CEDHCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG25
CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 14 décembre 2023
- ECLI
- ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1214DEC005135517
- Date
- 14 décembre 2023
- Publication
- 14 décembre 2023
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleStruck out of the list
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4598CDF { width:70.9pt; display:inline-block } .s8E0918A8 { width:37.55pt; display:inline-block } .sF64F4F6C { width:139.77pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 51355/17 MAHIR CITYPOSTER KFT against Hungary The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 14   December 2023 as a Committee composed of:   Krzysztof Wojtyczek , President ,   Lətif Hüseynov,   Ivana Jelić , judges , and Attila Teplán, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 12   July 2017, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The applicant, Mahir Cityposter Kft, is a limited liability company that has its seat in Budapest. It was founded in 1994. The applicant company was represented by Mr Gy. Magyar, a lawyer practising in Budapest. The applicant company’s complaints under Article 6 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 read alone and in conjunction with Article 13 of the Convention – concerning a restriction on the use of its advertising columns and the termination of the related lease agreement before the lapse of the contracted period – were communicated to the Hungarian Government (“the Government”). They submitted observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were sent to the applicant company that submitted its own observations on 26 October 2018. By a letter dated 13 September 2023, sent to the applicant company’s representative via the Court’s Electronic Communication Service (eComms), the applicant company was requested to inform the Court by 28 September 2023 of any relevant factual developments that might have occurred since the submission of its observations and to submit copies of any new documents. It was warned at the same time that the Court might strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. This letter was successfully published on the eComms system on 13   September 2023. However, the applicant company’s representative did not download it. In fact, he or his law firm have not consulted their eComms inbox since 11 September 2020. The Court has not received a reply to its letter ever since. Indeed, no communication has reached the Court from the applicant company’s side since 26 October 2018. THE LAW In the light of the foregoing, and in the absence of any special circumstances regarding respect for the rights guaranteed by the Convention and the Protocols thereto, the Court, in accordance with Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention, considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the application, because the applicant company may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue the case. Accordingly, the case should be struck out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 18 January 2024.     Attila Teplán   Krzysztof Wojtyczek   Acting Deputy Registrar   PresidentCitations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
- Formation
- 25
- Date
- 14 décembre 2023
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1214DEC005135517
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral