CEDH · CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG — 18 janvier 2024

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sD9DA4929 { margin-top:72pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s82B4DA5F { page-break-before:right; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .sDECD9755 { margin-left:11.67pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:6.78pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .sDA7B489D { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:15pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:3.45pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s5C5C410E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:18.34pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:0.11pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s67CAFE05 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:18.45pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s7C22C014 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:16.34pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:2.11pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .sD11CFAB7 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:15.01pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify; padding-left:1.99pt; font-family:Arial } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .sD58C010 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:15.01pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:1.99pt; font-family:Arial } .sBB6E85D0 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:34pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-17pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sE5BF05B1 { width:2.33pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4598CDF { width:70.9pt; display:inline-block } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .sF1F8E4D4 { width:130.09pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .sCC22C24E { font-family:Arial; color:#3e3e3e } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .sA4BC3E2E { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }       FIRST SECTION CASE OF SKOROKHODOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 38070/21 and 27 others – see appended list)           JUDGMENT   STRASBOURG 18 January 2024         This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.   In the case of Skorokhodov and Others v. Russia, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Péter Paczolay , President ,   Gilberto Felici,   Raffaele Sabato , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 14 December 2023, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.     The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article   34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table. 2.     The Russian Government (“the   Government”) were given notice of the applications. THE FACTS 3.     The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table. 4.     The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies. They also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention. THE LAW JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 5.     Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment. JURISDICTION 6.     The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos.   40792/10 and 2   others, §§   68 ‑ 73, 17   January 2023). ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE   11 OF THE CONVENTION 7.     The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article   11 of the Convention. 8.     The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see Kudrevičius and Others v.   Lithuania [GC], no.   37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v.   Turkey , no.   74552/01, ECHR 2006 ‑ XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v.   Moldova , no.   33482/06, 31   March 2009). 9.     In the leading cases of Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014, and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 10.     Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicants’ freedom of assembly were not “necessary in a democratic society”. 11.     These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention. OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW 12.     The applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention and its Protocols, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible. 13.     Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that these complaints also disclose violations of the Convention and its Protocols in the light of its findings in Lashmankin and Others v. Russia , nos. 57818/09 and 14 others, § 489, 7 February 2017, Butkevich v. Russia , no.   5865/07, §§   63-65, 13 February 2018, Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia , nos.   54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 115-31, 10 April 2018, and Korneyeva v.   Russia , no.   72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v. Russia , no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (the CAO); Tsvetkova and Others , cited above, §§   179-91, and Martynyuk v.   Russia , no.   13764/15, §§ 38-42, 8 October 2019, relating to the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal against the sentence of administrative detention. REMAINING COMPLAINTS 14.     Some applicants raised further additional complaints under the Convention. In view of the findings in paragraphs above, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 15.     Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case ‑ law (see in particular Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos.   25809/17 and 14 others, §   22, 4   October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table. FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY, Decides to join the applications; Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with these applications as they relate to facts that took place before 16   September 2022; Declares the complaints under Article 11 of the Convention and the other complaints under the well-established case-law of the Court, as set out in the appended table, admissible, and finds that there is no need to examine separately the remaining complaints under the Convention raised by the applicants; Holds that these complaints disclose a breach of Article   11 of the Convention; Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention and the Protocols thereto as regards the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table); Holds (a)   that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement; (b)   that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. Done in English, and notified in writing on 18 January 2024, pursuant to Rule   77   §§   2 and   3 of the Rules of Court.     Viktoriya Maradudina   Péter Paczolay   Acting Deputy Registrar   President     APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention (disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Representative’s name and location Name of the public event Location Date Administrative charges (code of administrative offences, CAO) Penalty Final domestic decision Court Name Date Other complaints under well-established case-law Amount awarded for pecuniary and non ‑ pecuniary damage (in euros) [1]     38070/21 14/07/2021 Nikita Valeryevich SKOROKHODOV 1996 Pershakova Yelena Yuryevna Moscow Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy   Moscow   31/01/2021 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO administrative detention of 10 days Moscow City Court 12/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3   hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 11.40 a.m. on 31/01/2021 to 2.00 p.m. on 01/02/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Moscow City Court, 12/03/2021,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.   5,000     38179/21 16/07/2021 Filipp Freddiyevich KADENA 1996 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy   Moscow   02/02/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Moscow City Court 26/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3   hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 11.22 p.m. on 02/02/2021 to 6.57 a.m. on 03/02/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Moscow City Court, 26/04/2021.   4,000     41042/21 23/07/2021 Timofey Nikitich SOLOVOV 2000 Tevosov Georgiy Eduardovich Moscow Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy   Moscow   03/02/2021 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO administrative detention of 7   days Moscow City Court 30/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3   hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 00.15 p.m. on 03/02/2021 to 04/02/2021, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Moscow City Court, 30/03/2021. 5,000     41079/21 28/07/2021 Daniil Antonovich SHESTAKOV 1997 Bochilo Anna Yevgenyevna Barnaul Rally in support to Mr   Navalnyy   Perm   23/01/2021   Rally (march) in support of Mr   Navalnyy   Perm   31/01/2021   Hybrid political rally (demonstration and march)   Perm   21/04/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO           article 20.2 § 5 of CAO             article 20.2 § 8 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000           fine of RUB   10,000             administrative detention of 10 days Perm Regional Court 13/04/2021       Perm Regional Court 03/09/2021         Perm Regional Court 30/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3   hours and without “exceptional circumstances”: - from 9.00 p.m. on 23/01/2021 (few hours after the end of the rally) to 00.00 a.m. on 24/01/2021, while the said record was drawn up later; the applicant’s deprivation of liberty was not recorded in any way, - from 1.40 p.m. to 6.00 p.m. on 31/01/2021, - from 3.00 p.m. on 22/04/2021 to 23/04/2021, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decisions: Perm City Court, 13/04/2021, 30/04/2021 and 03/09/2021,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant by the court of first instance was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. 5,000     43685/21 16/08/2021 Fedor Konstantinovich KOLESNICHENKO 1995 Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius Rally in support to Mr   Navalnyy   Moscow   23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   20,000 Moscow City Court 04/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3   hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 7.00 p.m. on 23/01/2021 to 25/01/2021, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case.   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Moscow City Court, 04/03/2021. 4,000     45063/21 02/09/2021 Anastasiya Aleksandrovna POPOVA 1992 Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Vilnius Rally in support of Mr   Navalnyy   Syktyvkar, Komi Republic   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Supreme Court of the Komi Republic 17/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3   hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 1.55 p.m. to 9.15 p.m. on 31/01/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Supreme Court of the Komi Republic, 17/03/2021. 4,000     45070/21 09/08/2021 Varvara Yuryevna ZHARKAYA 1983 Karavayev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Nizhniy Novgorod Rally in support of Mr   Navalnyy   Moscow   02/02/2021 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO administrative detention of 10 days Moscow City Court 10/02/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Moscow City Court, 10/02/2021. 5,000     45707/21 26/08/2021 Aleksandra Olegovna VORONINA 1991 Zubarev Dmitriy Vladimirovich Vladivostok Rally in support of Mr   Navalnyy   Vladivostok   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000 Primorye Regional Court 30/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3   hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 2.10 p.m. to 7.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Primorye Regional Court, 30/03/2021.   4,000     46123/21 10/09/2021 Sergey Valeryevich GOROKHOV 1974     Rally in support of Mr   Navalnyy   Volgograd   23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Volgograd Regional Court 24/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3   hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 3.45 p.m. to 9.30 p.m. on 23/01/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Volgograd Regional Court, 24/03/2021. 4,000   46221/21 10/09/2021 Konstantin Olegovich ZARUBA 1990 Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius Rally in support of Mr   Navalnyy   Moscow   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000 Moscow City Court 22/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3   hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 5.30 p.m. to 10.00 p.m. on 31/01/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Moscow City Court, 22/03/2021. 4,000   46427/21 03/09/2021 Vladislav Romanovich KACHEROV 2000 Vertegel Feliks Yevgenyevich Krasnodar Rally in support of Mr   Navalnyy   Krasnodar   23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 2 of CAO administrative detention of 1   day Krasnodar Regional Court 15/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 5.20 p.m. on 23/01/2021 to 24/01/2021, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Krasnodar Regional Court, 15/03/2021. 4,000   46699/21 17/09/2021 Yekaterina Mikhaylovna VANSLOVA 1990 Zadorozhnaya Mariya Aleksandrovna Nizhniy Novgorod Rally in support of Mr   Navalnyy   Nizhniy Novgorod   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court 18/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3   hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 1.40 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 1.00 p.m. on 01/02/2021, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court, 18/03/2021.   4,000   47009/21 15/09/2021 Yelena Valeriyevna YEVSEYEVA 1977 Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Vilnius Rally in support of Mr   Navalnyy   Saransk, Republic of Mordovia   31/01/2021 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Supreme Court of the Mordovia Republic 24/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3   hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 1.30 p.m. to 10.00 p.m. on 31/01/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Supreme Court of the Mordovia Republic, 24/03/2021. 4,000   47891/21 07/09/2021 Sergey Nikolayevich DYADKIN 1969 Kosheleva Inna Viktorovna Kirov Rally in support of Mr   Navalnyy   Kirov   23/01/2021   Rally in support of Mr   Navalnyy   Kirov   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO           article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000           fine of RUB   10,000 Kirov Regional Court 09/03/2021       Kirov Regional Court 25/05/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decisions: Kirov Regional Court, 09/03/2021 and 25/05/2021. 4,000   48359/21 23/09/2021 Denis Aleksandrovich TASKIN 1990 Valenkov Andrey Olegovich Nizhniy Novgorod Rally in support of Mr   Navalnyy   Nizhniy Novgorod   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court 24/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3   hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 1.20 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 3.00 p.m. on 01/02/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court, 24/03/2021. 4,000   49416/21 01/10/2021 Vladislav Kirillovich SHTUKATUROV 1997 Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Vilnius Rally in support to Mr   Navalnyy   Ryazan   23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 2 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Ryazan Regional Court 08/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3   hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 2.20 p.m. on 23/01/2021 to 10.25 a.m. on 24/01/2021, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Ryazan Regional Court, 08/04/2021. 4,000   49480/21 01/10/2021 Oleg Nikolayevich TOTSKIY 2002 Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Vilnius Rally in support to Mr   Navalnyy   Vladivostok   23/01/2021 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO   fine of RUB   10,000 Primorye Regional Court 12/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3   hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 3.00 p.m. to 10.00 p.m. on 23/01/2021, while the said record was drawn up only on 01/03/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Primorye Regional Court, 12/04/2021. 4,000   49512/21 01/10/2021 Ron Igorevich DEYCH 2000 Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius Rally in support of Mr   Navalnyy   Nizhniy Novgorod   31/01/2021 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court 07/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3   hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 12.05 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 02/02/2010, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court, 07/04/2021. 4,000   49677/21 16/09/2021 Angelina Vladimirovna BURDAKOVA 1994 Nurgaleyev Danil Ilnurovich Kazan Rally in support of Mr   Navalnyy   Kazan   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic 31/03/2021   3,500   49679/21 17/09/2021 Yelena Vasilyevna GULINA 1968 Mezak Ernest Aleksandrovich Saint-Barthélemy-d’Anjou Rally in support of Mr   Navalnyy   Syktyvkar   23/01/2021   Rally in support of Mr   Navalnyy     Syktyvkar   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO           article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000           fine of RUB   10,000 Supreme Court of the Komi Republic 12/05/2021     Supreme Court of the Komi Republic 17/03/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decisions: Supreme Court of the Komi Republic, 17/03/2021 and12/05/2021 4,000   49714/21 17/09/2021 Kirill Alekseyevich FOKIN 1999 Kosnyrev Vladislav Vladimirovich Syktyvkar Rally in support of Mr   Navalnyy   Syktyvkar   03/02/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Supreme Court of the Komi Republic 17/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3   hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 1.00 p.m. to 9.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Supreme Court of the Komi Republic, 17/03/2021.     4,000   49723/21 17/09/2021 Galina Aleksandrovna LOGINOVSKIKH 1965 Kosnyrev Vladislav Vladimirovich Syktyvkar Rally in support of Mr   Navalnyy   Syktyvkar   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Supreme Court of the Komi Republic 17/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3   hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 1.45 p.m. to 8.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Supreme Court of the Komi Republic, 17/03/2021 4,000   50084/21 24/09/2021 Ilya Andreyevich YUDIN 1993     Rally in support of Mr   Navalnyy   Samara   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 2 of CAO administrative detention of 7   days Samara Regional Court 01/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3   hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 2.00 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 9.00 a.m. on 01/02/2021, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Samara Regional Court, 01/04/2021. 5,000   50105/21 21/09/2021 Yekaterina Yuryevna SURIKOVA 2002 Aksenova Darya Dmitriyevna Kolomna Rally in support of Mr   Navalnyy   Moscow   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000 Moscow City Court 22/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3   hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 3.15 p.m. to 10.15 p.m. on 31/01/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Moscow City Court, 22/03/2021.   4,000   50477/21 29/09/2021 Yevgeniy Sergeyevich DRUSHCHENKO 1990 Vertegel Feliks Yevgenyevich Krasnodar Rally in support of Mr   Navalnyy   Krasnodar   23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Krasnodar Regional Court 31/03/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Krasnodar Regional Court, 31/03/2021.   3,500   50671/21 29/09/2021 Daniil Vladimirovich PROKOPENKO 1991 Dubrovina Marina Alekseyevna Novorossiysk Rally in support of Mr   Navalnyy   Anapa   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   18,000 Krasnodar Regional Court 29/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3   hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 1.50 p.m. to 8.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Krasnodar Regional Court, 29/03/2021. 4,000   50901/21 01/10/2021 Andrey Konstantinovich ROMANOV 1998 Aksenova Darya Dmitriyevna Kolomna Rally in support of Mr   Navalnyy   Moscow   23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO community works of 30   hours Moscow City Court 22/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence on 23/01/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Moscow City Court, 22/04/2021. 5,000   50963/21 30/09/2021 Aleksandr Yuryevich PESKOV 1996 Kuroptev Aleksey Mikhaylovich Balashikha Rally in support of Mr   Navalnyy   Cherepovets   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 2 of CAO fine of RUB   20,000 Vologda Regional Court 01/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3   hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 11.55 a.m. to 4.00 p.m. on 31/01/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Vologda Regional Court, 01/04/2021,     4,000     [1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.