05/09/2019 Grigoriy Sergeyevich BIYALT 1996 Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich Kazan A “hybrid” rally against construction of waste incineration plant   Arkhangelsk, 07/04/2019 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO       article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000       fine of RUB   13,000 Arkhangelsk Regional Court 16/05/2019     Arkhangelsk Regional Court 16/05/2019 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 14 ‑ 15/04/2019 escorting to and detention in a police station for compiling offence reports,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   48622/19 06/09/2019 Yevgeniy Yuryevich MOLOTOV 1981 Kurochko Yelena Viktorovna Vologda Anticorruption rally   Vologda, 14/10/2018     Rally to support A. Navalnyy   Vologda, 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 2 of CAO         article 20.2 § 2 of CAO fine of RUB   20,000         3 days of detention Vologda Regional Court 14/03/2019       Vologda Regional Court 11/03/2021   4,000   51013/19 19/09/2019 Yevgeniya Mikhaylovna TRUBKINA 1990 Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich Kazan A “hybrid” rally against construction of waste incineration plant   Arkhangelsk, 07/04/2019 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO       article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000       fine of RUB   11,000 Arkhangelsk Regional Court 23/05/2019     Arkhangelsk Regional Court 23/05/2019 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings 3,500   53329/19 18/09/2019 Mikhail Igorevich BARNA 1997 Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich Kazan A “hybrid” rally against construction of waste incineration plant   Arkhangelsk, 07/04/2019 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO       article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000       fine of RUB   13,000 Arkhangelsk Regional Court 16/05/2019     Arkhangelsk Regional Court 16/05/2019 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 14 ‑ 15/04/2019 escorting to and detention in a police station for compiling offence reports,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   53970/19 01/10/2019 Vyacheslav Vasilyevich KABANKOV 1980 Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich Kazan A “hybrid” rally against construction of waste incineration plant   Arkhangelsk, 07/04/2019 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO       article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   12,000       fine of RUB   11,000 Arkhangelsk Regional Court 20/06/2019     Arkhangelsk Regional Court 16/07/2019 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 19 ‑ 20/05/2019 escorting to and detention in a police station for compiling offence reports,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   54040/19 01/10/2019 Darya Dmitriyevna PORYADINA 2000 Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich Kazan A “hybrid” rally against construction of waste incineration plant   Arkhangelsk, 07/04/2019 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO       article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000       fine of RUB   13,000 Arkhangelsk Regional Court 16/05/2019     Arkhangelsk Regional Court 16/05/2019 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings 3,500   55802/19 10/10/2019 Darya Vasilyevna BOROVIKOVA 1991 Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich Kazan A “hybrid” rally against construction of waste incineration plant   Arkhangelsk, 07/04/2019 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO       article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   13,000       fine of RUB   11,000 Arkhangelsk Regional Court 25/06/2019     Arkhangelsk Regional Court 04/07/2019 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 19 ‑ 20/05/2019 escorting to and detention in a police station for compiling offence reports,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   55914/19 03/10/2019 Oksana Anatolyevna VLADYKA 1974 Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich Kazan A “hybrid” rally against construction of waste incineration plant   Arkhangelsk, 07/04/2019 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO       article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000       fine of RUB   15,000 Arkhangelsk Regional Court 21/05/2019     Arkhangelsk Regional Court 21/05/2019 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 11 ‑ 12/04/2019 escorting to and detention in a police station for compiling offence reports,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   56352/19 04/10/2019 Antonina Viktorovna OBEDNINA 1981 Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich Kazan A “hybrid” rally against construction of waste incineration plant   Arkhangelsk, 07/04/2019 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO       article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   14,000       fine of RUB   12,000 Arkhangelsk Regional Court 25/06/2019     Arkhangelsk Regional Court 25/06/2019 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 19 ‑ 20/05/2019 escorting to and detention in a police station for compiling offence reports,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   56362/19 11/10/2019 Arina Aleksandrovna SKLEMINA 2000 Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich Kazan A “hybrid” rally against construction of waste incineration plant   Arkhangelsk, 07/04/2019 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO       article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   12,000       fine of RUB   11,000 Arkhangelsk Regional Court 23/05/2019     Arkhangelsk Regional Court 23/05/2019 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings 3,500   59321/19 31/10/2019 Aleksandr Aleksandrovich TISHININ 1988 Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich Kazan A “hybrid” rally against construction of waste incineration plant   Arkhangelsk, 07/04/2019 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO       article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000       fine of RUB   15,000 Arkhangelsk Regional Court 04/06/2019     Arkhangelsk Regional Court 06/06/2019 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 04 ‑ 06/05/2019 escorting to and detention in a police station for and after compiling offence reports,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   59324/19 31/10/2019 Yuriy Yevgenyevich CHESNOKOV 1966 Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich Kazan A “hybrid” rally against construction of waste incineration plant   Arkhangelsk, 07/04/2019 article 20.2 § 1 of CAO       article 20.2 § 3 of CAO fine of RUB   16,000       90 hours of community work Arkhangelsk Regional Court 14/05/2019     Arkhangelsk Regional Court 14/05/2019 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings 3,500   59548/19 01/11/2019 Oleg Vladimirovich BOROVIKOV 1994 Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich Kazan A “hybrid” rally against construction of waste incineration plant   Arkhangelsk, 07/04/2019 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO         article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   12,000         fine of RUB   12,000 Arkhangelsk Regional Court 14/05/2019       Arkhangelsk Regional Court 14/05/2019 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings 3,500   61179/19 31/10/2019 Arseniy Vyacheslavovich KOSTENKO 1987 Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich Kazan A “hybrid” rally against construction of waste incineration plant   Arkhangelsk, 07/04/2019 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO       article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000       fine of RUB   13,000 Arkhangelsk Regional Court 23/05/2019     Arkhangelsk Regional Court 23/05/2019 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 18 ‑ 19/04/2019 escorting to and detention in a police station for and after compiling offence reports in relation to the rally on 07/04/2019,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   61735/19 12/11/2019 Oleg Vladimirovich LARIONOV 1952 Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich Kazan A “hybrid” rally against construction of waste incineration plant     Arkhangelsk, 07/04/2019 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO     article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   14,000     fine of RUB   14,000 Arkhangelsk Regional Court 16/05/2019   Arkhangelsk Regional Court 16/05/2019 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 08 ‑ 09/04/2019 escorting to and detention in a police station for and after compiling offence reports in relation to the rally on 07/04/2019,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   62431/19 20/11/2019 Yegor Olegovich MATOFANOV 2000 Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich Kazan A “hybrid” rally against construction of waste incineration plant     Arkhangelsk, 07/04/2019 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO   and   article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000 Arkhangelsk Regional Court 01/10/2019 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 3,500   16029/21 05/03/2021 Svetlana Borisovna DILMAN 1975 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally to support S.   Furgal   Komsomolsk-on-Amur, 29/07/2020 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO 20 hours of community work Khabarovsk Regional Court 25/11/2020   3,500   16043/21 05/03/2021 Mikhail Aleksandrovich BARANOV 1987 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally against constitutional amendments   Moscow, 15/07/2020       Rally to support A.   Navalnyy   Moscow, 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 8 of CAO               article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO fine of RUB   150,000               12 days of detention Moscow City Court 13/10/2020             Moscow City Court 08/02/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 15 ‑ 16/07/2020 and 31/01/2021-01/02/2021 escorting to and detention in a police station for and after compiling offence reports,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - immediate execution of the sentence of detention; an appeal against conviction had no suspensive effect 6,500   16305/21 04/03/2021 Roman Dmitriyevich PICHUZHIN 1977 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally for fair elections to Mosgorduma   Moscow, 03/08/2019       Rally to support A.   Navalnyy   Moscow, 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO               article 20.2 § 8 of CAO fine of RUB   20,000               30 days of detention Moscow City Court 04/09/2020             Moscow City Court 09/02/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 03 ‑ 04/08/2019 and 31/01/2021-01/02/2021 escorting to and detention in a police station for compiling offence reports,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of detention was executed immediately; an appeal against conviction had no suspensive effect 5,000   19041/21 26/03/2021 Yelena Aleksandrovna GORSKAYA 1998 Pryanishnikov Aleksey Aleksandrovich Tomsk Rally to support A.   Navalnyy   Moscow, 02/02/2021 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO 10 days of detention Moscow City Court 08/02/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 03/02/2021 escorting to and detention in a police station for and after compiling an offence report,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 5,000   19090/21 26/03/2021 Tatyana Vladimirovna SHADRINA 1985     Rally to support I.   Azar   Moscow, 28/05/2020 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   18,000 Moscow City Court 16/10/2020 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 28/05/2020 escorting to a police station for compiling an offence report,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   20656/21 25/03/2021 Aleksandr Feliksovich VETROV 1982 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally to support A.   Navalnyy   Moscow, 02/02/2021 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO 12 days of detention Moscow City Court 09/02/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of detention was executed immediately; an appeal against conviction had no suspensive effect 5,000   20779/21 22/03/2021 Andrey Vladimirovich SUSLONOV 1988 Zubarev Dmitriy Vladimirovich Vladivostok Rally to support S.   Furgal   Vladivostok, 01/08/2020       Rally to support S.   Furgal   Vladivostok, 08/08/2020 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO             article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000             fine of RUB   10,000 Primorye Regional Court 16/11/2020           Primorye Regional Court 16/11/2020 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 22/08/2020 escorting to a police station for compiling offence reports in relation to the rallies on 01/08/2020 and 08/08/2020 4,000   21241/21 06/04/2021 Ivan Vladimirovich IGITOV 1979 Shchukin Andrey Yevgenyevich Nizhniy Tagil Rally to support A.   Navalnyy   Yekaterinburg, 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO 30 hours of community work Sverdlovsk Regional Court 18/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 31/01/2021 escorting to a police station for compiling an offence report 4,000     [1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.