CEDH · CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG — 18 janvier 2024

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s82B4DA5F { page-break-before:right; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .sDECD9755 { margin-left:11.67pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:6.78pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .sDA7B489D { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:15pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:3.45pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s5C5C410E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:18.34pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:0.11pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s67CAFE05 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:18.45pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s7C22C014 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:16.34pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:2.11pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s74818F78 { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify; font-family:Arial; list-style-position:inside } .sE7B3A78A { width:1.99pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .sD11CFAB7 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:15.01pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify; padding-left:1.99pt; font-family:Arial } .s51DFF5CF { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:34pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-17pt; text-align:justify } .sE5BF05B1 { width:2.33pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4598CDF { width:70.9pt; display:inline-block } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .sF1F8E4D4 { width:130.09pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .sCC22C24E { font-family:Arial; color:#3e3e3e } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sA4BC3E2E { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }       FIRST SECTION CASE OF BUKHTENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 63772/17 and 49 others – see appended list)           JUDGMENT   STRASBOURG 18 January 2024       This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.   In the case of Bukhtenko and Others v. Russia, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Péter Paczolay , President ,   Gilberto Felici,   Raffaele Sabato , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 14 December 2024, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.     The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article   34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table. 2.     The Russian Government (“the   Government”) were given notice of the applications. THE FACTS 3.     The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table. 4.     The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention or Protocols to it. THE LAW JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 5.     Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment. Jurisdiction 6.     The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§   68 ‑ 73, 17 January 2023). ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE   11 OF THE CONVENTION 7.     The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies, namely the dispersal of these assemblies, as well as their arrest followed by their conviction for administrative offence. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 11 of the Convention. 8.     The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see Kudrevičius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no.   37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v. Turkey , no. 74552/01, ECHR 2006 ‑ XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v. Moldova , no. 33482/06, 31 March 2009). 9.     In the leading cases of Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014, and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 10.     Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicants’ freedom of assembly were not “necessary in a democratic society”. 11 .     These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention. OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW 12.     Some applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article   35   §   3   (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible. 13 .     Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its findings in Butkevich v. Russia , no. 5865/07, §§ 63-67, 13 February 2018, Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia , nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 115-31, 10 April 2018, and Korneyeva v. Russia , no. 72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v. Russia , no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences; Martynyuk v. Russia , no.   13764/15, §§   38-42, 8 October 2019, relating to the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal against the sentence of administrative detention. Remaining complaints 14.     Some applicants raised further additional complaints under the Convention or Protocols to it. In view of the findings in paragraphs 11 and 13 above, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 15.     Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see in particular Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos.   25809/17 and 14 others, § 22, 4 October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table. FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY, Decides to join the applications; Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with these applications as they relate to facts that took place before 16   September 2022; Declares the complaints under Article 11 of the Convention and the other complaints under the well-established case-law of the Court, as set out in the appended table, admissible, and finds that there is no need to examine separately the remaining complaints; Holds that these applications disclose a breach of Article   11 of the Convention; Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention and the Protocols thereto as regards the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table); Holds (a)   that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement; (b)   that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. Done in English, and notified in writing on 18 January 2024, pursuant to Rule   77   §§   2 and   3 of the Rules of Court.     Viktoriya Maradudina   Péter Paczolay   Acting Deputy Registrar   President     APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention (disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth   Representative’s name and location Name of the public event Location Date Administrative / criminal offence Penalty Final domestic decision Court Name Date Other complaints under well-established case-law Amount awarded for pecuniary and non ‑ pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros) [1]     63772/17 18/08/2017 Mikhail Vladimirovich BUKHTENKO 1995 Popkov Aleksandr Vasilyevich Sochi Anticorruption rally   Krasnodar, 26/03/2017 article 19.3 § 1 of CAO 10 days of detention Krasnodar Regional Court 06/04/2017 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - immediate execution of the sentence of detention; an appeal against conviction had no suspensive effect. 5,000     63782/17 18/08/2017 Biyslan Murdinovich ZHANE 1994 Popkov Aleksandr Vasilyevich Sochi Anticorruption rally   Krasnodar, 26/03/2017 article 19.3 § 1 of CAO 10 days of detention Krasnodar Regional Court 06/04/2017 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - immediate execution of the sentence of detention; an appeal against conviction had no suspensive effect. 5,000     68068/17 11/09/2017 Natalya Vladimirovna GRYAZNEVICH 1989 Golubok Sergey Aleksandrovich Vilnius Political event   St Petersburg, 29/04/2017 article 19.3 § 1 of CAO   article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 800   fine of RUB 10,000 St Petersburg City Court 30/05/2017   St Petersburg City Court 20/06/2017 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 29-30/04/2017 escorting to and detention in a police station for and after compiling an offence report. 4,000     70548/17 21/09/2017 Dmitriy Nikolayevich DOROGOV 1981     Anticorruption rally   Moscow, 26/03/2017 article 19.3 § 1 of CAO 10 days of detention Moscow City Court 18/04/2017 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 5,000     6456/18 10/01/2018 Yelena Aleksandrovna CHEBOTAREVA 1988 Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius Anticorruption rally   St Petersburg, 12/06/2017 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO   article 19.3 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 and 1 day of detention St Petersburg City Court 11/07/2017 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000     8422/18 12/01/2018 Aleksandr Vladimirovich STRELTSOV 1970 Peredruk Aleksandr Dmitriyevich St Petersburg Anticorruption rally   St Petersburg, 12/06/2017 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO     fine of RUB 10,000     St Petersburg City Court 13/07/2017 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 12-13/06/2017 escorting to and detention in a police station for and after compiling offence reports,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000     21532/18 20/04/2018 Mikhail Borisovich KASIMOV 1961     Opposition rally   Perm, 07/10/2017 Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO 60 hours of community work Perm Regional Court 24/11/2017   3,500     51147/18 10/10/2018 Natalya Romanovna SINYAKOVA 1997 Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius Opposition rally   St Petersburg, 28/01/2018 article 20.2 § 8 of CAO     article 19.3 § 1 of CAO 5 days of detention     4 days of detention St Petersburg City Court 22/05/2018   St Petersburg City Court 22/05/2018 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of administrative-offence proceedings.   5,000     54372/18 26/10/2018 Yegor Andreyevich KOMAROV 1999 Peredruk Aleksandr Dmitriyevich St Petersburg Opposition rally   St Petersburg, 05/05/2018 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO     article 19.3 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000   5 days of detention St Petersburg City Court 29/05/2018   St Petersburg City Court 29/05/2018 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 05/05/2018 escorting to a police station for compiling offence reports,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of administrative-offence proceedings. 5,000   54913/18 31/10/2018 Igor Gennadyevich STARUN 1998 Cherkasov Vitaliy Viktorovich St Petersburg Opposition rally   St Petersburg, 05/05/2018 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO     article 19.3 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000   5 days of detention St Petersburg City Court 29/05/2018   St Petersburg City Court 29/05/2018 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 05/05/2018 escorting to a police station for compiling offence reports,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of administrative-offence proceedings,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - immediate execution of the sentence of detention; an appeal against conviction had no suspensive effect. 5,000   57676/18 22/11/2018 Yana Olegovna GERASIMOVA 1993 Vasin Vladimir Valeryevich Krasnoyarsk Opposition rally   Krasnoyarsk, 05/05/2018 article 20.2 § 2 of CAO 3 days of detention Krasnoyarsk Regional Court 07/06/2018 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - immediate execution of the sentence of detention; an appeal against conviction had no suspensive effect. 5,000   58112/18 17/11/2018 Nikita Valeryevich SHEVCHENKO 1999 Benyash Mikhail Mikhaylovich Sochi Opposition rally   Krasnodar, 05/05/2018 article 20.2 § 8 of CAO     5 days of detention       Krasnodar Regional Court 18/05/2018   3,500   58765/18 04/12/2018 Yaroslav Romanovich MUDRYAKOV 1992 Glukhov Aleksey Vladimirovich Novocheboksarsk Opposition rally   Cheboksary, 05/05/2018 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO   fine of RUB 10,000   Supreme Court of the Chuvashia Republic 31/05/2018 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 3,500   59648/18 06/12/2018 Ruslan Sarkarovich LITOSH 1996 Glukhov Aleksey Vladimirovich Novocheboksarsk Opposition rally   Cheboksary, 05/05/2018 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO         article 20.2 § 5 of CAO 20 hours of community work       20 hours of community work Supreme Court of the Chuvashia Republic 08/06/2018   Supreme Court of the Chuvashia Republic 07/06/2018 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of administrative-offence proceedings. 3,500   39557/21 29/07/2021 Kirill Sergeyevich LYAPUNOV 1996 Eysmont Mariya Olegovna Moscow Rally to support A. Navalnyy   Moscow, 31/01/2021 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO 10 days of detention Moscow City Court 04/02/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 31/01/2021-01/02/2021 detention in a police station after compiling an offence report,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 5,000   40050/21 27/07/2021 Aleksey Aleksandrovich FILATOV 1981 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally to support A. Navalnyy   Moscow, 31/01/2021 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO 10 days of detention Moscow City Court 04/02/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 31/01/2021-02/02/2021 detention in a police station after compiling an offence report,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - immediate execution of the sentence of detention; an appeal against conviction had no suspensive effect. 5,000   40059/21 27/07/2021 Aleksandr Gennadiyevich ZELENSKIY 1986 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally to support A. Navalnyy   Moscow, 31/01/2021 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO 15 days of detention Moscow City Court 03/02/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 31/01/2021-01/02/2021 detention in a police station after compiling an offence report,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - immediate execution of the sentence of detention; an appeal against conviction had no suspensive effect. 5,000   40163/21 27/07/2021 Andrey Mikhaylovich PRUDSKOY 1995 Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Vilnius Rally to support A. Navalnyy   Moscow, 02/02/2021 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO 7 days of detention Moscow City Court 08/02/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 5,000   40318/21 27/07/2021 Aleksey Valeryevich KOMAROV 1993 Shindyapin Arkadiy Vitalyevich Moscow Rally to support A. Navalnyy   Moscow, 31/01/2021 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO 13 days of detention Moscow City Court 12/02/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 31/01/2021-01/02/2021 detention in a police station after compiling an offence report,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - immediate execution of the sentence of detention; an appeal against conviction had no suspensive effect. 5,000   40446/21 19/07/2021 Aleksandr Vladimirovich NAUMOV 1999 Zatonskaya Yuliya Vladimirovna Lipetsk Rally to support A. Navalnyy   Lipetsk, 23/01/2021   Rally to support A. Navalnyy   Lipetsk, 21/04/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO         article 20.2 § 8 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000       fine of RUB 75,000 Lipetsk Regional Court 11/03/2021       Lipetsk Regional Court 10/06/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - (i) on 23/01/2021 escorting to a police station for compiling an offence report and (ii) on 21-22/04/2021 escorting to and detention in a police station for and after compiling an offence report,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of administrative-offence proceedings. 4,850   40500/21 28/07/2021 Yuliya Yuryevna MOROZOVA 1966 Bochilo Anna Yevgenyevna Barnaul Rally to support A. Navalnyy   Rostov-on-Don, 23/01/2021     Rally to support A. Navalnyy   Rostov-on-Don, 31/01/2021 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO           article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO 7 days of detention           10 days of detention Rostov Regional Court 15/02/2021         Rostov Regional Court 08/02/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 31/01/2021 escorting to and detention in a police station for compiling an offence report and on 10/02/2021 (in relation to the rally on 23/01/2021),   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of administrative-offence proceedings,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - immediate execution of the sentences of detention; an appeal against conviction had no suspensive effect. 5,000   40662/21 25/07/2021 Mariya Valeryevna TUROVETS 1986 Mikhaylova Varvara Dmitriyevna St Petersburg Rally to support A. Navalnyy   Volgograd, 23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Volgograd Regional Court 24/02/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 23/01/2021 escorting to a police station for compiling an offence report,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   40819/21 21/07/2021 Vladimir Borisovich ZVONOVSKIY 1966 Krasikov Vladimir Vladimirovich Samara Rally to support A. Navalnyy   Samara, 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 15,000 Samara Regional Court 15/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 31/01/2021 escorting to a police station for compiling an offence report,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   41106/21 29/07/2021 Konstantin Aleksandrovich BEREZA 1985 Chashchilova Mariya Valeryevna Moscow Rally to support A. Navalnyy   Moscow, 23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 15,000 Moscow City Court 11/05/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 23-24/01/2021 escorting to and detention in a police station for compiling an offence report,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   41200/21 01/08/2021 Konstantin Valeryevich LIKHACHEV 1993 Eysmont Mariya Olegovna Moscow Rally to support A. Navalnyy   Moscow, 31/01/2021 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO 7 days of detention Moscow City Court 05/02/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 31/01/2021-01/02/2021 detention after compiling an offence report,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 5,000   41464/21 31/07/2021 Aleksey Mikhaylovich VOSKOBOYNIKOV 1990 Eysmont Mariya Olegovna Moscow Rally to support A. Navalnyy   Moscow, 31/01/2021 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO 5 days of detention Moscow City Court 05/02/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 31/01/2021-01/02/2021 detention in a police station after compiling an offence report,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.     5,000   41646/21 07/08/2021 Dinislam Aleksandrovich SALIKHOV 1989 Agagyulyan Ani Mesropovna Moscow Rally to support A. Navalnyy   Moscow, 02/02/2021 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO 10 days of detention Moscow City Court 09/02/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 02-04/02/2021 detention in a police station after compiling an offence report,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - immediate execution of the sentence of detention; an appeal against conviction had no suspensive effect. 5,000   41675/21 06/08/2021 Yevgeniy Aleksandrovich KOSTYUK 1976 Pershakova Yelena Yuryevna Moscow Rally to support A. Navalnyy   Moscow, 31/01/2021 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO 15 days of detention Moscow City Court 12/02/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - immediate execution of the sentence of detention; an appeal against conviction had no suspensive effect. 5,000   42474/21 05/08/2021 Yevgeniy Andreyevich SYSOYEV 1995 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally to support A. Navalnyy   Moscow, 31/01/2021 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO 8 days of detention Moscow City Court 05/02/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 31/01/2021-01/02/2021 detention in a police station after compiling an offence report,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - immediate execution of the sentence of detention; an appeal against conviction had no suspensive effect.   5,000   43000/21 23/08/2021 Darya Sergeyevna SABAYEVA 1992 Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius Rally to support A. Navalnyy   Yaroslavl, 23/01/2021   Rally to support A. Navalnyy   Yaroslavl, 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO         article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000       fine of RUB 10,000 Yaroslavl Regional Court 22/04/2021       Yaroslavl Regional Court 30/03/2021   3,500   43142/21 12/08/2021 Anatoliy Viktorovich KUTSENKOV 1982 Zakhvatov Dmitriy Igorevich Moscow Rally to support A. Navalnyy   Moscow, 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 8 of CAO 20 days of detention Moscow City Court 12/02/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 31/01/2021- 01/02/2021 detention after compiling an offence report,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 5,000   43184/21 11/08/2021 Albina Ravisovna KUZNETSOVA 1998 Nurgaleyev Danil Ilnurovich Kazan Rally to support A. Navalnyy   Kazan, 23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic 07/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 30-31/01/2021 escorting to and detention in a police station for and after compiling an offence report in relation to the rally on 23/01/2021. 4,000   43216/21 18/08/2021 Ivan Sergeyevich YAKOVLEV 2002 Pershakova Yelena Yuryevna Moscow Rally to commemorate the anniversary of the revolution   Perm, 07/11/2020 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Perm Regional Court 02/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 07/11/2020 escorting to a police station for compiling an offence report,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative ‑ offence proceedings. 4,000   43276/21 09/08/2021 David Petrovich SHUSTOV 1996 Zyryanova Mariya Sergeyevna St Petersburg Rally to support A. Navalnyy   St Petersburg, 23/01/2021 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO 2 days of detention St Petersburg City Court 18/02/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 23-24/01/2021 escorting to and detention in a police station for and after compiling an offence report,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - immediate execution of the sentence of detention; an appeal against conviction had no suspensive effect. 5,000   43497/21 12/08/2021 Irina Alekseyevna RAY 1968 MOO MEMORIAL Human Rights Centre St Petersburg Rally to support A. Navalnyy   Moscow, 02/02/2021 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO 8 days of detention Moscow City Court 22/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 02-03/02/2021 detention in a police station after compiling an offence report,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 5,000   44199/21 26/08/2021 Zhanna Vladimirovna LEVKINA 1968 Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Vilnius Rally to support A. Navalnyy   Kurgan, 23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 15,000 Kurgan Regional Court 17/03/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative ‑ offence proceedings. 3,500   44391/21 26/08/2021 Kseniya Aleksandrovna VOLKOVA 1991 Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Vilnius Rally to support A. Navalnyy   Kazan, 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic 17/03/2021   3,500   44588/21 09/08/2021 Yuliya Dmitriyevna ILYUSHKINA 1999 Karavayev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Nizhniy Novgorod Rally to support A. Navalnyy   Moscow, 02/02/2021 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO 10 days of detention Moscow City Court 10/02/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative ‑ offence proceedings. 5,000   45060/21 02/09/2021 Anastasiya Aleksandrovna TALYKOVA 2021 Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Vilnius Rally to support A. Navalnyy   Kurgan, 23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 15,000 Kurgan Regional Court 17/03/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative ‑ offence proceedings. 3,500   46957/21 20/09/2021 Sergey Yuryevich SHUNIN 1974 Valiyeva Elza Albertovna Nizhniy Novgorod Rally to support A. Navalnyy   Nizhniy Novgorod, 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court 11/08/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 31/01/2021 escorting to a police station for compiling an offence report. 4,000   48927/21 24/09/2021 Vasiliy Veniaminovich GRAUR 1982     Rally to support A. Navalnyy   Vladimir, 23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 15,000 Vladimir Regional Court 30/03/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative ‑ offence proceedings. 3,500   49283/21 22/09/2021 Nikita Stanislavovich PAVLOVETS 2001 Ivanova Tatyana Andreyevna Irkutsk Rally to support A. Navalnyy   Irkutsk, 31/01/2021   article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Irkutsk Regional Court 17/06/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative ‑ offence proceedings. 3,500   49471/21 01/10/2021 Aleksandr Gennadyevich SHEYKIN 1982 Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius Rally to support A. Navalnyy   Stavropol, 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Stavropol Regional Court 07/04/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative ‑ offence proceedings. 3,500   50215/21 23/09/2021 Sergey Yuryevich BARANOV 1982 Shchukin Andrey Yevgenyevcich Nizhniy Tagil Rally to support A. Navalnyy   Yekaterinburg, 21/04/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO 30 hours of community work Sverdlovsk Regional Court 28/05/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative ‑ offence proceedings. 3,500   50602/21 29/09/2021 Viktoriya Pavlovna KAMENSKAYA 1987 Dubrovina Marina Alekseyevna Novorossiysk Rally to support A. Navalnyy   Novorossiysk, 31/01/2021 article 20.2.2 §   1 of CAO fine of RUB 12,000 Krasnodar Regional Court 29/03/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative ‑ offence proceedings. 3,500   51772/21 15/10/2021 Andrey Viktorovich ZADERENKO 1994 Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius Rally to support A. Navalnyy   Moscow, 23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 20,000 Moscow City Court 20/04/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative ‑ offence proceedings. 3,500   51933/21 15/10/2021 Aleksey Yuryevich DERYUSHEV 1992 Pershakova Yelena Yuryevna Moscow Rally to support A. Navalnyy   Perm, 23/01/2021   Rally to support A. Navalnyy   Perm, 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO         article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000       fine of RUB 15,000 Perm Regional Court 16/04/2021       Perm Regional Court 14/05/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 24/01/2021 and 31/01/2021 escorting to a police station for compiling an offence report,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   51939/21 15/10/2021 Artem Viktorovich RODIONOV 1992 Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius Rally to support A. Navalnyy   Saransk, 23/01/2021 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO fine of RUB 5,000 Supreme Court of Mordovia Republic 28/04/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative ‑ offence proceedings. 3,500   52463/21 24/09/2021 Andrey Ashotovich SARKISYAN 1989 Mezak Ernest Aleksandrovich Saint-Barthélemy-d’Anjou Rally to support A. Navalnyy   Petropavlovsk-Kamchatskiy, 23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 2 of CAO fine of RUB 20,000 Kamchatka Regional Court 24/03/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative ‑ offence proceedings. 3,500   52559/21 01/10/2021 Oleg Sergeyevich SHATIN 1997 Nurgaleyev Danil Ilnurovich Kazan Rally to support A. Navalnyy   Kazan, 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic 28/04/2021   3,500   [1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.