CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 14 décembre 2023

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4598CDF { width:70.9pt; display:inline-block } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .s8D17D8A5 { width:127.42pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 73388/17 Cosmos TĂNASE against Romania and 10 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 14   December 2023 as a Committee composed of:   Faris Vehabović , President ,   Anja Seibert-Fohr,   Anne Louise Bormann , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of the applicants is set out in the appendix. The applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Romanian Government, who submitted observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicants, who were invited to submit their own observations (see the appended table for the relevant dates). No reply was received by the Court. By letters sent by registered post, the applicants were notified that the time allowed for the submission of their observations had expired (see the appended table for the relevant dates). The applicants’ attention was further drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. No reply to these letters has been received by the Court. The registered letters either were received by the applicants or were returned to the Court (see details in the appended table). There are no previous letters from the applicants informing the Court about a change of address. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. In the light of the foregoing, the Court concludes that the applicants may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue the applications (Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention). Furthermore, in accordance with Article   37   §   1 in   fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto which require the continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 18 January 2024.     Viktoriya Maradudina   Faris Vehabović   Acting Deputy Registrar   President   APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article   3 of the Convention (inadequate conditions of detention) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Representative’s name and location Date of the applicant’s last letter to the Court Date of sending Government’s observations to the applicant Time-limit for submission of response by the applicant Date of the Court’s registered letter Date of receipt/return of the registered letter Date of release       73388/17 05/10/2017 Cosmos TĂNASE 1973 Ciprian Olimpiu Mitoşeriu Iasi 02/08/2021 21/03/2022 02/05/2022 08/09/2022 20/09/2022 Signed for receipt by the representative 05/04/2017     16893/20 22/06/2020 Cătălin BURCIU 1982     28/08/2020 28/07/2023 08/09/2023 22/09/2023 03/10/2023 Signed for receipt by the applicant 01/09/2020     18819/20 17/09/2020 Nicu FERARU 1984     16/10/2020 23/03/2023 04/05/2023 22/05/2023 30/05/2023 Illegible signature 16/03/2022     25829/20 08/08/2020 Laurențiu ZAMFIR 1969     30/03/2021 23/03/2023 04/05/2023 22/05/2023 24/07/2023 Returned to sender as “unclaimed” 23/09/2021     35567/20 21/09/2020 Cristian ADAR 1969     19/11/2020 23/03/2023 04/05/2023 22/05/2023 30/05/2023 Illegible signature 20/12/2022     36089/20 17/09/2020 Florin STELEA 1984     25/11/2020 23/03/2023 04/05/2023 22/05/2023 30/05/2023 Signed for receipt by the applicant’s sister 18/03/2020     38500/20 09/11/2020 Iulian GHEORGHE 1991     25/01/2021 23/03/2023 04/05/2023 22/05/2023 30/05/2023 Signed for receipt by a relative 05/05/2021     39641/20 13/10/2020 Viorel-Marian IBĂNESCU 1975     15/10/2021 23/03/2023 04/05/2023 22/05/2023 24/07/2023 Returned to sender as “unclaimed” 23/08/2022     46494/20 10/12/2020 Călin ZAPAN 1975     22/02/2021 28/07/2023 08/09/2023 22/09/2023 Handed over on 13/10/2023, according to information on the website of the Romanian Post     48506/20 02/12/2020 Dan MUSTAȚĂ 1977     11/12/2020 28/07/2023 08/09/2023 22/09/2023 03/10/2023 Signed for receipt by the București-Jilava Prison representative In detention in București-Jilava Prison   15559/21 28/04/2021 Petru CISMARIU 1975     10/05/2021 28/07/2023 08/09/2023 22/09/2023 02/10/2023 Illegible signature 09/09/2021