CEDHCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG29
CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 18 janvier 2024
- ECLI
- ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0118DEC001440114
- Date
- 18 janvier 2024
- Publication
- 18 janvier 2024
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleStruck out of the list
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sC986E16F { font-family:Arial; color:#ffffff } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .s56698C1A { width:138.1pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block }   FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 14401/14 Sergiy Valentynovych CHUB against Ukraine The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 18   January 2024 as a Committee composed of:   Mārtiņš Mits , President ,   Kateřina Šimáčková,   Mykola Gnatovskyy , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 7   February 2014, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The applicant, Mr Sergiy Valentynovych Chub, was born in 1958. He was represented by Mr O.F. Nesterenko, a lawyer practising in Cherkasy. The applicant’s complaints under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention concerning the invalidation of his title to a plot of land he had obtained from the local authorities were communicated to the Ukrainian Government (“the Government”), who submitted observations on the admissibility and merits. The Government’s observations, received in April 2023, were sent to the applicant’s representative for comments via the Court’s electronic communications service (eComms). The files were downloaded, but no reply was provided within the set time-limit. The Registry contacted the applicant’s representative by phone; he said that the observations had been prepared but not sent for some technical reasons and confirmed that they would be sent. As no observations had reached the Court, on 24 August and 16   November 2023 the applicant was, via eComms, warned that the time-limit for submission of his observations expired and that his case could be struck out of the list. In the last letter he was given the deadline until 1   December 2023 to confirm whether he was still interested in pursuing his application. Both letters were downloaded from the eComms platform but left without reply. THE LAW In the light of the foregoing, and in the absence of any special circumstances regarding respect for the rights guaranteed by the Convention and the Protocols thereto, the Court, in accordance with Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention, considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the application. Accordingly, the case should be struck out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 8 February 2024.     Viktoriya Maradudina   Mārtiņš Mits   Acting Deputy Registrar   PresidentCitations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
- Formation
- 29
- Date
- 18 janvier 2024
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0118DEC001440114
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral