CEDHCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG28
CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 1 février 2024
- ECLI
- ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0201DEC004022616
- Date
- 1 février 2024
- Publication
- 1 février 2024
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleStruck out of the list
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sC986E16F { font-family:Arial; color:#ffffff } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .sB3159364 { width:123.42pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s7BF29C1E { width:139.76pt; display:inline-block } FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 40226/16 Gheorghe BÎLEA against Romania The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 1   February 2024 as a Committee composed of:   Anja Seibert-Fohr , President ,   Anne Louise Bormann,   Sebastian Răduleţu , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 16   August 2016, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The applicant, Mr Gheorghe Bîlea, was born in 1964. On 23 September 2021 the Court (Fourth Section), sitting as a Committee, delivered a decision in a group of cases, which included the present application (see Bîlea and Others v. Romania (dec.) [Committee], nos.   40226/16 and 3 other applications), and decided to strike the application out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (c) of the Convention on the basis of a unilateral declaration submitted by the Romanian Government (“the Government”), acknowledging a violation of Article 3 of the Convention due to the applicant’s inadequate conditions of detention and awarding him 2,700 euros (EUR) in respect of pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses. On 5 January 2022 the Government made a request to restore the application to the Court’s list of cases, as during the enforcement of the Court’s decision they had learned that the applicant had died on 13 January 2020 and no heir had manifested an intention to pursue the proceedings before the Court in the applicant’s place. On 3 February 2022 the Court decided, under Rule 43 § 5 of the Rules of the Court, to disjoin the present application from those to which it had been joined (see above) and to restore it to its list of cases, considering the fact of the applicant’s death. By a letter dated 10 February 2022 sent to the applicant’s last known address, the applicant’s potential heirs were notified that the application had been restored to the Court’s list of cases. They were invited to inform the Court whether they wished to pursue the application before the Court. Their attention was drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that they do not intend to pursue the application. On 1 June 2022, a second letter was sent by registered post, requesting for information to be submitted by 29 June 2022. This letter was returned to the Court on 3 August 2022, with the note that no heirs had been identified for its delivery. THE LAW In the light of the foregoing, the Court concludes that the applicant’s potential heirs do not wish to pursue the application within the meaning of Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention. Accordingly, the case should be struck out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 22 February 2024.     Viktoriya Maradudina   Anja Seibert-Fohr   Acting Deputy Registrar   Presiden tCitations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
- Formation
- 28
- Date
- 1 février 2024
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0201DEC004022616
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral