CEDHCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG29
CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 18 janvier 2024
- ECLI
- ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0118DEC000270416
- Date
- 18 janvier 2024
- Publication
- 18 janvier 2024
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleStruck out of the list
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s46DB5BA6 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sC986E16F { font-family:Arial; color:#ffffff } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .s56698C1A { width:138.1pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block }   FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 2704/16 Taras Teodoziyovych KOVTALYUK against Ukraine The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 18   January 2024 as a Committee composed of:   Mārtiņš Mits , President ,   Kateřina Šimáčková,   Mykola Gnatovskyy , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 21   December 2015, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The applicant, Mr Taras Teodoziyovych Kovtalyuk, was born in 1967. He was represented by Mr B.S. Gumenyuk, a lawyer practising in Delyatyn. In November 2021 the Court was informed that the applicant had died and that his wife, Ms Nadiia Mykolaivna Kovtalyuk wished to pursue the application in his stead. The complaints under Article 6 of the Convention and under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 about the invalidation, following a request by a prosecutor, of the applicant’s title to a land plot he had bought from the local authorities, as the land belonged to the railway protection zone, were communicated to the Ukrainian Government (“the Government”). The Government’s observations, received in September 2023, were sent to the applicant’s representative via the Court’s electronic communications service (eComms). The documents were downloaded, but no reply has been received. On 16 November 2023 the applicant party was warned, via eComms, that the time-limit for submission of the observations had expired and that the case could be struck out of the list. The new deadline for response to confirm the interest in pursuing the application was set until 1   December 2023. The letter was not downloaded. On 7 December 2023, when contacted by phone by the Registry, the applicant’s representative informed the Court that the applicant party wished to withdraw the application. THE LAW In the light of the foregoing, the Court concludes that the applicant may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue the application (Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention). Furthermore, in accordance with Article   37   §   1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto which require the continued examination of the application. Accordingly, the case should be struck out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 8 February 2024.     Viktoriya Maradudina   Mārtiņš Mits   Acting Deputy Registrar   President  Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
- Formation
- 29
- Date
- 18 janvier 2024
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0118DEC000270416
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral