CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 30 janvier 2024

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5FFF0A77 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:1pt } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s9D48DD53 { margin-top:6pt; margin-left:21.25pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:7.1pt; text-align:justify; font-size:10pt } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sC986E16F { font-family:Arial; color:#ffffff } .sB6A7F5BF { width:17.54pt; display:inline-block } .s7D49190C { width:104.74pt; display:inline-block } .s5D826FD4 { width:25.88pt; display:inline-block } .s1B61D60 { width:156.43pt; display:inline-block } .sD00444C6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt } .s75A32C27 { border-collapse:collapse } .s2F3EB0E4 { border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sE1A7A04C { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#424242 } .sFA1E7299 { height:279.3pt } .sBAADFE8C { border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s329BAEFC { height:179.5pt } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s66E9FC38 { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 } .sA1D3DA2E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s85226119 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; font-size:10pt } .s653E6C45 { font-family:Arial; font-size:6.67pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 }     SECOND SECTION DECISION Application no. 7307/20 KARPOSH FACTORY AD against North Macedonia and 6 other applications (see list appended)   The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 30   January 2024 as a Committee composed of:   Lorraine Schembri Orland , President ,   Jovan Ilievski,   Diana Sârcu , judges , and Dorothee von Arnim, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE 1.     A list of the applicants is set out in the appendix. 2.     The Government of North Macedonia (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms D. Djonova. 3.     The applicants complained under Articles 6 and 13 and Article   1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention about the lengthy non-enforcement of final judgments and decisions ordering a State-owned enterprise for national roads and motorways and a State-run student dorm to pay the applicants different amounts of money. 4.     On 15 May 2023 the Court received from the Government friendly settlement declarations signed by the parties under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against the respondent State in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications. Furthermore, they agreed to the following: ... “2. The applicants undertake to submit to the Government within one month following the notification of the Court’s decision striking the case out of its list of cases, a fresh notification issued by the competent bailiff with respect to each and every payments made by the debtor upon the enforcement order, issued upon the final decision delivered in the case mentioned in paragraph 1 above, in particular with respect to any such payments by the debtor after the notification issued by the competent bailiff and submitted by the applicants in the process of friendly settlement negotiations. 3. The applicants undertake to submit to the Government within one month following the notification of the Court’s decision striking the respective part of the case out of its list of the cases, notification that the enforcement request submitted with respect to the final decision that is subject matter of the application, delivered in the case mentioned in paragraph 1, has been withdrawn and that therefore the appropriate enforcement proceedings has been terminated.” ... 5.     On their part, the Government undertook to pay the applicants the amounts detailed in the appended table, covering any pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage, as well as legal costs and expenses, less the sums already paid by the debtor at national level after the notification issued by the competent bailiff and submitted by the applicants in the process of friendly settlement negotiations. As specified in the declarations, these amounts are set out in the national currency of the respondent State, and will be payable within four months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases. THE LAW 6.     Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. 7.     The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention. Done in English and notified in writing on 22 February 2024.     Dorothee von Arnim   Lorraine Schembri Orland   Deputy Registrar   President   Appendix List of cases: No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s Year of Birth/Registration Place of Residence Represented by Date of receipt of the parties’ declaration/s Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage, as well as costs and expenses to the applicants (in Macedonian denars – national currency)   1. 7307/20 28/01/2020 KARPOSH FACTORY AD 2006 Skopje   Dejan BOGDANOV 15/05/2023 642,843 2. 15860/20 12/02/2020 Elena NIKCHEVSKA 1982 Skopje Jasmina VASILKOVSKA 1979 Skopjе Dejan BOGDANOV 15/05/2023 4,224,669 [1] 3. 38176/20 19/08/2020 AGROVOJVODINA-MEHANIZACIJA NS DOOEL 1998 Skopje Dejan BOGDANOV 15/05/2023 2,888,792 4. 38659/20 22/08/2020 BOMARSKI DOOEL EXPORT-IMPORT SKOPJE 2017 Skopje Zharko HADJI-ZAFIROV 15/05/2023 2,035,816 5. 38665/20 27/08/2020 S.KOM DOOEL 2003 Skopje Zharko HADJI-ZAFIROV 15/05/2023 543,372 6. 44331/20 23/09/2020 DIDAKS DOOEL SKOPJE 1994 Skopje Dejan BOGDANOV 15/05/2023 8,375,195 7. 49268/20 22/10/2020 KARGOMAKS DOOEL MILADINOVCI ILINDEN 2007 Ilinden Dejan BOGDANOV 15/05/2023 110,205,789     [1]   The amount in question is to be paid jointly to the applicants.